PL EN


2019 | 74 | 9 | 754 – 767
Article title

SUBJEKTÍVNY VKUS A ARGUMENTÁCIA

Authors
Content
Title variants
EN
Subjective taste and argumentation
Languages of publication
SK
Abstracts
EN
An argumentation is usually used to achieve a state in which one participant of a dialogue brings another participant to accept a belief the former presents. This idea is acceptable when it comes to disputes about (objective) facts. In the case of disputes about subjective tastes, however, the participants usually achieve a different kind of result; it often happens that they end their dialogue in a state in which they take their dispute to be resolved and, yet, retain their initial stand-points. If the disputes about tastes that end up in this state contain arguments, one may wonder what the proper use of argumentation in such disputes is. The present paper addresses this issue. The main idea consists in that the participants coordinate their positions by bringing their opponents to tolerate their respective subjective attitudes toward the items under discussion. This kind of response is framed by a contextualise semantics of predicates of personal taste.
Year
Volume
74
Issue
9
Pages
754 – 767
Physical description
Contributors
  • Katedra logiky a metodológie vied, Filozofická fakulta Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.cejsh-e662f8ac-cb35-4bcc-918c-90dc5b4a8a7a
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.