PL EN


2011 | 18 | 3 | 363 – 383
Article title

LOOKING FOR LAZY ARGUMENT CANDIDATES

Authors
Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The Lazy Argument, as it is preserved on historical testimonies, is not logically conclusive. In this form, it appears to have been proposed in favour of part-time fatalism (including past time fatalism). The argument assumes that free will assumption is unacceptable from the standpoint of the logical fatalists but plausible for some of the non-universal of part-time fatalists. There are indications that the layout of argument is not genuine, but taken over from a Megarian source and later transformed. The genuine form of the argument seems to be given in different form and far closer to logical fatalism and whose purpose is not to defend laziness. If the historical argument has to lead to the logically satisfactory solution, some additional assumptions and its additional tuning are needed.
Contributors
  • Katedra logiky a metodológie vied, Filozofická fakulta UK, Šafárikovo nám. 6, 814 99 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, marko@fphil.uniba.sk
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.cejsh-b50cd6ee-dc25-4673-9243-703fc223cf16
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.