Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl
Title variants
How good to know the rules or the security measures for the analytical legal epistemology
Languages of publication
Abstracts
Article responds to post Džačár, L., Foldes, R. Precautionary measures in the new civil trial - selected issues. The article essentially focused on the nature of the Institute’s approach and urgent security measures, with particular emphasis on precautionary measures. Prior to the analysis clarifies the meaning and purpose of recasting, as specific institutes, although well-known civil trial until 30.06.2016 also found in contentious civil right, does not mean that their meaning and function are the same. This stems from the system settings of Civil Procedure within the purview of civil contentious procedure as process modern and dynamic, particularly in contentious proceedings roofed principle of procedural accountability litigants. The essence of this paper is that, among other things, to refute the misconception that urgent measures are provisional measures, and that the precautionary measure is inappropriate institute, incremental and redundant. It is not just a theoretical conclusion, even without a professional basis, cannot access any deeper analysis, and even clues practical issues. Understanding the institute precautionary measure and its meaning so can be themselves (individually), but in the context of the entire recasting whose purpose is not to look back, the team behind what has been, on the contrary adjust account the new Civil Procedure.
Keywords
Year
Volume
Issue
Pages
115 – 130
Physical description
Contributors
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.cejsh-d3f2da3f-41f6-406a-88d5-c4b26b397be5
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.