Roszczenie o zapłatę wielokrotności stosownego wynagrodzenia w prawie autorskim – głos w obronie status quo na dzień przed wyrokiem Trybunału Konstytucyjnego

• Authors: Sokołowska, Dorota

Abstracts

PL

The article contains the response to the criticism of the solution regulated under article 79 section 1 point 3 letter b of the Copyright and Related Rights Act made before the Constitutional Tribunal rendered its judgment of 23 June 2015 repealing he above-mentioned legal provision. The genesis of article 79 section 1 point 3 letter b leads to the conclusion that it constituted an autonomous institution of the Polish copyright law. In particular, the claim for payment of a triple amount of the respective remuneration, where the copyright infringement is culpable, was not of a penal nature, neither was it contradictory to the Polish model of liability for damages, moreover at the same time, it was in accordance with the provisions of the Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights.

Keywords

PL

Directive 2004/48/EC; copyright; infringement; damages; respective remuneration; multiple amount; prawo autorskie; naruszenie; odszkodowanie; stosowne wynagrodzenie; wielokrotność

• Publisher: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
• Journal: Studia Iuridica
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 72
• Pages: 349-373

Dates

published

2018-04-16

Contributors

author

Sokołowska, Dorota

Identifiers

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0011.7630