Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2024 | 31 | 1 | 2 – 21

Article title

SYSTEMATIC ACCOUNT OF THE ARGUMENTATIVE ROLE OF THOUGHT EXPERIMENTS

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
What is the role of thought experiments in scientific exploration? Can they provide us with new knowledge about the world? In a recent article, Lorenzo Sartori argues that thought experiments function like ordinary (material) experiments: Both material experiments and thought experiments are made in a specific context, which must then be extrapolated and generalized to say something true about the world. This article discusses and criticizes Sartori’s proposal. It suggests a new theoretical framework for understanding thought experiments, their argumentative role, and how they provide new knowledge about the world. The presented framework is a coherentist framework, where coherence has three aspects: consistency, cohesiveness, and comprehensiveness. The proposal is that the argumentative role of thought experiments is to demonstrate the presence or absence of consistency, cohesiveness, and comprehensiveness, thereby strengthening a theory, weakening a theory, or showing one theory to be better than another. This is the way thought experiments provides new knowledge about the world, since the way we learn something new about the world is by discovering which theories about the world are most coherent.

Contributors

  • Fjellhaug International University College, Leifsgade 33.6, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark

References

Document Type

Publication order reference

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.cejsh-b953595f-7dfb-4e92-93d6-ab4b3bb00ba3
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.