FILOZOFIE ANALYTICKÁ VS KONTINENTÁLNÍ: NA OBRANU DĚLENÍ

• Authors: Dragoun Ivo

Title variants

EN

Analytic vs continental philosophy: In defence of the division

• Languages of publication: CS

Abstracts

EN

In his On the Very Analytic-Continental Division in Philosophy, Šebela presents three objections against dividing contemporary philosophy into analytic and continental. He calls them a factual objection, a methodological objection, and a power objection. In this paper, I will scrutinize the three objections and show that each of them ultimately fails. My motivation is to clear the theoretical path for those who wish to explore and reflect on the fascinating methodological presuppositions that constitute the division of contemporary philosophy into analytic and continental.

Keywords

EN

ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY; CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY; DIVISION; METHODOLOGY

• Publisher: Institute of Philosophy, Slovak Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Filozofia (Philosophy)
• Year: 2025
• Volume: 80
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 441 – 452

Contributors

author

Dragoun Ivo

• Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, Filozofická fakulta, Křižkovského 12, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4189-8657

Identifiers

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2025.80.3.12