2018 | 33 | 25-38
Article title

Organizational learning, organizational innovation and organizational performance: Empirical evidence among selected manufacturing companies in Lagos metropolis, Nigeria

Title variants
Languages of publication
Aim/purpose – The main purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between organizational learning, organizational i nnovation and organizational performance in Nigerian environment. The three hypotheses tested were consonant with the objectives of the study. Design/methodology/approach – Descriptive survey research method was used, pur- posive sampling method was used to select pa rticipants for the study and questionnaire administration engaged as instrument to elicit information from the participants. Kendall’s tau b correlation coefficient statistical technique adopted. Findings – The study confirmed that organizati onal learning had a positive correlation with organizational innovation; organization in novation in turn had positive correlation with organizational performance and organiza tional learning also had positive correla- tion with organizational performances. Research implications – The study looked at relations hip between organizational learn- ing, organizational innovation and organizati onal performance in relation to manufactur- ing industry in Nigeria. Originality/value/contribution – The study used non-financial perspectives, product, process, technology and non-technological i nnovations to establish may be relationships exist between the three constructs.
Physical description
  • Department of Business Administration. Faculty of Management Sciences. Lagos State University, Ojo, Lagos, Nigeria
  • Department of Business Administration. Faculty of Management Sciences. Lagos State University, Ojo, Lagos, Nigeria
  • Alegre, J., & Chivab, R. (2008). Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: An empirical test. Technovation, 28(6), 315-26. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.09.003
  • Antony, J. P., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2010). Measuring organizational performance and organizational excellence of SMEs - Part 2: An empirical study on SMEs in India. Measuring Business Excellence, 14(3), 42-52. doi: 0.1108/13683041011074209
  • Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
  • Asika, N. (2008). Research methodology in the behavioural sciences. Lagos: Longman Nigeria.
  • Avcı, U., Kılınc, I., & Okumus, F. (2010). Relationship among learning levels: An investigation in hotel companies. Ege Academic Review, 10(1), 95-115.
  • Babbie, E. (2005). The basic of social research (3rd ed.). Canada: Thomson Learning.
  • Calhoun, J., & Douglas, A. (2015). An analysis of hospitality and tourism research: Learning organization's influence on sustainability practice. In A. A. Camillo (Ed.), Handbook of research on global hospitality and tourism management (1st ed., pp. 359-381). IGI Global: Panayides.
  • Cefis, E., & Marsili, O. (2005). A matter of life and death: Innovation and firm survival. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(6), 1167-1192. doi: 10.1093/icc/dth081
  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. Retrieved from
  • Cooper, D. R.. & Schindler. P. S. (2005). Business research methods (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Dodgson, M (1993). Organizational learning: A review of some literatures. Organization Studies, 14(3), 375-394. doi: 10.1177/017084069301400303
  • Frank, H., Kessler, A., Mitterer, G. & Weismeier-Sammer, D. (2012). Learning orientation SMEs and its impact on firm performance. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 6(3), 29-41.
  • Garvin, D. A. (2000). Learning in action: A guide to putting the learning organization to work. Boston: HBSP.
  • Gentry, R. J. P., & Shen, W. P. (2010). The relationship between accounting and market measures of firm financial performance: How strong is it? Journal of Managerial Issues, 22(4), 514-530. Retrieved from
  • Goh, S. C., Elliott, C., & Quon, T. (2012). The relationship between learning capability and Organizational performance: Meta-analytic examination. The Learning Organization, 19(2), 92-108. doi: 10.1108/09696471211201461
  • Gupta, P. D., Guha, S., & Krishnaswami, S. S. (2013). Firm growth and its determinants. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2(15), 1-14. doi:10.1186/2192-5372-2-15
  • Harbour, J. L. (2008). The performance paradox: Understanding the real drivers that critically affect outcomes. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  • Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88-115. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.88
  • Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., Griffith, D. A., Chabowski, B. R., Hamman, M. K., & Dykes, B. J. (2008). An assessment of the measurement of performance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6), 1064- 1080. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400398
  • Hung, R. Y. Y., Yang, B., Ya-Hui Lien, B., McLean, G. N., & Kuo, Y.-M. (2010). Dynamic capability: Impact of process alignment and organizational learning culture on performance. Journal of World Business, 45, 285-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb. 2009.09.003
  • Imran, M., Rizvi, S. H. M., & Ali, B. (2011). Impact of organizational learning on organizational performance. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(4), 424-428.
  • Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 408-417. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres. 2010.09.010
  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The strategy focused organization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Kothari, C. R., & Garg, G. (2016). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (3rd ed.). New Delhi: New Age International (P).
  • Kuo, T. H. (2011). How to improve organizational performance through learning and knowledge. International Journal of Manpower, 23(5/6), 581-603. doi: 10.1108/ 01437721111158215
  • Likar, B., Kopa, J., & Fatur, P. (2014). Innovation investment and economic performance in transition economies: Evidence from Slovenia. Innovation: Management, Policy Practice, 16(1), 53-66. doi: 10.5172/impp.2014.16.1.53
  • Maktabi, S. H., & Khazaei, A. (2014). The impact of organizational learning on organizational performance and organizational innovation: Evidence from Bank Industry of Iran. International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sciences, 3(10), 569-573.
  • Murray, P. (2003). Organizational learning, competencies and firm performance: Empirical observations. The Learning Organization, 10(5), 305-316. doi: 10.1108/ 09696470310486656
  • Nawaz, M. S., Hassan, M., & Shaukat, S. (2014). Impact of knowledge management practices on firm performance: Testing the mediation role of innovation in the manufacturing sector of Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Commerce & Social Sciences, 8(1), 99-111.
  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. (2015, February). Innovation in science technology and industry. International Conference on Innovation for Inclusive Growth, New Delhi, India.
  • Panayides, P. M. (2007). Effects of organizational learning in third-party logistics. Journal of Business Logistics, 28(2), 133-158. doi: 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2007.tb00061.x
  • Peterson, W., Gijsbers, G., & Wilks, M. (2003): An organizational performance assessment system for agricultural research organizations: Concepts, methods, and procedures. ISNAR Research Management Guidelines (7) International Service for National Agricultural Research, The Hague.
  • Prieto, I. M., & Revilla, E. (2006). Learning capability and business performance: A non-financial and financial assessment. The Learning Organization, 13, 166-185. doi: 10.1108/09696470610645494
  • Qingmin, H., Helmut, K., & Juergen, M. (2012). How does organizational structure influence performance through learning and innovation in Austria and China? Chinese Management Studies, 6(1), 36-52. doi: 10.1108/17506141211213717
  • Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363-377. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.29.3363
  • Rhee, J., Park, T., & Lee, D. H. (2010). Drivers of innovativeness and performance for innovative SMEs in South Korea: Mediation of learning orientation. Technovation, 30(1), 65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.04.008
  • Robson, C. (2002). Real world research (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Rouse, W. B. (2013). Coping with complexity. TechNews, 17(1), 22.
  • Ryals, L., & Knox, S. (2001). Cross-functional issues in the implementation of relationship marketing through customer relationship management. European Management Journal, 19(5), 534-542. doi: 10.1016/S0263-2373(01)00067-6
  • Salim, I. M., & Sulaiman M. (2011). Organizational learning, innovation and performance: A study of Malaysian small and medium sized enterprises. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(12), 118-125. doi: 10.5539/ijbm
  • Santos-Vijande, M. L., López-Sánchez, J. Á., & Trespalacios, J. A. (2012). How organizational Learning affects a firm’s flexibility, competitive strategy, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 65, 1079-1089. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.09.002
  • Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students (5th ed.). Essex: Pearson Education.
  • Schmidt, T., & Rammer, C. (2006). The determinants and effects of technological and non-technological innovations – evidence from the German CIS IV. Retrieved from
  • Sundbo, J. (2003). Innovation and strategic reflexivity: An evolutionary approach applied to services. Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Ting, K. S. (2012). How accumulation of intellectual capital of IC design firms listed in Taiwan Impacts organization performances: Organizational learning capability as the mediator. The Journal of Global Business Management, 8(1), 60-73.
  • Tippins, M. J., & Sohi, R. S. (2003). IT competency and firm performance: Is organizational learning a missing link? Strategic Management Journal, 24(8), 745-761.
  • Trott, P. (2008). Innovation management and new product development (4th ed.). Prentice Hall: Financial Times.
  • Tsao, S. M., & Lien, W. H. (2013). Family management and internationalization: The impact on firm performance and innovation. Management International Review, 53(2), 189-213. doi: 10.1007/s11575-011-0125-9
  • Useem, M. (1993). Executive defense: Shareholder power and corporate reorganization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Ussahawanitchakit, P. (2008). Impacts of organizational learning on innovation orientation and firm efficiency: An empirical assessment of accounting firms in Thailand. International Journal of Business Research, 8(4), 1-12.
  • de Waal, A., & Sultan, S. (2012). Applicability of the high performance organization framework in the Middle East: The case of Palestine Polytechnic University. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 5(3), 213-223. doi: 10.1108/17537981211265598
  • Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1996). In action: Creating the learning organization. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.
  • Zhi-hong, S. (2015). Organizational learning, absorptive capacity, imitation and innovation: Empirical analyses of 115 firms across China. Chinese Management Studies, 9(1), 97-113. doi: 10.1108/CMS-05-2014-0092
  • Zohoori, M., Mohseni, S., Samadi, B., & Attarnezhad, O. (2013). The relationship between knowledge sharing and innovation in electronic industry in Iran. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship Development, 1(1), 26-33.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.