PL EN


2020 | 75 | 8 | 628 – 643
Article title

POLLOCKOVA KONCEPCIA REVIDOVATEĽNÉHO USUDZOVANIA A KRITIKA ARGUMENTOV

Authors
Content
Title variants
EN
Pollock’s conception of defeasible reasoning and the criticism of arguments
Languages of publication
SK
Abstracts
EN
This paper deals with various ways of criticizing arguments. In particular, I focus on John Pollock’s theory of defeasible reasoning and show that his conception of rebutting and undercutting defeaters omits some important ways of attacking arguments. I discuss not only the tenets of Pollock’s theory but I compare it also to some traditional ways of criticizing arguments occurring in philosophical logic, informal logic and argumentation theory. The paper provides some interesting kinds of counter examples to deductive arguments which play a similar role to those of the undercutting and the rebutting defeaters occurring in case of non-deductive arguments. Finally, I point to a dilemma emerging from the analysis of Pollock’s conception: Either we acknowledge that Pollock’s theory is applicable only to a limited scope of defeasible arguments or we admit that we have to broaden the definition of defeasible arguments in such a way that it covers also deductive arguments. However, the latter option can lead to a conclusion that there are no non defeasible arguments.
Year
Volume
75
Issue
8
Pages
628 – 643
Physical description
Contributors
  • Filozofická fakulta UK v Bratislave, Katedra logiky a metodológie vied, Gondova 2, 811 02 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.cejsh-bd358125-1def-4ffa-9575-7597113de330
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.