Znaczenie odstraszania strategicznego dla bezpieczeństwa międzynarodowego

• Authors: Banasik Mirosław

Title variants

EN

Importance of strategic deterrence for international security

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

The aim of the article was to clarify the essence of the strategic deterrence and to characterize the deterrent mechanisms used to shape international security. The article explains the nature of the deterrent and mechanisms to guarantee international security. It presents the genesis of deterrence and characterizes its evolution. It also indicates the need for changes in the theory and practice of deterrence. As a result of the studies, it has been established that, nowadays, thanks to the complementary use of hard and soft power, strategic deterrence has a multi-faceted character and its importance for international relations is increasing. It is closely linked to diplomacy and constitutes a mechanism, by means of which the foreign political interests of states are realized and the international security order is shaped.

Keywords

EN

Deterrence; international security; strategy; conflict; punishment; threat

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego
• Journal: Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 1
• Pages: 153-164

Dates

published

2021-06-30

Contributors

author

Banasik Mirosław

• Uniwersytet Jana Kochanowskiego w Kielcach

References

• BEAUFRE, A. (1965), Deterrence and Strategy. New York. Google Scholar
• CORNISH, P. (2017), Integrated Deterrence: NATO’s ‘First Reset’ Strategy. In: https://www.globsec.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/GNAI-Integratted-Deterrrence.pdf> [dostęp 29.12.2018]. Google Scholar
• DANILOVIC, V. (2017), When the Stakes Are High. Deterrence and Conflict among Major Powers, University of Michigan. In: https://www.press.umich.edu/pdf/0472112872-ch3.pdf [dostęp 25.12.2018]. Google Scholar
• EASSEY, J. M./BOMAN, J. H. (2015), Deterrence Theory. In: https://marisluste.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/deterrence-theory.pdf [dostęp 05.01.2019]. Google Scholar
• HOFFMAN, F. (2016), The Contemporary Spectrum of Conflict: Protracted, Gray Zone, Ambiguous, and Hybrid Modes of War. In: https:// s3.amazonaws.com/ims-2016/PDF/2016_Index_of_US_ Military_ Strength_ESSAY S_HOF FMAN.pdf [dostęp 16.02.2016]. Google Scholar
• HUTH, P./RUSSETT, B. (1988), Deterrence Failure and Crisis Escalation. In: International Studies Quarterly. 32 (1). In: https://academic.oup.com/isq/article-abstract/32/1/29/1813705?redirectedFrom=fulltext [dostęp 28.12.2018]. Google Scholar
• HUTH, P. K. (1988), Extended Deterrence and the Prevention of War. New Haven. Google Scholar
• Internetowy słownik (2018), Internetowy słownik języka angielskiego. In: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/deter [dostęp 25.12.2018]. Google Scholar
• Internetowy słownik (2019), Internetowy słownik języka polskiego. W: https://sjp.pwn.pl/slowniki/odstraszanie.html [dostęp 16.01.2019]. Google Scholar
• JERVIS, R. (1979), Deterrence Theory Revisite. In: World Politics. 31 (2) URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259380734_Deterrence_Theory_Revisited [dostęp 29.12.2018]. Google Scholar
• KAPUSTA, P. (2015), The Gray Zone. In: Special Warfare. 28 (4). URL: http://www.soc.mil/swcs/SWmag/archive/SW2804/October%202015%20Special%20Warfare.pdf [do-stęp 16.02.2016]. Google Scholar
• KNOPF, J. (2008), Three Items in One: Deterrence as Concept, Research Program and Political Issue. In: https://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/10945/58532/isa08_proceeding_251419.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [dostęp 29.12.2018]. Google Scholar
• KNOPF, J. W. (2010), The Fourth Wave in Deterrence Research. In: Contemporary Security Policy. 31(1). URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13523261003640819?needAccess=true [dostęp 29.12.2018]. Google Scholar
• KÜHN, U. (2018), Preventing Escalation in the Baltics, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Washing-ton. Google Scholar
• MAZARR, M. J. (2018), Understanding Deterrence. Santa Monika. Google Scholar
• MAZARR, M. J./ARTHUR, C. (2018), What Deters and Why. Exploring Requirements for Effective Deterrence of Interstate Aggression. Santa Monica. Google Scholar
• MORGAN, P. M. (2012), The State of Deterrence in International Politics Today. In: Contemporary Security Policy. 33 (1). URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13523260.2012.659589 [dostęp 29.12.2018]. Google Scholar
• PRIOR, T. (2018), Resilience: The Fifth Wave in the Evolution of Deterrence. In: http://www.css.ethz.ch/en/services/digital-library/articles/article.html/41604a30-ae23-44c6-94d4-8cf05e316a6c/pdf [dostęp 29.12.2018 ]. Google Scholar
• Przegląd (2018), Przegląd NATO. In: https://www.nato.int/docu/review/2016/also-in-2016/nato-deterrence-defence-alliance/PL/index.htm [dostęp 28.12.2018]. Google Scholar
• RAI, S. B. (2017), Fourth Wave of Deterrence: Revisiting Application in the. Age of Nuclear Terrorism. New Delhi. Google Scholar
• ROBERTS, P./HARDIE, A. (2015), The Validity of Deterrence in the Twenty-First Century. In: https://rusi.org/sites/default/files/201508_op_the_validity_of_deterrence.pdf [dostęp 29.08.2019]. Google Scholar
• RÜHLE, M. (2015), Deterrence: what it can (and cannot) do. In: NATO Review. URL: https://www.nato.int/docu/review/2015/Also-in-2015/deterrence-russia-military/EN/index.htm [dostęp 14.03.2018]. Google Scholar
• Russia Military Power (2017), Russia Military Power. Building a Military to Support Great Power Aspirations. Defense Intelligence Agency. Washington. Google Scholar

Identifiers

ISSN

2081-1128