Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2021 | 43 | 179-205

Article title

An analysis of certification processes for Good Clinical Practice and project management competencies

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
Aim/purpose–The purpose of this paper is to clarify the certification process of the Good Clinical Practice (GCP) competencies based on a comparison with the project management (PM) certification process. This aim was accomplished by model development. Originality/value/contribution –The paper raises research topics at the crossroads of project management, clinical trials, and GCP, topics that have been underdeveloped so far. The results might be significant for all organizations involved in conducting clinical research projects. The findings contribute to the quality of clinical trials and provide public assurance that the rights, safety, and well-being of trial subjects are protected and the clinical trial data are credible. Design/methodology/approach–The study was divided into three main phases: 1st phase –the identification of key characteristics of PM and GCP certification processes, 2nd phase –the development of certification models for PM and GCP, 3rd phase –the conclusions from in-depth interviews. Findings–As a result of the research, key characteristics of PM and GCP certification processes were identified, certification models for PM and GCP were developed. In addition, based on conclusions from in-depth interviews, solutions for organizing the way of confirming knowledge of GCP guidelines were proposed. Research implications/limitations–The proposed rules may be too complex and may exceed the needs and expectations of the clinical trial environment. The models focus on stakeholder relations, without the rules of certification granting procedures, to enable broader contextualization of the issues discussed in the paper. The analysis might be fragmented as it regards the sole certification process. The research refers to Poland only, hence it will be valuable to identify whether foreign authorities have the same attitude to the GCP competency certification model. It is recommended to increase the number of respondents’ interviews to obtain results of higher validity and reliability.

Year

Volume

43

Pages

179-205

Physical description

Contributors

author
  • Chair of Management Processes. Faculty of Management. Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland
  • Department of Scientific Research and International Cooperation. Division Clinical Trials The Children’s Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland

References

  • American Association of Legal Nurse Consultants. (n.d.). Certification vs. certificate. Retrieved from http://www.aalnc.org/page/certification-vs.-certificate
  • American Society for Engineering Management [ASEM]. (n.d.). Overview of the ASEM certification options. Retrieved from https://www.asem.org/Education/Certification
  • APMG. (n.d.). Certifications & solutions. Retrieved from https://apmg-international.com/ certifications-solutions
  • Axelos. (n.d.). What is ITIL®? Retrieved from https://www.axelos.com/best-practice-solutions/itil/what-is-itil
  • Blomquist, T., Farashah, A. D., & Thomas, J. (2018). Feeling good, being good and looking good: Motivations for, and benefits from, project management certification. International Journal of Project Management, 36(3), 498-511. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.11.006
  • Bracewell, N., & Winchester, D. E. (2021). Accreditation in health care: Does it make any difference to patient outcomes? BMJ Quality & Safety. https://doi.org/10.1136/ bmjqs-2020-012533
  • Calza, E., & Goedhuys, M. (2021, February). Just a piece of paper? Domestic standards certification and small firm growth in Viet Nam. The Journal of Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2021.1873289
  • Cambridge Dictionary. (n.d.). Meaning of certification in English. Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/certification
  • Catanio, J., Armstrong, G., & Tucker, J. (2013, February). Project management certification and experience: The impact on the triple constraint. Journal of Advances in Information Technology, 4(1), 8-19. https://doi.org/10.4304/jait.4.1.8-19
  • Cheng, L. T. W., Sharma, P., Shen, J., & Ng, A. C. C. (2021, April). Exploring the dark side of third-party certification effect in B2B relationships: A professional financial services perspective. Journal of Business Research, 127, 123-136. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.031
  • Cilenti, D. (2021). Innovation theory and local health department accreditation. American Journal of Public Health, 111(2), 183-184. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020. 306076
  • Construction Management Association of America [CMAA]. (n.d.). Certification. Retrieved from https://www.cmaanet.org/certification
  • Doganov, B. K., & Yanev, S. (2006). Implementation of project management principles in clinical trial process. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2006-EMEA, Madrid, Spain. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. Retrieved from https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/project-management-principles-clinical-trial-pharmaceutical-8206
  • Directive 2001/20/EC. On the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. European Parliament, Council of the European Union. Retrieved from https://ec. europa.eu/health//sites/health/files/files/eudralex/vol-1/dir_2001_20/dir_2001_20_ en.pdf
  • Directive 2005/28/EC. Laying down principles and detailed guidelines for good clinical practice as regards investigational medicinal products for human use, as well as the requirements for authorisation of the manufacturing or importation of such products. European Commission. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/ 2005/28/oj
  • Englev, E., & Petersen, K. P. (2003). ICH-GCP Guideline: kvalitetssikring af kliniske laegemiddelforsøg. Status og perspektiver [ICH-GCP Guideline: quality assurance of clinical trials. Status and perspectives]. Ugeskrift for laeger, 165(16), 1659-1662.
  • European Medicines Agency. (2002, July). ICH topic E 6 (R1) guideline for good clinical practice. Retrieved from https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/ich-e6-r1-guideline-good-clinical-practice_en.pdf
  • Fougerou-Leurent, C., Chesnais, J., Nekmouche, S., Veislinger, A., Le Saux, M., Joumard, C., Lorre, V., Bellot, C., Alleton, N., Labourdette, E., Marie, C., Fin, L., Bellissant, E., & Laviolle, B. (2020). Enquête sur la certification aux bonnes pratiques cliniques en recherche académique [A survey on French hospital physicians’ certification to the Good Clinical Practices]. Therapie, 75(6), 537-542.https://doi. org/10.1016/j.therap.2020.04.002
  • Gasik, S. (2010). A model of project knowledge management. Project Management Journal, 42(3), 23-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20239
  • Goodarzynejad, H., & Babamahmoodi, A. (2015, August). Project management of randomized clinical trials: A narrative review. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 17(8), e11602. https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.11602
  • Haeusler, J.-M. C. (2009). Certification in Good Clinical Practice and clinical trial quality: A retrospective analysis of protocol adherence in four multicenter trials in the USA. Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs, 26(1-2), 20-23. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/10601330902911893
  • Hallgren, M., Nilsson, A., Blomquist, T., & Soderholm, A. (2012). Relevance lost! A critical review of project management standardisation. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(3), 457-485. https://doi.org/10.1108/175383712 11235326
  • Hulihan, E. W. (2017). Good Clinical Practice: A question & answer reference guide. Needham, MA: Barnett International.
  • Institute for Credentialing Excellence. (2010). Defining features of quality certification and assessment-based certificate programs. Washington, D.C.: Author.
  • International Project Management Association. (n.d.). Become recognised as a professional – certification. Retrieved from https://www.ipma.world/individuals/ certification/
  • Jones, A., & Shideh, R. (2021). The significance of knowledge management in the knowledge economy of the 21st century. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 15(2), 366-377.
  • Juchniewicz, M. (2018). Projektyzacja – koncepcja, zakres, konsekwencje [Projectification – concept, scope, consequences]. Studia i Prace. Kolegium Zarządzania i Fi-nansów, 159, 43-58.
  • Kerzner, H. (2013). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Kohl, H. (2020). Certification and accreditation: Types and rules. In Standards for management systems. Management for professionals (pp. 669-688). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35832-7_8
  • Legard, R., Keegan, J., & Ward, K. (2014). In-depth interviews. In J. Ritchie, & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and re-searchers (2nd ed., pp. 138-139). London: Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Pub-lications.
  • Nazeer, J., & Marnewick, C. (2018). Investing in project management certification: Do organisations get their money’s worth? Information Technology and Manage-ment, 19(1), 4, 51-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-017-0275-y
  • Nowicki, P., & Kafel, P. (2021). Remote certification processes during global pandemic times. SHS Web of Conf, 92, Article 01037, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/ 20219201037
  • Oleksyn, T. (2010). Zarządzanie kompetencjami. Teoria i praktyka [Competence management. Theory and practice]. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
  • Parvathaneni, M., Pattarkine, M., & Chappidi, D. (2018). Implementation of project management in clinical research. Inventi Rapid: Clinical Research, 2018(1), 1-6.
  • Patalas-Maliszewska, J. (2019). Modele referencyjne w zarządzaniu wiedzą w przedsiębiorstwie produkcyjnym [Reference models for knowledge management in a production company]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Pawlak, M. (2006). Zarządzanie projektami [Project management]. Warszawa: Wydaw-nictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Pietras, P., & Szmit, M. (2003). Zarządzanie projektami. Wybrane metody i techniki [Project management. Selected methods and techniques]. Łódź: Oficyna Księgar-sko-Wydawnicza „Horyzont”.
  • Prawelska-Skrzypek, G., & Jałocha, B. (2014). Projektyzacja sektora publicznego w Polsce – implikacje dla samorządu terytorialnego [Public sector projectification in Poland – implications for local government]. Zarządzanie Publiczne, 3(27), 273-284. https://doi.org/10.4467/20843968ZP.14.023.2767
  • Project Management Institute. (n.d.). Certifications. Retrieved from https://www. pmi.org/certifications
  • Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research. (n.d.). Certificate versus certification. Retrieved from https://www.primr.org/certificates/
  • PwC. (2015). Badania kliniczne w Polsce [Clinical trials in Poland]. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.pl/pl/pdf/clinical-trials-in-poland-pwc-report.pdf
  • Quality Magazine. (2016, November). Certificates vs. certifications. Retrieved from https://www.qualitymag.com/articles/93658-certificates-vs-certifications
  • Regulation 536/2014. On clinical trials on medicinal products for human use, and repealing Directive 2001/20/EC. European Parliament, Council of the European Un-ion. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/files/eudralex/vol-1/reg_2014_536/reg_2014_536_en.pdf
  • Remer, D. S., & Ross, E. M. (2014). Review of project and engineering management certification offered by professional organizations. Engineering Management Jour-nal, 26(4), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2014.11432023
  • Rozporządzenie Ministra Zdrowia z dnia 2 maja 2012 r. w sprawie Dobrej Praktyki Klinicznej [Regulation of the Minister of Health of 2 May 2012 on Good Clinical Practice]. Retrieved from http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=wdu 20120000489
  • Scrum Alliance. (n.d.). Certification types & tracks. Retrieved from https://www. scrumalliance.org/get-certified
  • Schmidt, R., Bell, R., & Warren, V. (2021). Keeping the wheels of the automotive industry turning: The use of tacit knowledge by product development workers in a mul-tinational automotive manufacturer. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-07-2020-0257
  • Shirley, D. (2020). Project management for healthcare. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.
  • Starkweather, J. A., & Stevenson, D. H. (2010). PMP® certification as a core competency: Necessary but not sufficient. Project Management Journal, 42(1), 31-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20174
  • Strojny, J., & Szmigiel, K. (2015). Analiza porównawcza podejść w zakresie zarządzania projektami [Comparative analysis of project management approaches]. Modern Management Review, XX(22/3), 249-265. https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2015.mmr.48
  • Swain, N. (2000). Project management certification. Info World, 22(44), 79-88.
  • Swapan, B., & Bhaswati, S. (2020). Importance of international accreditation for institutions and the role of private certification bodies. Asian Journal of Management, 11(3), 39-43. https://doi.org/10.5958/2321-5763.2020.00043.8
  • The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. (1996). Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6(R1). ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Retrieved from https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/ ich-e6-r2-good-clinical-practice
  • The United States Food and Drug Administration. (2018). E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice: Integrated addendum to ICH E6(R1) guidance for industry. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/media/93884/download
  • TransCelerate Biopharma Inc. (n.d.). GCP mutual recognition. Retrieved from https:// transceleratebiopharmainc.com/gcp-training-attestation/
  • Urząd Rejestracji Produktów Leczniczych, Wyrobów Medycznych i Produktów Bi-obójczych [Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Bi-ocidal Products]. (2020). Biuletyn produktów leczniczych ludzkich 2019 [Human medicinal products bulletin 2019]. Retrieved from http://urpl.gov.pl/sites/ default/files/zalaczniki/Biuletyn%20URPL%202019_PL.PDF
  • Ustawa z dnia 6 września 2001 r. Prawo farmaceutyczne [Act of 6 September 2001. Pharmaceutical law]. Retrieved from https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails. xsp?id=WDU20011261381
  • Wang, X., Zhang, X., Xiong, H., & de Pablos, P. O. (2020). KM 3.0: Knowledge management computing under digital economy. In F. Matos, V. Vairinhos, I. Salavisa, L. Edvinsson, & M. Massaro (Eds.), Knowledge, people, and digital transformation. contributions to management science (pp. 207-217). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40390-4_13
  • Wawak, S. (2009, June). Certyfikacja [Certification]. Retrieved from https://wawak.pl/ pl/content/certyfikacja
  • Wells, H. (2012). How effective are project management methodologies? An explorative evaluation of their benefits in practice. Project Management Journal, 43(6), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21302
  • World Bank. (2007). Building knowledge economies. Washington, D.C.: Author.
  • World Medical Association. (2020, July). WMA Declaration of Helsinki – ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Retrieved from https:// www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/
  • Yıldız, M. S., Öztürk, Z., Topal, M., & Khan, M. M. (2019). Effect of accreditation and certification on the quality management system: Analysis based on Turkish hospitals. International Journal of Health Planning & Management, 34(4), e1675-e1687. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2880

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

ISSN
1732-1948

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.cejsh-de80d30c-cde7-458f-b79e-a4165d0d15c1
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.