Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2017 | 5(1) | 57-64

Article title

THE ESTIMATION OF NATURAL CAPITAL OF UKRAINE

Content

Title variants

PL
OCENA KAPITAŁU NATURALNEGO UKRAINY
RU
ОЦЕНКАПРИРОДНОГО КАПИТАЛА УКРАИНЫ

Languages of publication

EN PL RU

Abstracts

EN
The dynamics of the country's natural capital has been an indicator of the ecological status of a certain territory or an indicator of its quality. Natural goods should be given official accounting status in the national accounting system and an adequate statistical evaluation along with other indicators of economic potential. In the case of a decrease in the number of plant and animal species, one can unequivocally assert the deterioration of the ecological conditions of natural ecosystems, the development of the phenomen of biodiversity degradation. That is why economists often make an attempt to assess the ecological state of the territories through the phenomen of natural capital degradation.
PL
Dynamika kapitału naturalnego kraju ma wskaźnik stanu ekologicznego konkretnego terytorium lub wskaźnik jego jakości. Towary naturalne powinny być uzyskane z krajowego stanu oficjalnego jak i odpowiedniej oceny statystycznej, wraz z innymi wskaźnikami potencjału gospodarczego. W przypadku zmniejszenia się liczby gatunków roślin i zwierząt na pewno można powiedzieć o pogorszeniu się warunków ekologicznych naturalnych ekosystemów oraz rozwoju zjawisk degradacji różnorodności biologicznej. Dlatego ekonomiści powinni często podejmować próbę oceny stanu ekologicznego terytoriów przez badanie zjawiska degradacji kapitału przyrodniczego.
RU
Динамика природного капитала страны есть индикатором экологического состояния определенной территории или индикатором ее качества. Природные блага должны получить в национальном счетоводстве статус официального показателя и адекватную статистическую оценку наряду с другими показателями экономического потенциала. В случае уменьшения количества видов растений и животных можно однозначно утверждать об ухудшении экологических условий природных экосистем, развитие явлений деградации биоразнообразия. Именно поэтому экономисты чаще всего делают попытку оценки экологического состояния территорий через явление деградации природного капитала.

Contributors

References

  • 1. Burke, R. 1993. 2nd ed. Project Management: Planning and Control. New York: JohnWiley & Sons.
  • 2. Common, R., Flynn, N. & Mellon, E. 1992. Managing Public Services – Competitionand Decentralization. London: Butterworth.
  • 3. Denhardt, R. B. and J. V. Denhardt (2000). The New Public Service: Serving RatherThan Steering. Public Administration Review, vol. 60, No. 6, pp. 549–559.
  • 4. Denhardt, J. V. and R. B. Denhardt (2011). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering.3rd Edition. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
  • 5. Dunleavy, P. and C. Hood (1994). From Old Public Administration to New Public Management.Public Money & Management, vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 9-16.
  • 6. Fernandez, D.J. & Fernandez, J.D. (2008). Agile Project Management – Agilism versustraditional approaches. Journal of Computer Information System, 49(2), pp. 10-17.
  • 7. Hauc, A. & Kovac, J. 2000. Project management in strategy implementation: Experiencesin Slovenia. International Journal of Project Management. Vol. 18. No. 1. Febr. 2000.pp.61-67.
  • 8. Kerzner, Harold. 2005. Using the Project Management Maturity Model: Strategic Planningfor Project Management. USA: John Wiley&Sons, Inc.
  • 9. Kraft, T. A., & Steenkamp, A. L. (2012). A holistic approach for understanding projectmanagement. InF. Stowell (Ed.), Systems approach applications for developments in information technology(pp.25-29). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-1562-5.ch003.
  • 10. Maylor, H. 1996. Project Management. London: Pitman Publishing.
  • 11. Meredith, J.R. 1985. Project Management: A Managerial Approach. 2nd ed. New York:John Wiley & Sons.
  • 12. Stacey, R. 1993. Strategic Thinking and the Management of Change: International Perspectiveson Organizational Dynamics. London: Kogan Page.
  • 13. Osborne, S. P. (2006). The New Public Governance? Public Management Review, vol.8, No. 3,pp. 377-388. [online] Available at: spp.xmu.edu.cn/wp-content/uploads/.../the-New-PublicGovernance.pdf.[Accessed 16 Jun. 2016].
  • 14. Osborne, S. P. (2010). The New Public Governance. London: Routledge.
  • 15. Osborne, S. P., Z. Radnor and G. Nasi (2013). A New Theory for Public Service Management?Towards a (Public) Service-Dominant Approach. The American Review of PublicAdministration, vol. 43, No. 2,pp. 135-158.
  • 16. Paletz, S.B.F. (2012). Project management of innovative teams. In: Mumford, M.D.(Ed.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 421–455). Amsterdam: Elvesier. [online] Availableat: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374714-3.00017-3. [Accessed 16 Jun. 2016].
  • 17. Van der Waldt, G. 2001. Establishing a Management by Projects approach for servicedelivery. Journal for Public Administration and Management, 36(4). pp. 296-311.
  • 18. Yakimchuk A.Yu. Economics and organization of the natural reserve fund: monogr. / A. Yu. Yakimchuk. - Rivno: National University of Water Management and Nature Management, 2007. - 204 p.
  • 19. Bobylev S.N., Gusev A.A., Martynov A.S., Tishkov A.A. Economics for the protection of nature. National Forum on Conservation of Wildlife of Russia. M., 2001. - P. 41-49.
  • 20. Veklych O., Yahieva T. Consideration of natural capital as a basic component of economic development of Ukraine // Economy of Ukraine. - 2004. - No. 12. - P. 73-80.
  • 21. Medvedeva O.E. Methods of economic evaluation of biodiversity. Theory and practice of evaluation works. M .: Ecological and Educational Center "Zapoviedniki", 1999. - P. 34.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ceon.element-332d0afd-adff-3e15-bae5-738c56928f04
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.