SÚBEH REIVINDIKAČNÉHO A ODŠKODŇOVACIEHO NÁROKU

• Authors: Hlušák Milan

Title variants

EN

Concurrence of re-vindication and compensation claim

• Languages of publication: SK

Abstracts

EN

In the paper the author deals with the possibility of concurrence of re-vindication and indemnification claims. Thus, whether, for example, in the case of theft of an object, the owner can claim damages against the thief, even if he could claim against the thief for the return of the object. The author concludes that this is possible. According to him, the damage may also consist in the mere retention of the thing, but only if it is a movable thing and the person retaining it is recklessly withholding it without a willingness to hand it over. The owner will therefore be able to make a claim for damages against him in such a case instead of a claim for replevin. In the author’s opinion, such an approach may help the owner of the movable thing by saving him from a two-round execution (if it is a substitutable thing), or two separate, successive main and execution proceedings (if it is a non-substitutable thing), since instead of having to wait for the result of the execution by taking the thing away, he can claim damages in the first main proceedings.

Keywords

EN

CONCURRENCE OF CLAIMS; VINDICATION CLAIM; COMPENSATION CLAIM

• Publisher: Institute of State and Law of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 106
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 177 – 188

Contributors

author

Hlušák Milan

• Právnická fakulta Trnavskej univerzity v Trnave, Trnava, Slovak Republic

Identifiers

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31577/pravnyobzor.2023.3.01