Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl


2015 | 18 | 51-81

Article title

Arrian’s preface to the anabasis Alexandrou and Plutarch’s prologue to the life of Alexander


Title variants

Languages of publication



It is usually maintained that the main object of Arrian’s criticism in his Anabasis are the historians of Alexander the Great. In the following I would like to argue that one of the writers Arrian criticized was also Plutarch of Chaeronea who wrote an influential biography of the Macedonian king. Although Arrian never referred directly to Plutarch’s Life of Alexander, he read not only many historical works on the king but used and criticized other accounts, called by him ta legomena (‘tales’). To this latter group Plutarch’s vita Alexandri should be included as well.







Physical description


  • Uniwersytet Gdański


  • Anderson G., 1990, ‘Arrian’s Anabasis Alexandri and Lucian’s Historia’, Historia 29, pp. 119-124.
  • Anderson G., 1993, The Second Sophistic: A cultural phenomenon in the Roman Empire, London–New York.
  • Asirvatham S., 2013, ‘Alexander the Philosopher in the Greco-Roman, Persian and Arabic traditions’, [in:] R. Stoneman, K. Erickson, I. Setton (eds.), The Alexander romance in Persia and the East, Groningen, pp. 311-326 (Ancient Narrative Supplementum 15).
  • Atkinson J. E., 1998, Q. Curzio Rufo, Storie di Alessandro Magno, trad. A. Antelani, Rome.
  • Atkinson J. E., 2013, ‘Introduction’, [in:] Arrian, Alexander the Great: The
  • Anabasis and Indica, trans. M. Hammond, Oxford, pp. xi-xlv.
  • Avenarius G., 1956, Lukians Schrift zur Geschichtsschreibung, Meisenheim am Glan.
  • Babut D., 1969, Plutarque et le stoicïsme, Paris.
  • Badian E., 1958, ‘Alexander the Great and te unity of mankind’, Historia 7, pp. 425-444.
  • Badian E., 1968, ‘A King’s Notebooks’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 72, pp. 183-204.
  • Badian E., 1976, ‘Some Recent Interpretations of Alexander’, [in:] E. Badian (ed.), Alexandre le Grand: Image et réalité, Geneva, pp. 279-303 (Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 22).
  • Badian E., 1985, ‘Alexander in Iran’, [in:] I. Gershevitch (ed.), The Cambridge history of Iran, vol. II, Cambridge, pp. 420-501.
  • Badian E., 1987, ‘The ring and the book’, [in:] W. Will (Hrsg.) Zu Alexander dem Grossen. Festschrift Gerhard Wirth zum 60. Geburtstag, Bd. II, Amsterdam, pp. 605-625.
  • Badian E., 2003a, ‘Plutarch’s unconfessed skill: The biographer as a critical historian’, [in:] T. Hantos (Hrsg.), Laurea internationalis. Festschrift für Jochen Bleicken zum 75. Geburtstag, Stuttgart, pp. 26-44.
  • Badian E., 2003b, ‘Arrianus [2] of Nicomedia’, [in:] H. Cancik, H. Schneider (eds.), Brill’s New Pauly, vol. I, Leiden–Boston, pp. 26-27.
  • Baynham 1998, Alexander the Great: The unique history of Curtius Rufus, Ann Arbor.
  • Baynham E. J., 2003, ‘The ancient evidence for Alexander the Great’, [in:] J. Roisman (ed.), Brill’s companion to Alexander the Great, Leiden–Boston, pp. 3-29.
  • Baynham E., 2009, ‘Barbarians I: Quintus Curtius and other Roman historians’ reception of Alexander’, [in:] A. Feldherr (ed.), The Cambridge companion to the Roman historians, Cambridge, pp. 288-300.
  • Baynham E. J., 2010, ‘Appendix A: Arrian’s sources and reliability’, [in:] J. Romm (ed.), The landmark Arrian: The campaigns of Alexander. Anabasis Alexandrou, trans. P. Mensch, New York, pp. 325-332. S. Bianchetti, 2005, ‘La concezione dell’ecumene di Alessandro in Diodoro XVII-XVIII’, [in:] C. Bearzot, F. Landucci (a cura di), Diodoro e l’altra
  • Grecia. Macedonia, Occidente, Ellenismo nella Biblioteca storica, Milano, pp. 127-154.
  • Billows R., 2000, ‘Polybius and Alexander Historiography’, [in:] A. B. Bosworth, E. J. Baynham (eds.), Alexander the Great in fact and fiction, Oxford, pp. 286-306.
  • Bosworth A. B., 1976a, ‘Errors in Arrian’, Classical Quarterly 26, pp. 117-139.
  • Bosworth A. B., 1976b, ‘Arrian and the Alexander Vulgate’, [in:] E. Badian (éd.), Alexandre le Grand: Image et réalité, Geneva, pp. 1-33 (Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 22).
  • Bosworth A. B., 1980, A historical commentary on Arrian’s history of Alexander, vol. I, Oxford.
  • Bosworth A. B., 1986, ‘Alexander the Great and the decline of Macedon’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 106, pp. 1-12.
  • Bosworth A. B., 1988a, From Arrian to Alexander: Studies in historical interpretations, Oxford.
  • Bosworth A. B., 1988b, Conquest and Empire: The reign of Alexander the Great, Cambridge.
  • Bosworth A. B., 1995, A historical commentary on Arrian’s history of Alexander, vol. II, Oxford.
  • Bosworth A. B., 1996, Alexander and the East: The tragedy of triumph, Oxford.
  • Bosworth A. B., 2006, ‘Alexander the Great and the creation of the Hellenistic age’, [in:] G. R. Bugh (ed.), The Cambridge companion to the Hellenistic world, Cambridge, pp. 9-27.
  • Bosworth A. B., 2007, ‘Arrian, Alexander, and the pursuit of glory’, [in:] J. Marincola (ed.), A companion to Greek and Roman historiography, vol. II, Malden–Oxford, pp. 447-453.
  • Bosworth A. B., 2010, ‘Alexander’s death: The poisoning rumors’, [in:] J. Romm, (ed.), The landmark Arrian: The campaigns of Alexander. Anabasis Alexandrou, trans. P. Mensch, New York, pp. 407-410.
  • Bosworth A. B., 2012, ‘Curtius Rufus, Quintus’, [in:] S. Hornblower, A. Spawforth, E. Eidinow (eds.), The Oxford classical dictionary. Fourth edition, Oxford, p. 400.
  • Boulet B., 2013, ‘The philosopher-king’, [in:] M. Beck (ed.), A companion to Plutarch, Malden–Oxford, pp. 449-462.
  • Bowden H., 2014, ‘Recent travels in Alexanderland’ [review article], Journal of Hellenic Studies 134, pp. 136-148.
  • Bowersock G. W., 1969, Greek sophists in the Roman Empire, Oxford.
  • Briant P., 2010, Alexander the Great and his empire: A short introduction, Princeton–Oxford.
  • Briant P., 2015, Darius in the shadow of Alexander, New Haven–London.
  • Brunt P. A., 1976, Arrian I. Anabasis Alexandri. Books I-IV, Cambridge–London.
  • Brunt P. A., 1977, ‘From Epictetus to Arrian’, Athenaeum 55, pp. 19-48 (=
  • Brunt P. A., 2013, Studies in Stoicism, Oxford, pp. 331-359).
  • Brunt P. A., 1983, Arrian II. Anabasis Alexandri. Books V-VII. Indica, Cambridge–London.
  • Burliga B., 2012, ‘Do the kings lie? Royal authority and historian’s objectivity in Arrian’s Anabasis’, Classica Cracoviensia 15, pp. 5-59.
  • Burliga B., 2013, Arrian’s Anabasis: An intellectual and cultural story, Gdańsk.
  • Burridge R. A., 2001, ‘Biography’, [in:] S. E. Potter (ed.), Handbook of classical rhetoric in the Hellenistic period 330 B.C. – A.D. 400, Leiden–Boston, pp. 371-392.
  • Buszard B., 2010, ‘A Plutarchan parallel to Arrian Anabasis 7. 1’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 50, pp. 565-585.
  • Cammarota M. R., 1998, Plutarco, La fortuna o la virtú di Alessandro Magno. Seconda orazione, Napoli.
  • Carlsen J., 2014, ‘Greek history in a Roman context: Arrian’s Anabasis of Alexander’, [in:] J. M. Madsen, R. Rees (eds.), Roman rule in Greek and Latin writing: Double vision, Leiden–Boston, pp. 210-223.
  • Cherniss H., 1976, ‘Introduction’, [in:] H. Cherniss (trans.), Plutarch’s Moralia XIII. 2, Cambridge–London, pp. 369-411.
  • D’Angelo A., 1998, Plutarco, La fortuna o la virtú di Alessandro Magno. Prima orazione, Napoli.
  • Davidson J., 2001, ‘Bonkers about boys’, London Review of Books 23/21, [on-line:] http://www.lrb.co.uk/v23/n21/james-davidson/bonkers-about-boys (accessed 15.01.2016).
  • Devine A. M., 1994, ‘Alexander’s propaganda machine: Callisthenes as the ultimate source for Arrian, Anabasis 1-3’, [in:] I. Worthington (ed.), Ventures in Greek history, Oxford, pp. 89-102.
  • Dillon J., 2013, ‘Plutarch and platonism’, [in:] M. Beck (ed.), A companion to Plutarch, Malden–Oxford, p. 61-72.
  • Dreyer B., 2009, ‘“Jeder hat das Alexander-Bild, das er verdient”: The changing perceptions of Alexander in ancient historiography’, [in:] P. Wheatley, R. Hannah (eds.), Alexander & his successors: Essays from the Antipodes, Claremont, pp. 56-71.
  • Droysen J. G., 1833, Geschichte Alexanders des Groβen, Hamburg. Fears J. R., 1974, ‘The Stoic views of the career and character of Alexander the Great’, Philologus 118, pp. 117-130.
  • Duff T. E., 1999, Plutarch’s lives: Exploring virtue and vice, Oxford.
  • Duff T. E., 2013, ‘The Prologues’, [in:] M. Beck (ed.), A companion to Plutarch, Malden–Oxford, pp. 333-349.
  • Fornara Ch. W., 1988, The nature of history of ancient Greece and Rome, Berkeley– Los Angeles–London.
  • Görgemanns H., 2003, ‘Biographie’, [in:] H. Cancik, H. Schneider (eds.), Brill‘s New Pauly, vol. I, Leiden–Boston, pp. 648-654.
  • Goukowsky P., 1978, Essai sur les origines du mythe d’Alexandre, t. I: Les origines politiques, Nancy.
  • Gray V. J., 1990, ‘The moral interpretation of the ‘second preface’ to Arrian’s Anabasis’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 110, pp. 180-186.
  • Grethlein J., 2013, Experience and teleology in ancient historiography: Futures past from Herodotus to Augustine, Cambridge.
  • Groag E., Stein A., 1933, Prosopographia Imperii Romani I (A-B), Berlin.
  • Hägg T., 2012, The art of biography in Antiquity, Cambridge.
  • Hamilton J. R. 1969. Plutarch, Alexander: A commentary, Oxford.
  • Hamilton J. R., 1978, ‘Introduction’, [in:] Arrian, The campaigns of Alexander, trans. A. de Selincourt, Harmondsworth, pp. 13-40.
  • Hammond N. G. L., 1983, Three historians of Alexander the Great: The so called vulgate authors, Diodorus, Justin and Curtius, Cambridge.
  • Hammond N. G. L., 1988, ‘The royal journal of Alexander’, Historia 37, pp. 129-150.
  • Hammond N. G. L., 1989, Alexander the Great: King, commander and statesman, Bristol.
  • Hammond N. G. L., 1993, Sources for Alexander the Great: An analysis of Plutarch’s Life and Arrian’s Anabasis Alexandrou, Cambridge.
  • Heckel W., 2015, ‘Alexander, Achilles, and Heracles: Between myth and history’, [in:] P. Wheatley, E. Baynham (eds.), East and West in the world empire of Alexander: Essays in honour of Brian Bosworth, Oxford, pp. 21-33.
  • Hengst den D., 2010, ‘Alexander and Rome’, [in:] Emperors and biography: Collected essays on the literature of the Roman Empire, Leiden–Boston, pp. 68-83 (Mnemosyne Supplementum 319).
  • Hershbell J. P., 2004, ‘Plutarch’s political philosophy: Peripatetic and Platonic’, [in:] L. de Blois, J. Bons, T. Kessels, D. M. Schenkeveld (eds.), The statesman in Plutarch’s works, vol. I, Leiden, pp. 151-162 (Mnemosyne Supplementum 250).
  • Hirzel R., 1912, Plutarch, Leipzig.
  • Hornblower S., 1994, ‘Introduction’, [in:] S. Hornblower (ed.), Greek historiography, Oxford, pp. 1-72.
  • Jacoby F., 1962, Die Fragmente der griechischen Historiker (FGrHist), Bd. II.B, Leiden.
  • Jones Ch. P., 1966, ‘Towards a chronology of Plutarch’s works’, Journal of Roman Studies 56, pp. 61-74.
  • Jones Ch. P., 1971, Plutarch and Rome, Oxford.
  • Jones Ch. P., 1978, The Roman world of Dio Chrysostom, Cambridge–London.
  • König J., 2009, Greek literature in the Roman Empire, Bristol.
  • Korus K., 1978, ‘Poezja i malarstwo w literackich poglądach i praktyce Plutarcha z Cheronei’, Eos 66, pp. 203-212.
  • Korus K., 2003, Grecka proza poklasyczna, Kraków.
  • Kraus Shuttleworth Ch., 2010, ‘Historiography and biography’, [in:] A. Barchiesi, W. Scheidel (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Roman studies, Oxford, pp. 403-419.
  • Lane Fox R., 1978, Alexander the Great, London.
  • Leo F., 1901, Die griechisch-römische Biographie nach ihrer litterarischen Form, Leipzig.
  • Lepper F. A., 1948, Trajan’s Parthian War, Oxford.
  • Luce T. J., 1989, ‘Ancient views on the causes of bias in historical writing’, Classical Philology 84, pp. 16-31.
  • Madsen J. M., 2006, ‘Intellectual resistance to Roman hegemony and its representativity’, [in:] T. Bekker-Nielsen (ed.), Rome and the Black Sea region:
  • Domination, romanisation, resistance, Aarhus, pp. 63-84 (Black Sea Studies 5).
  • Marincola J., 1997, Authority and tradition in ancient historiography, Cam- bridge.
  • Marincola J., 1989, ‘Some suggestions on the proem and ‘second preface’ of Arrian’s Anabasis’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 109, pp. 186-189.
  • McInerney J., 2007, ‘Arrian and the Greek Alexander romance’, Classical World 100, pp. 424-430.
  • Mensching E., 1963, ‘Peripatiker über Alexander’, Historia 12, pp. 274-282.
  • Moles J., 1985, ‘The interpretation of the ‘second preface’ in Arrian’s Anabasis’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 105, pp. 162-168.
  • Momigliano A., 1993, The development of Greek biography, Cambridge–London.
  • Mossman J., 1988, ‘Tragedy and epic in Plutarch’s Alexander’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 108, pp. 83-93.
  • Nawotka K. (tłum., koment.), 2010, Pseudo-Kallistenes. Romans o Aleksandrze, Poznań (Fontes Historiae Antiquae 14).
  • Olbrycht M. J., Aleksander Wielki i świat irański, Rzeszów.
  • Opsomer J., 2013, ‘Plutarch and the Stoics’, [in:] M. Beck (ed.), A companion to Plutarch, Malden–Oxford, pp. 88-103.
  • Pearson L., 1955, ‘The diary and letters of Alexander the Great’, Historia 3, pp. 429-455.
  • Pearson L., 1960, The lost Histories of Alexander the Great, New York (American Philological Association, Philological Monographs 20).
  • Pédech P., 1984, Historiens compagnons d’Alexandre. Callisthène, Onésicrite, Néarche, Ptolémée, Aristobule, Paris.
  • Pelling Ch., 2000, Literary texts and the Greek historian, London–New York.
  • Pelling Ch., 2002a, ‘The moralism of Plutarch’s Lives’, [in:] Ch. Pelling, Plutarch and history: Eighteen studies, London, pp. 237-252.
  • Pelling Ch., 2002b, ‘Plutarch’s Caesar: A Caesar for the caesars?’, [in:] P. A. Stadter, L. van der Stockt (eds.), Sage and emperor: Plutarch, Greek intellectuals, and Roman power in the time of Trajan, Leuven, pp. 213-226.
  • Pelling Ch., 2006, ‘Breaking the bounds: Writing about Caesar’, [in:] B. McGing, J. Mossman (eds.), The limits of ancient biography, Swansea, pp. 255-279.
  • Pelling Ch., 2009a, ‘Biography’, [in:] G. Boys-Stones, B. Graziosi, P. Vasunia (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Hellenic studies, Oxford, pp. 608-616.
  • Pelling Ch., 2009b, ‘The first biographers: Plutarch and Suetonius’, [in:] M. Griffin (ed.), A companion to Julius Caesar, Malden–Oxford, pp. 252-266.
  • Pelling Ch., 2011, Plutarch, Caesar, Oxford.
  • Pelling Ch., 2014, ‘Political Philosophy’, [in:] M. Beck (ed.), A companion to Plutarch, Malden–Oxford, pp. 149-162.
  • Powell J. E., 1939, ‘The sources of Plutarch’s Alexander’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 59, pp. 229-240.
  • Pownall F., 2013, ‘Aristoboulos of Kassandreia 139’, [in:] I. Worthington (ed.), Brill’s New Jacoby (BNJ), Leiden, [on-line:] www.brillonline.nl (accessed 15.01.2016).
  • Prandi L., 1996, Fortuna e realtà dell’opera di Clitarco, Stuttgart (Historia Einzelschriften 104).
  • Prandi L., 2000, ‘L’Alessandro di Plutarco (Riflessioni su De Al. Magn. Fort. e su Alex.)’, [in:] L. van der Stockt (ed.), Rhetorical theory and praxis in Plutarch, Leuven, pp. 375-386.
  • Roisman J., 1983-1984, ‘Why Arrian wrote the Anabasis’, Rivista Storica dell’ Antichita 13-14, pp. 253-263.
  • Roisman J., 1984, ‘Ptolemy and his rivals in his history of Alexander’, Classical Quarterly 74, pp. 373-385.
  • Romm J., 2010, ‘Annotations’, [in] The landmark Arrian: The campaigns of Alexander. Anabasis Alexandrou, trans. P. Mensch, New York.
  • Russell D. A., 1973, Plutarch, New York.
  • Rutherford R. B., 1991, The meditations of Marcus Aurelius: A study, Oxford.
  • Rzepka J., 2006, Monarchia macedońska. Zgromadzenie i obywatelstwo u schyłku epoki klasycznej i w okresie hellenistycznym, Warszawa.
  • Rzepka J., 2015, ‘Callisthenes of Olynthos 124’, [in:] : I. Worthington (ed.), Brill’s New Jacoby (BNJ), Leiden, [on-line:] www.brillonline.nl (forthcoming).
  • Schachermeyr F., 1949, Alexander der Grosse. Ingenium und Macht, Graz–Salzburg–Wien.
  • Schachter A., 2014, ‘Plutarch of Chaeronea 388’, [in:] : I. Worthington (ed.), Brill’s New Jacoby (BNJ), Leiden, [on-line:] www.brillonline.nl (accessed 12.01.2016).
  • Scheller P., 1911, De hellenistica historiae conscribendae arte, Lipsiae.
  • Schepens G., 1971, ‘Arrian’s view of his task as Alexander historian’, Ancient Society 2, pp. 254-268.
  • Schneeweiss G., 1979, ‘History and philosophy in Plutarch’, [in:] G. Bowersock, W. Burkert, M. C. J. Putnam (eds.), ARKTOUROS. Hellenic studies presented to B. M. W. Knox, Berlin–New York, pp. 376-382.
  • Schorn S., 2014, ‘Biographie und Autobiographie’, [in:] B. Zimmermann, A. Rengakos (eds.), Die Literatur der klassischen und hellenistischen Zeit, München, pp. 678-732.
  • Schoene A., 1870, De rerum Alexandri Magni scriptorum, imprimis Arriani et Plutarchi fontibus, Lipsiae (Analecta Philologica Historica I).
  • Schwartz E., 1895, ‘Arrianus (9)’, [in:] P. Wissowa (Hrsg.), Paulys Real-enzyklopädie der classischen Altertumwissenschaft, Bd. II/1, Stuttgart, col. 1230-1247.
  • Sherwin-White A. N., 1966, The letters of Pliny: A historical and social commentary, Oxford.
  • Sinko T., 1951, Literatura grecka, t. III/1, Kraków.
  • Sisti F., 2001, ‘Introduzione’, [in:] Arriano, Anabasi di Alessandro, t. I, trad. A. Zambrini, Roma, pp. XI-LXVI.
  • Sisti F., 2002, ‘La doppia prefazione del Alessandri Anabasis di Arriano’, [in:] E. Lelli (a cura di), Arma virumque… Studi di poesia e storiografia in onore di Luca Canali, Pisa–Roma, pp. 41-44.
  • Spencer D., 2002, The Roman Alexander: Reading a cultural myth, Exeter.
  • Stadter P. A., 1980, Arrian of Nicomedia, Chapel Hill–London.
  • Stadter P. A., 1981, ‘Arrian’s extended preface’, Illinois Classical Studies 6, pp. 157-171.
  • Stadter P. A., 1988, ‘The proems to Plutarch’s Lives’, Illinois Classical Studies 13, pp. 275-295.
  • Stadter P. A., 1989, A commentary on Plutarch’s Pericles, Chapel Hill–London.
  • Stadter P. A., 2002, ‘Plutarch and Trajanic ideology’, [in:] P. A. Stadter, L. van der Stockt (eds.), Sage and emperor: Plutarch, Greek intellectuals, and Roman power in the time of Trajan, Leuven, pp. 227-241.
  • Stadter P. A., 2007, ‘Biography and history’, [in:] J. Marincola (ed.), A companion to Greek and Roman historiography, vol. II, Malden–Oxford, pp. 528-440.
  • Stadter P. A., 2014a, ‘The philosopher’s ambitions: Plutarch, Arrian and Marcus Aurelius’ [in:] P. A. Stadter, Plutarch & his Roman readers, Oxford, pp. 199-214.
  • Stadter P. A., 2014b, ‘Plutarch and Rome’, [in:] M. Beck (ed.), A companion to Plutarch, Malden–Oxford, pp. 13-31.
  • Steele R. B., 1916, ‘Plutarch’s “Alexander” and Arrian’s “Anabasis”’, Classical Philology 11, pp. 419-425.
  • Stewart A., 1993, Faces of power: Alexander’s image and Hellenistic politics, Berkeley–Los Angeles–Oxford (Hellenistic Culture and Society 11).
  • Stoneman R. 2003, ‘The legacy of Alexander in ancient philosophy’, [in:] J. Roisman (ed.), Brill’s companion to Alexander the Great, Leiden–Boston, pp. 325-345.
  • Strasburger H., 1982, ‘Ptolemaios und Alexander’, [in:] H. Strasburger, Studien zur Alten Geschichte, Bd. I, Hildesheim–New York, pp. 83-148.
  • Swain S., 1996, Hellenism and Empire: Language, classicism, and power in the Greek world AD 50-250, Oxford.
  • Syme R., 1958, Tacitus, Oxford.
  • Syme R., 1982, , ‘The career of Arrian’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 86, pp. 181-211.
  • Szarmach M., 1979, Dion z Prusy. Monografia historyczno-literacka, Toruń.
  • Tarn W. W., 1948, Alexander the Great, vol. II, Cambridge.
  • Tonnet H., 1988, Recherches sur Arrien: sa personnalité et ses écrit atticistes, t. I-II, Amsterdam.
  • Vidal-Naquet P., 1984, ‘Flavius Arrien entre deux mondes’, [in:] Arrien, Histoire d’Alexandre. L’ Anabase d’Alexandre le Grand et l’ Inde, trad. P. Savinel, Paris, pp. 311-394.
  • Wade-Gery H. T., 2012, ‘Thucydides (2)’, [in:] S. Hornblower, A. Spawforth, E. Eidinow (eds.), The Oxford classical dictionary. Fourth edition, Oxford, pp. 1471-1477.
  • Wardle D. (ed.), 2014, Suetonius. Life of Augustus, Oxford.
  • Wardman A. E, 1955, ‘Plutarch and Alexander’, Classical Quarterly 5, pp. 96-107.
  • Wheeldon M. J., 1989, ‘“True stories”: The reception of historiography in Antiquity’, [in:] A. Cameron (ed.), History as text: The writing of ancient history, London, pp. 33-63.
  • Wheeler E. L., 1977, Flavius Arrianus: A political and military biography, Durham NC (Duke University PhD. Diss.).
  • Whitby M., 2012, ‘Onesikritos 134’, [in:] I. Worthington (ed.), Brill’s New Jacoby (BNJ), Leiden, [on-line:] www.brillonline.nl (accessed 12.01.2016).
  • Whitmarsh T., 2001, Greek literature and the Roman Empire: The politics of imitation, Oxford.
  • Whitmarsh T., 2004, Ancient Greek literature, Cambridge–Malden.
  • Whitmarsh T., 2005, The Second Sophistic, Oxford (Greece & Rome New Surveys in the Classics 35).
  • Wiemer H.-U., 2011, ‘Held, Gott oder Tyrann? Alexander der Grosse im frühen Hellenismus’, Hermes 139, pp. 179-204.
  • Wilcken U., 1967, Alexander the Great, New York.
  • Wirth G., 1974, ‘Arrian und Traian’, Studi classice 16, pp. 169-209.
  • Wirth G., 1976, ‘Alexander und Rom’, [in:] E. Badian (éd.), Alexandre le Grand: Image et réalité, Geneva, pp. 181-210 (Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 22).
  • Wiseman T. P., 1993, ‘Lying historians: Seven types of mendacity’, [in:] Ch. Gill, T. P. Wiseman (eds.), Lies and fiction in the ancient world, Exeter, pp. 122-146.
  • Zambrini A., 2007, ‘The historians of Alexander the Great’, [in:] J. Marincola (ed.), A companion to Greek and Roman historiography, vol. I, Malden– Oxford, pp. 210-220.
  • Zecchini G., 1983, ‘Modelli e problemi teorici della storiografia nell’etá degli Antonini’, Critica storica 20, pp. 3-31.
  • Zecchini G., 1984, ‘Alessandro Magno nella cultura dell’età antonina’, [in:] M. Sordi (a cura di), Alessandro Magno tra storia e mito, Milano, pp. 195-212.
  • Ziegler K., 1949, Plutarchos von Chaironeia, Stuttgart–Waldsee.

Document Type

Publication order reference


YADDA identifier

JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.