Phased Multi-Target Areal Development Competitions: Algorithms for Competitor Allocation

• Authors: Pertti Lahdenperä

Title variants

LT

Etapiniai daugiatiksliai teritorijų plėtros konkursai: algoritmai konkursų dalyviams skirstyti

Abstracts

EN

The prevailing practice in new areal real estate development is for public and private actors to perform their duties by turns. Yet, the planning process could benefit from simultaneous contributions from society and developers and their designers. That, again, requires that the municipality selects the private partner consortia prior to completion of the local detailed plan through a competition in order to find the most potential actors and the best ideas for implementation of an urban structure of high quality. Candidates will be attracted by offering them the right to implement a residential/business block as a developer. The several blocks involved in an areal development project, and the laboriousness of producing competitive solutions, require a well planned selection process. A novel multi-target competition process was developed which is presented in this paper with special emphasis on the allocation algorithms that allow selecting the most qualified competitors for parallel follow-up competitions from among a large group of registered candidates. The approach was tested in an actual real estate development project in the municipal district of Vuores which was the original reason for launching the study.

LT

Plėtojant nekilnojamąjį turtą naujose teritorijose, vieši ir privatūs asmenys dažniausiai savo pareigas vykdo paeiliui. Tačiau planavimo procesui būtų tik geriau, jei tuo pačiu metu prisidėtų ir visuomenė, ir vystytojai, ir projektuotojai. Tam vėlgi reikia, kad savivaldybė paskelbtų konkursą ir pasirinktų privačių partnerių grupes prieš užbaigdama vietinį detalųjį planą didžiausią potencialą turintiems dalyviams aptikti ir geriausioms idėjoms surinkti, kokybiškai miesto struktūrai išvystyti. Kai teritorijų plėtros projektas apima kelis kvartalus, o kuriant konkurencingus sprendimus įdedama daug darbo, reikia gerai suplanuoto atrankos proceso. Yra sukurtas novatoriškas daugiatikslis konkurso procesas, pristatomas šiame darbe, daugiau dėmesio skiriama paskirstymo algoritmams, kuriuos naudojant iš daugybės registruotų kandidatų galima atrinkti tinkamiausius tolesniems tuo pat metu vykdomiems konkursams. Toks būdas patikrintas realiame nekilnojamojo turto plėtros projekte, kuris vyko Vuores savivaldybės teritorijoje, ir būtent dėl šios priežasties pradėtas šis tyrimas.

Keywords

EN

Urban planning; Real estate development; Competitive selection; Multi-target competition; Public-private partnership

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: International Journal of Strategic Property Management
• Year: 2009
• Volume: 13
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 1-22

Contributors

author

Pertti Lahdenperä

• VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, P.O. Box 1300, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland

References

• Alexander, E. and Witzling, L. (1990) Planning and urban design competitions: introduction and overview,Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 7(2), pp. 91-104.
• ATL et al. (2006)Rakennusalan suunnittelukilpailun periaatteet[Principles for design competitions in real estate and construction]. ATL, ASRA, RIA, RT, SAFA, SKY, MARK, RIL, Rakli, SKOL & Ornamo, Helsinki. (In Finnish)
• Bresnen, M. and Marshall, N. (2000) Motivation, commitment and the use of incentives in partnership and alliances,Construction Management and Economics, 18(5), pp. 587-598.
• City of Tampere (2005a)Vuoreksen Mäyränmäen korttelikilpailu. Kilpailuohjelma[Competition for Mäyränmäki blocks of Vuores. Competition programme]. (In Finnish)
• City of Tampere (2005b)Vuoreksen Mäyränmäen korttelikilpailu. Palkintolautakunnan arvostelupöytäkirja[Competition for Mäyränmäki blocks of Vuores. Assessment report of the jury]. (In Finnish)
• City of Tampere (2007)Vuores - Uutta ihmisläheistä ja ihmisen kokoista asumista nykyajan kaupunkilaiselle[Vuores - New pleasant living environment of human scale for today's urban dwellers]. [Online] Available at:http://www.tampere.fi/vuores
• Clemen, R. (1996)Making hard decisions. An introduction to decision analysis.2nded. Pacific Grove, Duxbury Press.
• Eerolainen, J. (2005) Maankäyttösopimukset - aitoa kumppanuutta? [Land use agreements - pure partnership?]Maankäyttö, (4), pp. 12-14. (In Finnish)
• Eley, J. (1990) Urban design competitions: a British perspective,Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 7(2), pp. 132-141.
• Fisher, P., Robson, S. and Todd, S. (2007) The disposal of public sector sites by "development competition",Property Management, 25(4), pp. 381-399.
• Gramercy Books (1994) Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language, New Jersey.
• Halepota, H. (2005) Motivational theories and their application in construction,Cost Engineering, 47(3), pp. 14-18.
• Huovila, P. (2005)Vuores - elävä ja omaleimainen pikkukaupunki. Ratkaisuehdotuksen arviointikriteerit[Vuores - a lively and unique town. Evaluation criteria of proposed solution]. Unpublished memorandum 23.11.2005. (In Finnish)
• Kasanen, E., Lukka, K. and Siitonen, A. (1991).Konstruktiivinen tutkimusote liiketaloustieteessä[Constructive approach in business studies].The Finnish Journal of Business Economics, 40(3), pp. 301-329. (In Finnish, summary in English)
• Kasanen, E., Lukka, K. and Siitonen, A. (1993) The constructive approach in management accounting research,Journal of Management Accounting Research, 5, pp. 241-264.
• Kauppinen, H. (2001)Tontinluovutuskilpailut Helsingissä[Design competitions for plots in Helsinki]. In: Rakennusprojektit [Construction projects] 2001, Hyvinkää 17.-18.5.2001. Helsinki: The Real Estate Education and Training Institute. (In Finnish)
• Kreukels, A. and Spit, T. (1990) Public-private partnership in the Netherlands,Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 81(5), pp. 388-392.
• Kurunmäki, K. (2005)Partnership in Urban Planning. "Development Area" in National and Local Contexts in Finland, Germany and Britain.Tampere University of Technology, Tampere.
• Lahdenperä, P. (2001)Design-Build Procedures. Introduction, illustration and comparison of U.S. modes.VTT Publications 452, Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT), Espoo.
• Lahdenperä, P. (2007)Aluerakennuskohteiden kehityskumppaneiden systemaattinen valinta[Systematic selection of partners for areal development projects]. VTT Research Notes 2380, Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT), Espoo. (In Finnish)
• Lahdenperä, P. (2008) Synchronizing urban and building design: experiences from competitive planning in partnership.Paper presented at the CIB W55/W65 Transformation through Construction Conference, 15-17 November 2008, Dubai, Heriot-Watt University.
• Lahdenperä, P. and Sulankivi, K. (2001)Monikriteerinen toteuttajan valinta rakennushankkeessa. Kansainvälinen kartoitus ja menetelmäperusta[Multi-criteria selection of a building project's implementers. International situation and methodological base]. VTT Publications 855, Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT), Espoo. (In Finnish)
• Lahdenperä, P. Nykänen, V. and Rintala, K. (2005)Elinkaarimallit. Tilapalveluhankkeiden vaihtoehtoiset toimintatavat[Design-Build-Operate. Alternative modes of operation for accommodation services]. VTT Research Notes 2315, Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT), Espoo. (In Finnish)
• Laki (2006) Laki tilaajan selvitysvelvollisuudesta ja vastuusta ulkopuolista työvoimaa käytettäessä 1233/2006 [Act on the Contractor's Obligations and Liability when Work is Contracted Out, 1233/2006] (2006) Edita, Helsinki. (In Finnish, unofficial translation in English)
• Maankäyttö (1999) Maankäyttö- ja rakennuslaki 132/1999 [Land Use and Building Act 132/1999] (1999). Edita, Helsinki. (In Finnish, unofficial translation in English)
• Mäkinen, V. (1980)Yrityksen toiminnan tutkimisen lähestymistavoista. Toiminta-analyyttisen tutkimusstrategian kehittelyä[Approach to research in business management. Sketching a culture-paradigmatic strategy]. University of Tampere. Series A1: Research 17. (In Finnish)
• Nykänen, V., Huovila, P., Lahdenperä, P., Lahti, P., Riihimäki, M. and Karlund, J. (2007)Kumppanuuskaavoitus aluerakentamisessa. Beyond Vuores - tutkimus[Collaborative urban planning. Case Beyond Vuores]. VTT Research Notes 2393, Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT), Espoo. (In Finnish)
• Rakentamisen (2007) Rakentamisen Laatu RALA [Construction Quality Association RALA] [Online] Available at:http://www.rala.fi/
• RIL (2000)Kilpailusäännöt rakennusinsinööritaitokilpailussa[Competition rules in a civil engineering competition]. Association of Finnish Civil Engineers RIL, Helsinki. (In Finnish)
• Rowley, A. (1998) Private-property decision makers and the quality of urban design,Journal of Urban Design, 3(2), pp. 151-173.
• Saaty, T. (2001)Decision making for leaders. The analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world.3rd ed. Vol. II, AHP Series, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
• SAFA (1994)Kilpailusäännöt Suomessa järjestettäviä kansallisia arkkitehtuurikilpailuja varten[Competition rules for national architectural competitions arranged in Finland]. The Finnish Association of Architects SAFA, Helsinki. (In Finnish)
• Stenberg, A.-C. and Kadefors, A. (2000) Procurement practices and innovation processes: A case study of a developer competition for green building. In: Serpell, A. (ed.)Information and Communication in Construction Procurement.CIB W92 Procurement System Symposium, Santiago, Chile, April 24-27. Santiago, CL: Department of Construction Engineering and Management, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. CIB Proceedings, Publication 249, pp. 767-782.
• Taylor, N. (1998)Urban Planning Theory Since 1945.Sage, London.
• Väyrynen, E. (2007) Planning and implementation - from separation to joint processes.Nordic Planning Research Symposium on Local Authority Planning in Change: Beyond Dichotomies, August 16-18, 2007, Oulu. University of Oulu, Department of Architecture.

Identifiers

DOI

10.3846/1648-715X.2009.13.1-22