Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2009 | 19 | 1 | 1-35

Article title

Where to look for the fundamentals of language

Authors

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
Rigor in syntax is widely taken to require constituency-based formalisms. However, classical European structural linguistics provides other ways of meeting the methodological requirements. The advantages of these ways are becoming increasingly evident. In section 1 of this paper, we discuss how this would allow the distinction between the core of language, patterned in a relatively simple way, and its complex periphery to be expressed in terms of the notion of markedness. As Chomsky (2004) claims, the properties of the language core are to be explained as ‘attributable to general principles’ (see section 2). It is the main objective of the present paper to discuss how the core of language, exhibiting unrestrictedly complex sentences, perhaps could be understood as based on common human mental capacities. In section 3, we consider the possibility that the earliest, and therefore the most basic form of combination is based on information structure, that is, on the distinction between topic and focus. Under this hypothesis, syntactic dependency, or valency,might be taken to be a later development, and we discuss this in section 4.1. In section 4.2, we focus these speculations more narrowly by examining two typologically different languages, English and Czech within the framework of Functional Generative Description (FGD) developed in Prague. In section 5, we show how an empirical foundation might be provided for this view of language by examining underlying syntactic annotations in the Czech Dependency Tree Bank. We show that, while the core of language then can be found to be patterned in a relatively very simple way, coming close to the elementary logic that is presumably a shared human capacity, the complex periphery of the language system is extremely large and complicated (section 6).

Keywords

Contributors

author
  • Linguistica Pragensia- redakce, Ústav pro jazyk český AV ČR, v.v.i., Letenská 4, 118 51 Praha 1, Czech Republic

References

  • Adger, D. (2003): Core syntax. A minimalist approach. Oxford - New York, Oxford University Press.
  • Battistella, E. (1995): Jakobson and Chomsky on markedness. In: Prague Linguistic Circle Papers 1. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Benjamins, 55-72.
  • Böhmová, A. - Hajič, J. - Hajičová, E. - Hladká, B. (2003): The PDT - A 3-level annotational scenario. In: Building and Using Parsed Corpora. Ed. by A. Abeillé. Dordrecht/Boston/London, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 103-127.
  • Braun, B. - Ladd, D. R. (2003): Prosodic correlates of contrastive ad non-contrastive themes in German. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Geneva, 789-792.
  • Chomsky, N. A. (2004): The biolinguistic perspective after 50 years. In: Quaderni del Dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze 3-12, Florence.
  • Erteschik-Shir, N. (1998): The dynamics of focus structure. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 84, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Fillmore, Ch. J. (1968): Lexical entries for verbs. Foundations of Language 4, s. 373-393.
  • Fillmore, Ch. J. - Robinson, C. R. - Petruck, M. R. L. (2003): Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography 16, 235-250.[Crossref]
  • Fintel, K. von (2004): A minimal theory of adverbial quantification. In: Context-Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning, ed. by Hans Kamp and Barbara H. Partee, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 177-186.
  • Firbas, J. (1992): Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge/London, Cambridge - London University Press.
  • Gemoll, W. (1908): Griechisch-deutsches Schulwörterbuch. Vienna, Tempsky - Leipzig, Freytag.
  • Hajič, J. (1998): Building a Syntactically Annotated Corpus: The Prague Dependency Treebank. In: Issues of Valency and Meaning, ed. by Eva Hajičová, Prague, Karolinum, 106-132.
  • Hajič, J. - Hladká, B. (1997): Probabilistic and rule-based tagger of an inflective language. A comparison. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, Washington, D. C., 111-118.
  • Hajičová, E. (1984): Presupposition and allegation revisited. Journal of Pragmatics 8, 155-167.[Crossref]
  • Hajičová, E. (2003): Topic-focus articulation in the Czech National Corpus. In: Hladký, J., ed., 2003, 185-194.
  • Hajičová, E. - Panevová, J. - Sgall, P. (2001): Tectogrammatics in corpus tagging. In: Perspectives on semantics, pragmatics, and discourse. A festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer, ed. by K. István and R. M. Harnish, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins, 293-299.
  • Hajičová, E. - Partee, B. H. - Sgall, P. (1998): Topic-Focus Articulation, Tripartite Structures, and Semantic Content. Dordrecht, Kluwer.
  • Hajičová, E. - Sgall, P. (1980): A dependency based specification of topic and focus. SMIL - Journal of Linguistic Calculus (Stockholm) 1/2, 93-140.
  • Hajičová, E. - Sgall, P. (2005): The position of information structure in the core of language. In: The Partee Effect, ed. by Carlson, G. N. - Pelletier, F. J., Palo Alto, CA, Center for the Study of Language and Information, 289-302.
  • Hajičová, E. - Sgall, P. (in press): The fundamental significance of Information Structure. To appear in Studies in Pragmatics 6, ed. by K. P. Turner - B. Fraser, Bangalore, Macmillan.
  • Hajičová, E. - Sgall, P. - Veselá, K. (2003): Information structure and contrastive topic. In: Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics. The Amherst Meeting 2002, Ann Arbor, Michigan Slavic Publications, 219-234.
  • Hajičová, E. - Sgall, P. - Veselá, K. (in press): Contextual boundness and contrast in the Prague Dependency Treebank. In: Interface and interface conditions, ed. by Späth, A. to be published by de Gruyter.
  • Heim, I. R. (1982): The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst; published 1989, New York, Garland.
  • Hintikka, J. (1970): Knowledge, belief, and logical consequence. Ajatus 32, 32-47.
  • Hladký, J., ed. (2003): Language and function. To the memory of Jan Firbas. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Benjamins.
  • Jacobs, J. (1984): Funktionale Satzperspektive und Illokutionssemantik. LinguistischeBerichte 91, 25-58.
  • Kamp, H. - Partee, B. H., eds. (2004): Context-dependence in the analysis of linguistic meaning. Amsterdam, Elsevier.
  • Karcevskij, S. (1929): Du dualisme asymétrique du signe linguistique. In: Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague 1, 88-93.
  • Koktová, E. (1987): Sentence adverbials in a functional description. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Benjamins.
  • Kruijff-Korbayová, I. - Steedman, M. (2003): Discourse and information structure. In: I. Kruijff-Korbayová and M. Steedman, eds.: Proceedings of the ESSLLI workshop on information structure and discourse semantics. Helsinki. Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1-12.
  • Panevová, J. (2003): Some issues of syntax and semantics of verbal modifications In: Proceedings of MTT 2003 - First International Conference on Meaning-Text Theory. Paris, École normale supérieure, 139-146.
  • Partee, B. H. (1996): Allegation and local accommodation. In: Discourse and meaning, ed. by Partee, B. H. - Sgall, P., Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Benjamins, 65-86.
  • Partee, B. H. (1998): Focus, quantification, and semantics-pragmatics issues. In: Focus. Linguistic, cognitive and computational perspectives, ed. by Bosch, P. - Sandt, R. van der, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 213-231.
  • Petkevič, V. (1995): A new formal specification of underlying structures. Theoretical Linguistics 21, 7-61.
  • Robinson, J. J. (1970): Dependency structures and transformational rules. Language 46, 259-285.
  • Sgall, P. (1967): Functional sentence perspective in a generative description. Prague Studies in Mathematical Linguistics 2, 203-225.
  • Sgall, P. (1994): Meaning, reference and discourse patterns. In: The Prague School of Structural and Functional Linguistics, ed. by Luelsdorff, P., Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Benjamins, 277-309.
  • Sgall, P. (2000): On comparison of approaches (Remarks and illustrations). Linguistica Pragensia X/2, 73-84.
  • Sgall, P. (2003): From functional sentence perspective to topic focus-articulation. In: Hladký, J., ed., 279-287.
  • Sgall, P. (2006): Language in its multifarious aspects. Ed. by Hajičová, E. - Panevová, J., Prague, Karolinum.
  • Sgall, P. - Hajičivá, E. - Benešová, E. (1973): Topic, focus and Generative Semantics. Kronberg/Taunus, Scriptor.
  • Sgall, P. - Hajičová, E. - Panevová, J. (1986): The meaning of the sentence in its semantic and pragmatic aspects, ed. by Mey, J. L., Dordrecht, Reidel/Prague, Academia.
  • Sgall, P. - Pfeiffer, O. - Dressler, W. U. - Půček, M. (1995): Experimental research on systemic ordering. Theoretical Linguistics 21, 197-239.
  • Skalička, V. (1962): Das Wesen der Morphologie und der Syntax. In: Acta Universitatis Carolinae: Slavica Pragensia IV, Prague, Charles University, 123-127.
  • Steedman, M. (1991): Structure and intonation. Language 67, 260-296.
  • Steedman, M. (2000): Information structure and the syntax-phonology interface. Linguistic Inquiry 31, 649-689.
  • Steube, A. (2006): The influence of operators on the interpretation in DPs and PPs in German information structure. In: Molnár, V. - Winkler, S., eds., The Architecture of Focus. Berlin, Mouton De Gruyter.
  • Steube, A. (in press): Operators and information structure: their compositional semantics. In: Steube, A. - Späth, A., eds., Interface and interface conditions. Berlin, Mouton De Gruyter, in print.
  • Vennemann, T. (1974): Zur Theorie der Wortstellungsveränderung: Von SXV zu SVX über TVX. In: G. Dinser, ed., Zur Theorie der Sprachveränderung. Kronberg/Taunus, Scriptor.
  • Veselá, K. - Peterek, N. - Hajičová, E. (2003): Some observations on contrastive topic in Czech spontaneous speech. Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics 79-80, 5-22.
  • Vykypel, B. (2006): Essais zur Prage Typologie (mit einer Bibliographia typologica Pragensis). LINCOM Studies in Language typology 14. LINCOM Europa, Munich.
  • Žabokrtský, Z. (2005): Valency Lexicon of Czech Verbs. Prague, Charles University (Ph.D. dissertation).

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.cejsh-b46edc92-4b82-46e0-8645-378f8ed342d0
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.