Identity Processing Style and Defense Mechanisms

• Authors: Berzonsky Michael , Kinney Andrew
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

To investigate relationships between identity processing styles and patterns of defense mechanisms, 213 participants (Mean age = 23.01 years) completed measures of defense-mechanism clusters and styles of negotiating (or managing to avoid) identity conflicts and threats (64% of the participants were female). A self-exploratory, informational identity style was associated with defense mechanisms that control anxiety and threats via internal cognitive maneuvers. In contrast, a diffuse-avoidant identity style was found to be related to maladaptive defensive maneuvers including turning against others and turning aggression inward against oneself, which is related to depressive reactions. A foreclosing, normative identity style was associated with defenses that limit awareness of threatening ideas and information by denial, distortion, and negation. None of these relationships was qualified by age or gender. The findings are discussed in terms of a process model of identity development that emphasizes social-cognitive differences in how individuals construct, maintain, and reconstruct their self-identity.

Keywords

EN

ADOLESCENCE; DEFENSE MECHANISMS; IDENTITY; IDENTITY STYLE; SOCIAL-COGNITIVE

Discipline

• PSYCHOLOGY: PSYCHOLOGY

• Publisher: Committee for Psychological Sciences, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Polish Psychological Bulletin
• Year: 2008
• Volume: 39
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 111-117
• Physical description: source-id: PPB_39_3\V574TH47030X261U.xml
• Document type: ARTICLE

Contributors

author

Berzonsky Michael

author

Kinney Andrew

• Michael Berzonsky, Department of Psychology, SUNY Cortland, Cortland, NY 13045 USA

References

• Adams, G. R., Munro, B., Doherty-Poirer, M., Munro, G., Petersen, A-M. R., & Edwards, J. (2001). Diffuse/avoidance, normative, and informational identity styles: Using identity theory to predict maladjustment. Identity:An International Journal of Theory and Research, 1, 307-320.
• Berman, A. M., Schwartz, S. J., Kurtines, W. M., & Berman, S. L. (2001). The process of exploration in identity formation: The role of style and competence.Journal of Adolescence, 24, 513-528.
• Berzonsky, M. D. (1989). Identity style: Conceptualization and measurement.Journal of Adolescent Research, 4, 267-281.
• Berzonsky, M. D. (1990). Self-construction over the life-span: A process perspective on identity formation. In G. J. Neimeyer & R. A. Neimeyer (Eds.), Advances in personal construct theory (Vol. 1, pp. 155-186). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
• Berzonsky, M. D. (1992). Identity style and coping strategies.Journal of Personality, 60, 771-788.
• Berzonsky, M. D. (2002, July). Identity processing styles, Self-construction, and personal epistemic assumptions: A social-cognitive perspective. Paper presented at a Workshop on "Social Cognition in Adolescence: Its Developmental Significance," Groningen, The Netherlands.
• Berzonsky, M. D. (2003a, May). Identity processing styles, ego processes, and subjective well-being. Paper presented at the meetings of the Society for Research in Identity Formation. Vancouver, British Columbia.
• Berzonsky, M. D. (2003b). Identity style and well-being: Does commitment matter? Identity:An International Journal of Theory and Research, 3, 131-142.
• Berzonsky, M. D., & Adams, G. R. (1999). Reevaluating the identity status paradigm: Still useful after 35 years.Developmental Review, 19, 557-590.
• Berzonsky, M. D., & Ferrari, J. R. (1996). Identity orientation and decisional strategies.Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 597-606.
• Berzonsky, M. D., & Kuk, L. S. (2000). Identity status, identity processing style, and the transition to university.Journal of Adolescent Research, 15, 81-98.
• Berzonsky, M. D., & Kuk, L. S. (2005). Identity style, college adjustment, and academic performance.Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 235-247.
• Berzonsky, M. D., & Neimeyer, G. J. (1994). Ego identity status and identity processing orientation: The moderating role of commitment.Journal of Research in Personality, 28, 425-435.
• Berzonsky, M. D., & Sullivan, C. (1992). Social-cognitive aspects of identity style: Need for cognition, experiential openness, and introspection.Journal of Adolescent Research, 7, 140-155.
• Cramer, P. (1988). The Defense Mechanism Inventory: A review of research and discussion of the scales.Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 142-164.
• Cramer, P. (1995). Identity, narcissism and defense mechanisms in late adolescence.Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 341-361.
• Cramer, P. (1997). Identity, personality, and defense mechanisms: An observer-based study.Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 58-77.
• Cramer, P. (1998). Freshman to senior year: A follow-up study of Identity, narcissism and defense mechanisms.Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 156-172.
• Dollinger, S. M. (1995). Identity styles and the five-factor model of personality.Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 475-479.
• Duriez, B., Soenens, B., & Beyers, W. (2004). Personality, identity styles, and religiosity: An integrative study among late adolescents in Flanders (Belgium).Journal of Personality, 72, 877-910.
• Dusek, J. B., & Berzonsky, M. D. (1993, March). Identity styles and coping with stressful events. Poster presented at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, Louisiana.
• Gleser, G. E., & Ihilevich, D. (1969). An objective instrument for measuring defense mechanisms.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 51-60.
• Haan, N. (1977). Coping and defending: Processes of self-environment organization. New York: Academic.
• Ihilevich, D., & Gleser, G. C. (1986). Defense mechanisms. Owosso, MI: DMI Associates.
• Nurmi, J.-E., Berzonsky, M. D., Tammi, K., & Kinney, A. (1997). Identity processing orientation, cognitive and behavioral strategies and well being.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 21, 555-570.
• Schwartz, S. J., Mullis, R. L., Waterman, A. S., & Dunham, R. M. (2000). Ego identity status, identity style, and personal expressiveness: An empirical investigation of three convergent constructs.Journal of Adolescent Research, 15, 504-521.
• Soenens, B., Berzonsky, M. D., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., & Goossens, L. (2005). Identity styles and causality orientations: In search of the motivational underpinnings of the identity exploration process.European Journal of Personality, 19, 427-442.
• Soenens, B., Duriez, B., & Goossens, L. (2005). Social-psychological profiles of identity styles: Attitudinal and social-cognitive correlates in late adolescence.Journal of Adolescence, 28, 107-125.
• Streitmatter, J. (1993). Identity status and identity style: A replication study.Journal of Adolescence, 16, 211-215.
• Whitbourne, S. K., Sneed, J. R., & Skultety, K. M. (2002). Identity processes in adulthood: Theoretical and methodological challenges. Identity:An International Journal of Theory and Research, 2, 29-45.
• White, J. M., & Jones, R. M. (1996). Identity styles of male inmates.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 490-504.

Identifiers

CEJSH db identifier

09PLAAAA071016

DOI

10.2478/v10059-008-0022-7