2008 | 39 | 4 | 209-216
Article title

Sometimes it is not so bad to decide in a hurry: Influence of different levels of temporal opportunity on the elaboration of purchasing intention

Title variants
Languages of publication
The present study examines the impact of different levels of time pressure on the elaboration of purchase intention. Participants formed attitudes towards two stores and then indicate in which stores they would go shopping. Descriptions of the stores were experimentally constructed in order to indicate whether participants rely on an attribute-based or an attitude-based strategy when forming their purchase intention. Participants made their choices under time pressure (either 5, 9 or 15 seconds) or were given unlimited time to deliberate. Results show that in 5 second limit and unlimited time conditions, they rely more on an attitude-based decision strategy and chose the less optimal store. Under moderate time pressure (9 and 15 seconds), participants are able to use relevant knowledge about the stores and rely more on an attribute-based strategy. Results are discussed in light of the Unconscious Theory of Thought (Dijksterhuis & Nordgren, 2006).
Physical description
source-id: PPB_39_4\U1128469022P3667.xml
Document type
  • Jean-Chrstophe Giger, Instytut Psychologii PAN, ul. Chodakowska 19/31, 03-815 Poland
  • alas, R., Sweklej, J., Pochwatko, G., Godlewska, M. (2006).Affect, mood and implicit learning in intuition.Paper presented at 2nd Workshop on Cognitive and Social Perspectives on Unconsciousness, Kazimierz Dolny, Poland, 8th July 2006.
  • Ben Zur, H., & Breznitz, S. J. (1981). The effects of time pressure on risky choice behavior.Acta Psychologica, 47, 89-104.
  • Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.),Unintented thought(pp. 212-252). New York, Guildford Press.
  • Davidson, J. P. (1989). The five elements of our time-pressed society.Management Quartely, 30, 32-34.
  • Dijksterhuis, A. & Nordgren, L. F. (2006). A Theory of Unconscious Thought.Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 95-109.
  • Dijksterhuis, A. (2004). Think different: The Merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 586-598.
  • Edland, A., & Svenson, O. (1993). Judgement and decision making under time pressure: studies and findings. In O. Svenson & A. J. Maule (Eds.),Time pressure and stress in human judgement and decision making.New York/London: Plenum Press.
  • Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple process by which attitudes guide behavior: the MODE model as an integrative framework.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 74-97.
  • Fazio, R. H., & Towles-Schwein, T. (1999). The MODE model of attitude-behavior processes. In S. Chaiken et Y. Trope (Eds),Dual process theories in social psychology(pp. 97-116). New-York: Guilford.
  • Gross, S. R., Holtz, R., Miller, N. (1995). Attitude certainty. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.),Attitude strength(pp. 215-245). LEA.
  • Giger, J. C., & Pochwatko, G. (in prep.). Influence of transient affective states and time pressure on the elaboration of the purchase intention.
  • Klauer, K. C., & Stern, E. (1992). How attitudes guide memory-based judgments: A two-process model.Journal Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 186-206.
  • Ordóñez, L., & Lehman, B. (1997). Decisions under Time Pressure: How Time Constraint Affects Risky Decision Making.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71, 21-140.
  • Park, C. W., Iyer, E. S., & Smith, D. C. (1989). The Effects of situational factors on in-store grocery shopping behavior: The role of store environment and time available for shopping,.Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 422-433.
  • Payne, J., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. (1988). Adaptative strategy selection in decision making.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 534-552.
  • Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge.Journal of Experimental of Psychology, 118, 219-235.
  • Rieskamp, J., & Hoffrage, U. (1999). When people use simple heuristics and how can we tell? In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, & the ABC Research Group,Simple heuristics that make us smart(pp. 141-167). New-York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Sanbonmatsu, D. M., & Fazio, R. H. (1990). The role of attitudes in memory based decision making.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 614-622.
  • Suri, R. & Monroe, K. B. (2003). The effects of time constraints on consumers' judgments of price and products.Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 92-104.
  • Svenson, O., & Edland, A. (1987). Change of preferences under time pressure: Choice and judgment.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 28, 322-330.
  • Svenson, O., Edland, A., & Slovic, P. (1990). Choices and judgments of incompletely described decision alternatives under time pressure.Acta Psychologica, 75, 153-169.
  • Weenig, M. W. H., & Maarleveld, M. (2002). The impact of time constraint on information search strategies in complex choice tasks.Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 689-702.
  • Wilson, T. D., Dunn, D. S., Kraft, D., & Lisle, D. J. (1989). Introspection, attitude change, and attitude-behavior consistency: The disruptive effects of explaining why we feel the way we do. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  • Wrigth, P. (1974). The harassed decision maker: Time pressures, distractions, and the use of evidence.Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 555-561.
Document Type
Publication order reference
CEJSH db identifier
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.