Access to the Supreme Court – Polish Approach

• Authors: Zembrzuski, Tadeusz

Abstracts

EN

The article presents the evolution of cassation complaint in Polish civil procedure. The author describes the nature of this appellate measure and the requirements of its admissibility. Aditionally, the text provides an insight into a preliminary procedure designed to select cassation complaints, which will be subsequently examined by the Supreme Court on the merits. The author depicts the evolution of Polish cassation into an extraordinary appellate measure and analyses how it has affected access to the Supreme Court. He argues that the preliminary acceptance procedure does not constitute a limitation of the admissibility of the cassation complaint. It is an additional, independent instrument regulating access to the Supreme Court. In his view, selection of admissible complaints with regard to preliminary acceptance is a better solution than developing limitations related to the admissibility of cassation complaints. The author concludes that requirements for cassation complaints are high and difficult to fulfil. The special character of cassation complaint, the relevance of the institution of preliminary selection, as well as other limitations, justify the thesis that Polish procedural law provides only a narrow access to the Supreme Court.

Keywords

EN

access to the Supreme Court; admissibility requirements; selection procedure; dostęp do Sądu Najwyższego; warunki dopuszczalności skargi kasacyjnej; przedsąd

• Publisher: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
• Journal: Studia Iuridica
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 81
• Pages: 233-244

Dates

published

2019-10-28

Contributors

author

Zembrzuski, Tadeusz

Identifiers

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0013.5473