Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2016 | 11 | 104-124

Article title

A Model to Support Negotiations on the Electricity Market

Authors

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
Liberalization on the electricity market in Poland is related to the possibility of free choice of electricity supplier. On a liberalized market, suppliers have to compete to gain new customers and retain the old ones. The suppliers have to satisfy the customers’ needs − which are more and more complex − and customize their approach. Therefore, negotiations of electricity sale conditions become an usual practice. The purpose of this study is to propose a way of supporting the negotiation process of electricity sale conditions between a supplier and a customer. To solve this problem, the scoring method has been used.

Year

Volume

11

Pages

104-124

Physical description

Contributors

  • University of Economics in Katowice. Faculty of Informatics and Communication. Department of Operations Research. Poland

References

  • Brams S.J. (1990), Negotiation Games: Applying Game Theory to Bargaining and Arbitration, Routledge, New York.
  • Brazier F., Cornelissena F., Gustavssonb R., Jonkera C.M., Lindebergb O., Polaka B., Treura J. (2002), A Multi-agent System Performing One-to-many Negotiation for Load Balancing of Electricity Use, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 1, Iss. 2, Summer, 208-224.
  • Churchman C.W., Ackoff R. (1954), An Approximate Measurement of Value, Journal of Operations Research Society of America, 2(1), 172-181.
  • Gupta S., Livne Z.A. (1988), Resolving a Conflict Situation with a Reference Outcome: An Axiomatic Model, Management Science Archive, Vol. 34, Iss. 11, 1303-1314.
  • Hwang C.L., Yoon K. (1981), Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  • Kalai E., Smorodinsky M. (1975), Other Solutions to Nash's Bargaining Problem, Econometrica, 43, 513-518.
  • Kaleta M., Pałka P., Toczyłowski E., Traczyk T. (2009), Electronic Trading on Electricity Markets within a Multi-agent Framework, Computational Collective Intelligence. Semantic Web, Social Networks and Multiagent Systems, Vol. 5796 of the series Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 788-799.
  • Keeney R.L., Raiffa H. (1976), Decisions with Multiple Objectives, Wiley, New York.
  • Kersten G., Michalowski W., Cray D., Lee I. (1991), An Analytic Basis for Decision Support in Negotiations, Naval Logistic Research, 38.
  • Konarzewska-Gubała E. (1989), Bipolar, Multiple Criteria Decision Aid Using the Bipolar Reference System, LAMSADE, Universite Paris IX, Cahiers et Documents.
  • Kopańska-Bródka D., Wachowicz T. (2013), Postnegocjacyjna optymalizacja kompromisu negocjacyjnego [w:] S. Stanek, T. Wachowicz (red.), Autonomiczne systemy negocjacji, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach 138/2013, 51-78.
  • Kudyba D. (2014), Energy Hedging Using Goal Programming, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Vol. 9, UE, Katowice.
  • Marcinkowska M. (2009), Standardy kapitałowe banków. Bazylejska Nowa Umowa Kapitałowa w polskich regulacjach nadzorczych, Regan Press, Gdańsk.
  • Nash J. (1950), The Bargaining Problem, Econometrica, 18, 155-162.
  • Nash J. (1953), Two-Person Cooperative Games, Econometrica, 21, 129-140.
  • Opricovic S. (1998), Multicriteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade.
  • Raiffa H. (1953), Arbitration Schemes for Generalized Two-person Games [w:] H.W. Kuhn, A.W. Tucker (eds.), Contributions to the Theory of Games, Vol. II, Princeton University Press, Cambridge (MA).
  • Raiffa H. (1982), The Art and Science of Negotiation, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
  • Raiffa H., Richardson J., Metcalfe D. (2002), Negotiation Analysis, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
  • Saaty T.L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • Simoms T., Tripp T.M. (2003), The Negotiation Checklist [w:] R.J. Lewiski, D.M. Saunders, J.W. Minton, B. Barry (eds.), Negotiation. Reading Exercises and Cases, Fourth Edition, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York.
  • Trzaskalik T. (ed.) (2014), Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji. Metody i zastosowania, PWE, Warszawa.
  • Wachowicz T. (2006), E-negocjacje. Modelowanie, analiza i wspomaganie, Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej, Katowice.
  • Wachowicz T. (2013), Metody wielokryterialne we wspomaganiu prenegocjacyjnego przygotowania negocjatorów, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego, Katowice.
  • Wachowicz T., Brzostowski J., Roszkowska E. (2012), Reference Points-based Methods in Supporting the Evaluation of Negotiation Offers, Operations Research and Decisions, No. 4.
  • Zeuthen F. (1931), Problems of Monopoly and Economic Warfare, The American Economic Review, Vol. 21, No. 4, 701-704.
  • (www 1) Towarowa Giełda Energii S.A.: www.tge.pl.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

ISSN
2084-1531

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.cejsh-e3a53ea4-ab60-4c73-bc59-b5adcfd2ccad
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.