EN
The author is trying to deal with such phenomena - it seems that Trziszka much more bluntly than other prose writers manifested his 'plebeianism'. He entered into disputes with real and imaginary opponents of the literary ways much more willingly, much more longer than other insisted on existing of separate formation about 'plebeian roots' and about mission which fell to such prose. Author wants to predict a question - is there something more behind this strongly manifested relationship of Trziszka with that literary group, more apart from situational similarities, what was it ? The essay assumes that was a feeling full of exceptionally intensive lack of the membership in any real social community. As author has noticed, at Trziszka's creativity this feeling of the lack didn't lead for discovering some stable or permanent forms of identifying with anything around or anybody. Therefore Trziszka became a writer, who didn't let to forget about this base on which he grown up and on which he stood as an alive certificate of the social and cultural chaos. Author marks - if we talk about the feeling full of lack of the membership, for sure Trziszka had not anybody who tried to deal with that in the entire history of 'peasant stream'. In fact, the result of this Trziszka's attitude constitutes a process of permanent move, he didn't stop a process of being in the move, in the eternal escape or eternal pursuit. Where was not a place for home or any place which could be possible called that way. His writing accompanied this constant boiling of the psyche who couldn't stabilize in other permanent form. Trziszka's writing had to become such form, it had to be a tool of taming and consideration of new personal experience called - mission towards to oneself.