PL EN


2020 | 41 | 47-68
Article title

Comparing current and future knowledge sharing with enterprises by Poland-and UK-based prosumers

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
Aim/purpose –The purpose of the paper is to improve understanding of the process activities that Poland-based and UK-based prosumers engage in for current and future knowledge sharing with enterprises. It explores the Poland-based and UK-based prosumer differences and similarities in terms of their engagement with enterprise products and service offerings. Design/methodology/approach–The reported outcomes result from a survey that yielded 171 prosumers responses from the United Kingdom and 783 from Poland. The APQC framework is used as a means to establish the product versus service activities that appear to influence prosumers most in their knowledge sharing. Findings–The findings show that Poland-based prosumers currently share knowledge marginally more than their counterparts in the UK. However, Poland based prosumers are more willing, in fact twice as likely, to share knowledge in the future in relation to product offerings including (P3) materials from which products were made, followed closely by (P6) ease and intuitiveness of product use, (P4) designing package or graphic elements of the product and (S4) establishing new channels of sale. Research implications/limitations–In particular, the results reveal that both the Po-land-based and UK-based prosumers want to engage with enterprises in sharing knowledge related to the ordering process, handling complaints and customer services. Originality/value/contribution–This finding is relevant to any enterprises that may like to engage prosumers in providing feedback about their specific product and service offerings.
Year
Volume
41
Pages
47-68
Physical description
Contributors
  • Institute of Management and Health. University of Wales Trinity Saint David, UK
  • Faculty of Business and Society. University of South Wales, UK
  • Faculty of Finance and Insurance. University of Economics in Katowice, Poland
author
  • Faculty of Finance and Insurance. University of Economics in Katowice, Poland
References
  • Aghamirian, B., Dorri, B., & Aghamirian, B. (2013). Effects of customer knowledge management’s eight factors in e-commerce. Management Science and Engineering, 7(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3968/3945
  • APQC. (2018). Process Classification Framework [online]. Houston: American Productivity and Quality Center. Retrieved January 20, 2017 from http://www.apqc.org/pcf
  • Baumol, W. J. (1983). Contestable markets: An uprising in the theory of industry struc-ture. American Economic Review, 73(3), 491-496.
  • Brabham, D. C. (2012). Motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application to improve public engagement in transit planning. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 40(3), 307-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2012.693940
  • Bylok, F. (2013). Konsumpcja, konsument i społeczeństwo konsumpcyjne we współczesnym świecie [Consumption, the consumer and the consumer society in the modern world]. Katowice: Śląsk.
  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2007). Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2). Retrieved from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/ article/why-companies-should-have-open-business-models/
  • Cui, A. S., & Wu, F. (2015, March). Utilizing customer knowledge in innovation: Ante-cedents and impact of customer involvement on new product performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0433-x
  • Fine, M. B., Gironda, J., & Petrescu, M. (2017). Prosumer motivations for electronic word-of-mouth communication behaviors. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 8(2), 280-295. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-09-2016-0048
  • Geri, N., Gafni, R., & Bengov, P. (2017). Crowdsourcing as a business model: Extrinsic motivations for knowledge sharing in user-generated content websites. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 10(1), 90-111. https://doi.org/10.1108 /JGOSS-052016-0018
  • Hernández-Serrano, M. J., Renés-Arellano, P., Graham, G., & Greenhill, A. (2017). From prosumer to prodesigner: Participatory news consumption. Comunicar, 25(50), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.3916/C50-2017-07
  • Hinton, P. R., Brownlow, C., McMurray, I., & Cozens, B. (2004). SPSS explained. Lon-don: Routledge.
  • Law, M., Lau, T., & Wong, Y. H. (2003). From customer relationship management to customer-managed relationship: Unravelling the paradox with a co-creative per-spective. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 21(1), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1108 /02634500310458153
  • Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2006). Service-dominant logic: Reactions, reflections, and refinements. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 281-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593106 066781
  • Martínez-Cañas, R., Ruiz-Palomino, P., Linuesa-Langreo, J., & Blázquez-Resino, J. J. (2016). Consumer participation in co-creation: An enlightening model of causes and effects based on ethical values and transcendent motives. Frontiers in Psychol- ogy, 7(973), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00793
  • Mazurek, M., & Hilton, M. (2007). Consumerism, solidarity and communism: Consumer protection and the consumer movement in Poland. Journal of Contemporary Histo- ry, 42(2), 315-343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022009407075553
  • O’Brien, C. (2011). The emergence of the social media empowered consumer. Irish Marketing Review, 21(1&2), 32-40.
  • Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2002). An eBusiness model ontology for modeling eBusiness. BLED 2002 Proceedings. 15th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference, Bled, Slovenia.
  • Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2013). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers and challengers. Oxford: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1007 /s11747-007-0070-0
  • Planells, A. J. (2015). Video games and the crowdfunding ideology: From the gamer- -buyer to the prosumer-investor. Journal of Consumer Culture, 17(3), 620-638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540515611200
  • Porter, M. E. (1985) Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.
  • Rayna, T., & Striukova, L. (2016). Involving consumers: The role of digital technologies in promoting ‘prosumption’ and user innovation. Journal of the Knowledge Econ- omy, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0390-8
  • Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson, N. (2010). Production, consumption, prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540509354673
  • Song, E.-J., & Kang, M.-S. (2016). A study on the platform of knowledge integration for customer feedback in B2C service industry. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 8(1), 26-36. https://doi.org/10.1504/ ijict.2016. 073637
  • Taherparvar, N., Esmaeilpour, R., & Dostar, M. (2014). Customer knowledge manage- ment, innovation capability, and business performance: A case study of the banking industry. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(18). Retrieved May 12, 2014 from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=1367-3270&volume=18& issue=3
  • Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2006). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. New York: Penguin Group.
  • Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. New York: Bantam Books.
  • Tsai, W., Tsai, M., Li, S., & Lin, C. (2012). Harmonizing firms’ knowledge and strate-gies with organizational capabilities. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 53(1), 23-32.
  • Tseng, S.-M. (2016). The effect of knowledge management capability and customer knowledge gaps on corporate performance. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 29(1), 5171. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-03-2015-0021
  • Xie, C., Bagozzi, R. P., & Troye, S. V. (2008). Trying to prosumer: Toward a theory of consumers as co-creators of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 109-122.
  • Ziemba, E., & Eisenbardt, M. (2015a). Examining prosumers participation in business processes. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 12(1), 219-229.
  • Ziemba, E., & Eisenbardt, M. (2015b). Prosumers’ participation in business processes. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, 3(1), 114-127. Retrieved from http://www.iiakm.org/ojakm/articles/2015/volume3_1/OJAKM_Volume3_1pp114-127.pdf
  • Ziemba, E., & Eisenbardt, M. (2017). Utilization of consumers’ knowledge in organiza-tions. In F. Marimon, M. Mas-Machuca, J. Berbegal-Mirabent, & R. Bastida (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Knowledge Management ECKM 2017, September 7-8 (Vol. 2, pp. 1084-1093). Barcelona: International University of Catalonia.
  • Ziemba, E., Eisenbardt, M., & Mullins, R. (2017). Use of information and communica-tion technologies for knowledge sharing by Polish and UK-based prosumers. In: E. Ziemba (Ed.), Information Technology for Management: New Ideas and Real Solutions (Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, No. 277; pp. 49-73). Swit-zerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53076-5_4
  • Ziemba, E., Eisenbardt, M., Mullins, R., & Grabara, D. (2018). Prosumers knowledge sharing to develop and manage products. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, 6(2), 72-91. https://doi.org/10.36965/OJAKM.2018.6(2)72-91
  • Ziemba, E., & Mullins, R. (2016). Identifying more about customers: The phenomenon of the switch to the knowledge exchange. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, 4(1), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.36965/OJAKM.2016.4(1)165-179
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
ISSN
1732-1948
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.cejsh-e34d0f08-219c-49ce-a9eb-80a55bc33154
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.