PL EN


2020 | 4 (102) | 20-32
Article title

Ocena potencjału działań Programu Rozwoju Obszarów Wiejskich w ograniczeniu emisji gazów cieplarnianych w rolnictwie polskim

Authors
Content
Title variants
EN
Evaluation of the potential of Rural Development Programme measures for greenhouse gas emission reduction in polish agriculture
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
PL
Ocena efektywności i skuteczności działań klimatycznych oraz rolno-środowiskowo-klimatycznych zaprogramowanych w polityce rozwoju obszarów wiejskich wymaga dostępu do wiarygodnych danych na temat wpływu stosowania różnych praktyk rolnych na redukcję emisji gazów cieplarnianych. W pracy podjęto próbę scharakteryzowania potencjału redukcyjnego działań wspieranych przez instrumenty Programu Rozwoju Obszarów Wiejskich (PROW). Z przedstawionego przeglądu wskaźników literaturowych wynika, że priorytetem powinno być wsparcie zakładania lasów oraz ekstensywnych form produkcji rolnej na trwałych użytkach zielonych oraz naturalnych siedliskach, pełniących funkcję pochłaniacza dwutlenku węgla, przy jednoczesnym ograniczeniu wsparcia intensywnego chowu zwierząt. Drugim obszarem priorytetowym są działania w zakresie poprawy efektywności i ograniczenia emisji wysokonakładowych technologii rolniczych: uprawa konserwująca, racjonalizacja nawożenia mineralnego, technologie przetwarzania nawozów naturalnych, odnawialne źródła energii oraz optymalizacja systemów żywienia i utrzymania zwierząt.
EN
In order to evaluate efficiency and effectiveness of climate measure and agri-environment-climate measures for Common Agricultural Policy programming, one needs to have access to reliable data on the effects of agricultural practices use on greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction. In the paper, the attempt was made to describe GHG abatement potential for Rural Development Programme measures. The literature review shows, that the priority must be afforestation of agricultural land and extensive management of grasslands that contribute significantly to soil carbon accumulation. Intensive animal farming is to be limited at the same time. Further actions should focus on improving efficiency and reducing GHG emission of intensive agricultural technologies, that is to say conservation agriculture, optimizing organic and mineral fertilization, technologies for processing of organic fertilizers, renewable energy sources and optimizing feeding and management strategies for livestock.
Year
Issue
Pages
20-32
Physical description
Dates
received
2020-10-15
accepted
2020-12-14
Contributors
author
  • Instytut Uprawy, Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
References
  • Álvaro-Fuentes J., Plaza-Bonilla D., Arrúe J. L., Lampurlanés J., Cantero-Martínez C. (2014): Soil organic carbon storage in a no-tillage chronosequence under Mediterranean conditions. Plant and Soil, 376(1-2), s. 31-41. doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1167-x.
  • Alliance Environnement (2018): Evaluation study of the impact of the CAP on climate change and greenhouse gas emissions. Final Report. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/29eee93e-9ed0-11e9-9d01-01aa75ed71a1 – dostęp: 15.09.2020.
  • Artz R. R. E., Chapman S. J., Donnelly D., Matthews R. (2012): Potential abatement from peatland restoration. Policy Briefing to the Scottish Government. Centre of Expertise on Climate Change, 8. https://www.climatexchange.org.uk – dostęp: 15.09.2020.
  • Aubert C. (2010): Stocker du carbone dans le sol, un enjeu majeur [w]: ÉcoRev Dossier “L’agriculture au coeur du projet écologiste”. Numer 35, s. 14-18. http://ecorev.org/spip.php?article920 – dostęp: 15.09.2020.
  • Bain C., Bonn A., Stoneman R., Chapman S., Coupar A., Evans M., Geary B., Howat M., Joosten H., Keenleyside C., Lindsay R., Labadz J., Littlewood N., Lunt P., Miller C., Moxey A., Orr H., Reed M. S., Smith P., Swales V., Thompson D. B. A., Van de Noort R., Wilson J. D., Worrall F. (2011): Commission of Inquiry on UK Peatlands. IUCN UK Peatland Programme, Edinburgh. https://www.iucn-uk-peatlandprogramme.org – dostęp: 15.09.2020.
  • Bhogal A., Nicholson F. A., Rollett A., Chambers B. J. (2009): Best Practice for Managing Soil Organic Matter in Agriculture. Manual of Methods for ‘Lowland’ Agriculture, Prepared as part of Defra project SP08016. http://randd.defra.gov.uk – dostęp: 15.09.2020.
  • Bol R., Blackwell M., Emmett B., Reynolds B., Hall J., Bhogal A., Ritz K. (2012): Assessment of the response of organo-mineral soils to change in management practices, Final report to Defra Sub-Project B of Defra Project SP1106: Soil carbon studies to explore greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation. http://sciencesearch.defra.gov.uk – dostęp: 15.09.2020.
  • Buckingham S., Cloy J., Topp K., Rees R., Webb J. (2013): Capturing cropland and grassland management impacts on soil carbon in the UK Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) inventory. Report for DEFRA Project SP1113. http://randd.defra.gov.uk – dostęp: 15.09.2020.
  • Chenu C., Klumpp K., Bispo A., Angers D., Colnenne C., Metay A. (2014): Stocker du carbone dans les sols agricoles: évaluation de leviers d’action pour la France, Innovations Agronomiques, 37, s. 23-37. http://www.territoires-climat.ademe.fr – dostęp: 15.09.2020.
  • Defra Project ECO103. Energy Marginal Abatement Cost Curve for Agriculture Sector. EVID4 - Final project report. http://sciencesearch.defra.gov.uk – dostęp: 15.09.2020.
  • Dupraz P., Guyomard H. (2019): Environment and climate in the Common Agricultural Policy. EuroChoices, 18(1), s. 18-25. doi: 10.1111/1746-692X.12219.
  • Eory V., MacLeod M., Topp C. F. E., Rees R. M., Webb J., McVittie A., Wall E., Borthwick F., Watson C., Waterhouse A., Wiltshire J., Bell H., Moran D., Dewhurst R. (2015): Review and update the UK Agriculture Marginal Abatement Cost Curve to assess the greenhouse gas abatement potential for the 5th carbon budget period and to 2050. Final Report. https://www.theccc.org.uk – dostęp: 15.09.2020.
  • ETO (Europejski Trybunał Obrachunkowy) (2017): Programowanie w zakresie rozwoju obszarów wiejskich – należy dążyć do uproszczenia i bardziej koncentrować się na rezultatach. Sprawozdanie specjalne. Luksemburg. https://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/SR17_16/SR_RURAL_DEV_PL.pdf – dostęp: 15.09.2020.
  • Fangueiro D., Hjorth M., Gioelli F. (2015): Acidification of animal slurry − a review. Journal of Environmental Management 149, s. 46-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman. 2014.10.001.
  • Frelih-Larsen A. Bowyer C. Albrecht S. Keenleyside C., Kemper M., Nanni S., Naumann S., Mottershead D., Landgrebe R., Andersen E., Banfi P., Bell S., Brémere I., Cools J., Herbert S., Iles A., Kampa E., Kettunen M., Lukacova Z., Moreira G., Kiresiewa Z., Rouillard J., Okx J., Pantzar M., Paquel K., Pederson R., Peepson A., Pelsy F., Petrovic D., Psaila E., Šarapatka B., Sobocka J., Stan A. C., Tarpey J., Vidaurre R. (2016): Updated inventory and assessment of soil protection policy instruments in EU Member States. Final Report to DG Environment, Ecologic Institute, Berlin.https://ec.europa.eu/environment/soil/pdf/Soil_inventory_report.pdf – dostęp: 15.09.2020.
  • Hallett P., Balana B., Towers W., Moxey A., Chamen T. (2012): Cost curve for mitigation of soil compaction, Final report to Defra Sub-Project A of Defra Project SP1305: Studies to inform policy development with regard to soil degradation. http://randd.defra.gov.uk – dostęp: 15.09.2020.
  • Heil G. W., Muys B., Hansen K. (red.) (2007): Environmental Effects of Afforestation in NorthWestern Europe: From Field Observations to Decision Support. Plant and Vegetation Springer, Dordrecht. – dostęp: springer.com. 01.08.2020.
  • Herzog A., Winckler C., Zollitsch W. (2018): In pursuit of sustainability in dairy farming: A review of interdependent effects of animal welfare improvement and environmental impact mitigation. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 267, 15, s.174-187. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2018.07.029.
  • Hoben J. P., Gehl R. J., Millar N., Grace P. R., Robertson G. P. (2011): Nonlinear nitrous oxide (N2O) response to nitrogen fertilizer in on-farm corn crops of the US Midwest. Global Change Biology 17(2), s. 1140-1152. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02349.x.
  • Kay S., Rega C., Moreno G., den Herder M., Palma J. H. N., Borek R. i in. (2019): Agroforestry creates carbon sinks whilst enhancing the environment in agricultural landscape in Europe. Land Use Policy, 83, s. 581-593. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.025.
  • Lam S. K., Suter H., Mosier A. R., Chen D. (2017): Using nitrification inhibitors to mitigate agricultural N2O emission: a double‐edged sword?. Global Change Biology, 23(2), s. 485-489. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13338
  • Llonch P., Haskell M. J., Dewhurst R. J., Turner S. P. (2017): Current available strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in livestock systems: an animal welfare perspective. Animal, 11(2), s. 274-284. doi: 10.1017/S1751731116001440.
  • MacLeod M. i in. (2015): Cost-Effectiveness of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures for Agriculture: A Literature Review, OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 89, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jrvvkq900vj-en – dostęp:15.09.2020.
  • Martineau H., Wiltshire J., Webb J., Hart K., Keenleyside C., Baldock D., Bell H. and Watterson J. (2016): Effective performance of tools for climate action policy - meta-review of Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) mainstreaming. Report for European Commission DG CLIMATE ACTION under specific contract number340202/2014/688088/SER/CLIMA.A.2 implementing Framework Contract CLIMA-.A.4/FRA/2011/0027, Ricardo-AEA & IEEP, Didcot, UK https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/forests/lulucf/docs/cap_mainstreaming_en.pdf - dostęp: 15.09.2020.
  • Misselbrook T. H., Cardenas L. M., Camp V., Thorman R. E., Williams J. R., Rollett A. J., Chambers B. J. (2014): An assessment of nitrification inhibitors to reduce nitrous oxide emissions from UK agriculture. Environmental Research Letters, 9(11), 115006. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/11/115006.
  • Moran D., MacLeod M., Wall E., Eory V., Pajot G., Matthews R., McVittie A., Barnes A., Rees R., Moxey A., Williams A., Smith P. (2008): UK marginal abatement cost curves for the agriculture and land use, land-use change and forestry sectors out to 2022, with qualitative analysis of options to 2050, Report No RMP4950, Committee on Climate Change, SAC. http:// https://www.theccc.org.uk – dostęp: 15.09.2020.
  • Müller B., Johnson L., Kreuer D. (2017): Maladaptive outcomes of climate insurance in agriculture. Global Environmental Change, 46, s. 23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha. 2017.06.010.
  • Newell Price J. P., Harris D., Chadwick D. R., Misselbrook T. H., Taylor M., Williams J. R., Anthony S. G., Duethmann D., Gooday R. D., Lord E. I., Chambers B. J. (2011): Mitigation Methods – User Guide. An Inventory of Mitigation Methods and Guide to their Effects on Diffuse Water Pollution, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Ammonia Emissions from Agriculture. Prepared as part of Defra project WQ0106. Ss. 158. http://randd.defra.gov.uk – dostęp: 15.09.2020.
  • Nix J. (2013): Farm management pocketbook (43rd Edition). Melton Mowbray, UK: Agro Business Consultants Ltd.
  • Novak S. M., Fiorelli J. L. (2010): Greenhouse gases and ammonia emissions from organic mixed crop-dairy systems: a critical review of mitigation options. Agron. Sustain. Dev., 30, s. 215-236. doi: 10.1051/agro/2009031.
  • Pe’er G., Zinngrebe Y., Hauck J., Schindler S., Dittrich A., Zingg S., Tscharntke T., Oppermann R., Sutcliffe L. M. E., Sirami C., Schmidt J., Hoyer C., Schleyer C., Lakner S. (2017): Adding some green to the greening: Improving the EU’s Ecological Focus Areas for biodiversity and farmers. Conservation Letters, 10(5), s. 517-530. doi: 10.1111/conl.12333.
  • Pe’er G., Bonn A., Bruelheide H., Dieker P., Eisenhauer N., Feindt P. H., Hagerdorn G., Hansjurgens B., Herzon I., Lomba A., Marquard E., Moreira F., Nitsch H., Oppermann R., Perino A., Rider N., Schleye'r C., Schindler S., Wolf C., Zinngrebe Y., Lakner S. (2020): Action needed for the EU Common Agricultural Policy to address sustainability challenges. People and Nature 2, s. 305–316. doi: 10.1002/pan3.10080.
  • Pérez Domínguez I., Fellmann T., Weiss F., Witzke P., Barreiro-Hurlé J., Himics M., Jansson T., Salputra G., Leip A. (2016): An economic assessment of GHG mitigation policy options for EU agriculture (EcAMPA 2). JRC Science for Policy Report, EUR 27973 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC93434/LFNA27097ENE.epub – dostęp: 15.09.2020.
  • Posthumus H., Deeks L. K., Rickson R. J., Quinton J. N. (2015): Costs and benefits of erosion control measures in the UK. Soil Use and Management, 31, s. 16-33. doi: 10.1111/sum.12057.
  • Rosenqvist L., Hansen K., Vesterdal L., van der Salm C. (2010): Water balance in afforestation chronosequences of common oak and Norway spruce on former arable land in Denmark and southern Sweden. Agricultural and forest Meteorology, 150 (2), s. 196-207, doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.10.004.
  • Ruser R., Schulz R. (2015): The effect of nitrification inhibitors on the nitrous oxide (N2O) release from agricultural soils–a review. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 178, s. 171–188. doi: 10.1002/jpln.201400251.
  • Scown M. W., Brady M. V., Nicholas K. A. (2020): Billions in misspent EU agricultural subsidies could support the Sustainable Development Goals. One Earth, 3(2), s. 237- 250. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.07.011.
  • SFC (2010): Climate change and forestry. Report to the Standing Forestry Committee. Standing Forestry Committee, Brussels.
  • Smith P. i in. (2008): Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. 2008. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 363, s. 789–813. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2184.
  • Wiltshire J., Martineau H., Webb J., Shamier N., Bell H., Rees B. (2014): Assessment of the Effectiveness, Impact and Cost of Measures to Protect Soils, Defra project SP1313. http://sciencesearch.defra.gov.uk – dostęp: 15.09.2020.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-036e3750-d21a-446f-87b1-5a8d74b49b92
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.