PL EN


2017 | 72 | 3 | 162 – 172
Article title

JE ROZLIŠOVANIE DVOCH DRUHOV „KRESŤANSKEJ FILOZOFIE“ ZMYSLUPLNÉ?

Authors
Title variants
EN
Is the distinction between two kinds of “Christian philosophy” meaningful?
Languages of publication
SK
Abstracts
EN
The paper deals with an attractive distinction between two kinds of Christian philosophy according to Winfried Löffler, who claims that: i) there are two basic (irreducible to each other) kinds of Christian philosophy, namely Augustinian and Thomistic; ii) Thomistic is more preferable, because it is immune to questionable blending philosophy and theology. The core of the study is the critique of Löffler’s argumentation: First, it disputes plausibility of the sharp distinction between the two kinds of Christian philosophy. Second, it criticizes the idea of neutral premises in philosophy. Third, it attacks the theory of “patching up the gaps” in our knowledge with theological premises.
Year
Volume
72
Issue
3
Pages
162 – 172
Physical description
Contributors
author
  • Katedra filozofie Filozofická fakulta KU v Ružomberku, Ružomberok, Slovak Republic
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.cejsh-e37f1c66-32c9-4215-b5ba-18338ef987e7
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.