PL EN


Journal
2013 | 14 | 81-98
Article title

When Politics and Law Collide: Ranking American Presidents from the Perspective of Their Policy towards the United States Supreme Court

Authors
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Most scholars conducting research on the U.S. presidency analyze a particular presidency, ranking the ideology and political role of the chief executive, his rhetoric, interior policy program, foreign policy activity, and impact on the economy, as well as the role of the president as national commander of the armed forces. My main field of research is not the presidency, but the American judiciary. However, careful analysis of the theoretical and practical aspects of the functioning of American courts, and especially the U.S. Supreme Court, reveals the enormous impact of presidents on justice. Presidents nominate judges (and Supreme Court Justices), they may determine the scope of legal briefs presented in cases where the government is the party, and they can influence governmental participation as amicus curiae before the Court, which has become a vital tool of the United States in recent years. The growing political role of the Supreme Court, its enormous activity in applying judicial review, and its high position within the U.S. governmental structure have not only caused changes to the checks‑and‑balances system, but, above all, have resulted in the increased political activity of various presidents towards the tribunal. As a result, many chief executives consider their ‘judicial policy’ as one of the most important elements of their legacy. From this perspective, we may rank presidents who had the greatest (or the least) impact on the membership and operation of the Court (i.e. Washington, F.D.R., Lincoln versus Taylor, Harrison, Carter), as well as presidents who were willing to impose revolutionary changes in American constitutional law and succeeded (F.D.R., J.F.K.) or failed (Reagan). Analysis of the amicus curiae participation of the U.S. Solicitor General before the Supreme Court can also rank presidents as more or less active in their judicial politics. The aim of this paper is to show certain ranks of presidents with regard to their policy towards the Supreme Court, and also to present the ideological model which governed the majority of presidents in their politics towards the judiciary throughout U.S. history, leading to an ongoing clash of law and politics.
Keywords
Journal
Year
Issue
14
Pages
81-98
Physical description
Contributors
References
  • Abraham, Henry J. The Judicial Process: An Introductory Analysis of the Courts of the United States, England and France. New York: Oxford University Press, 1980.
  • Abraham, Henry J. Justices, Presidents, and Senators, Revised: A History of the U.S. Supreme Court Appointments from George Washington to Bush II. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2007.
  • An Act to Establish the Judicial Courts of the United States. 1 Stat. 73, 1789.
  • An Act to Amend the Judicial System of the United States, and to Change Certain Judicial Circuits. 14 Stat. 209, 1866.
  • Alcoff, Linda Martin. “Sotomayor’s Reasoning.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy, vol. 48, issue 1, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2041‑6962.2010.01005.x.
  • Bickel, Alexander M. The Least Dangerous Branch: the Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Indianapolis: Bobbs‑Merril, 1962.
  • Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. Federal Judicial Center. Web. 15 Dec. 2012. http://www.fjc.gov/public/home.nsf/hisj.
  • Carney, Thomas E. “The Political Judge: Justice John McLean’s Pursuit of the Presidency.” Ohio History, vol. 111, 2002: 121‑144.
  • Dahl, Robert. “Decision‑Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as the National Policy Maker.” Journal of Public Law, vol. 6, 1957.
  • Funston, Richard. A Vital National Seminar: The Supreme Court in National Political Life. Palo Alto: Mayfield Publishing, 1978.
  • Garlicki, Leszek. “Sędziowie Sądu Najwyższego Stanów Zjednoczonych”, [in:] Sokolewicz, Wojciech (ed.). Instytucje i doktryny prawno‑‑ polityczne Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki. Warszawa: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, 1974.
  • George H. W. Bush Press Conference. Kennebunkport, Maine, 1 July 1991. Web. 15 Dec. 2012. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=29651#axzz1H8bM82Ii.
  • Goldinger, Carolyn. The Supreme Court at Work. Washington D.C.: CQ Press, 1990.
  • Heller, Francis H. (ed.). The Truman White House: The Administration of the Presidency, 1945‑1953. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1980.
  • Hodder‑Williams, Richard. The Politics of the United States Supreme Court. London: Allen and Unwin, 1980.
  • Kalman, Laura. Abe Fortas: A Biography. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990.
  • Laidler, Paweł. “Friends of the Court or Friends of Their Own Interests: Amicus Curiae as a Lobbying Tool of Groups of Interest in the U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision‑Making Process.” Ad Americam, vol. 11, 2010: 63‑78.
  • Laidler, Paweł. Sąd Najwyższy Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki: od prawa do polityki. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2011.
  • Leuchtenburg, Wiliam. The Supreme Court Reborn: The Constitutional Revolution in the Age of Roosevelt. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
  • Leuchtenburg, William E. Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal: 1932‑‑ 1940. New York: Harper Perennial, 2009.
  • MacKeever, Robert J. The U.S. Supreme Court: A Political and Legal Analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997.
  • McHargue, Daniel S. “President Taft’s Appointments to the Supreme Court.” The Journal of Politics, vol. 12, 1950. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2126298.
  • Milligan, Susan. “Personal Ties Bind Obama and Kagan. President Joins Ranks of Picking Friend for Court.” The Boston Globe 16 May 2010. Web. 15 Dec. 2012. http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/05/16/personal_ties_bind_obama_kagan/.
  • Newmyer, R. Kent. The Supreme Court Under Marshall and Taney. New York: Harlan Davidson Inc., 2006.
  • Nowak, John E., Rotunda, Ronald D. Constitutional Law. St. Paul: West Group, Minnesota, 2000.
  • Reagan, Ronald. “Remarks Announcing the Intention to Nominate Sandra Day O’Connor to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.” Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States 7 July 1981, Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1981.
  • “Reagan Aims Fire at Liberal Judges.” New York Times 9 October 1986: A32.
  • Remini, Robert V. The Life of Andrew Jackson. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 1984.
  • Rosen, Jeffrey. The Supreme Court. The Personalities and Rivalries that Defined America. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2007.
  • Schaetzel, Wendy, Pertschuk, Michael. The People Rising: The Campaign Against the Bork Nomination. New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press, 1989.
  • Schwartz, Herman. Packing the Courts: The Conservative Campaign to Rewrite the Constitution. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1988.
  • Scigliano, Robert. The Supreme Court and the Presidency. New York: Free Press, 1971.
  • Simon, Paul. Advice and Consent: Clarence Thomas, Robert Bork and the Intriguing History of the Supreme Court Nomination Battles. Washington D.C.: National Press Books, 1992.
  • Tribe, Laurence. God Save This Honorable Court: How Choice of the Supreme Court Justices Shapes Our History. New York: Random House, 1985.
  • Urofsky, Melvin I. The Supreme Court Justices. A Biographical Dictionary. New York: Garland Publishing Inc., 1994.
  • Watson, George, Stookey, John. Shaping America: The Politics of Supreme Court Appointments. New York: Harper Collins College Publications, 1995.
  • Whittington, Keith E., “The Burger Court (1969‑1986): Once More in Transition,” [in:] Tomlins, Christopher (ed.). The United States Supreme Court: The Pursuit of Justice. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2005.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-01c55e57-6c27-46b3-b030-0a1b1ff92a9b
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.