PL EN


2017 | 24 | 4 | 487 – 510
Article title

HEMPEL’S DILEMMA AND RESEARCH PROGRAMMES: WHY ADDING STANCES IS NOT A BOON

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Hempel’s Dilemma is intended to force physicalists to make an unfavourable choice between the current physics and a future physical theory. The problem with the first horn of the dilemma is related to the fact that current physics is, strictly speaking, inconsistent, while the problem with its second horn is that we do not know how a future, completed physical theory will look like. In this paper, the two strategies of avoiding the dilemma are compared and assessed: the attitudinal approach, according to which physicalism is a stance or an attitude, and Lakatosian approach, according to which physicalism is best understood as a research programme. It is argued that the latter approach ought to be preferred over the former approach because, among other things, it better explains how some physicalists and their opponents sometimes switch the sides, as well as why different physicalists undertake different activities within a given time interval.
Keywords
Contributors
  • Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Čika Ljubina 18-20, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.cejsh-c05c7303-313f-479d-853e-e32d144e3948
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.