PL EN


2016 | 25/2 | 5-29
Article title

Old English without Short Diphthongs: An Alternative Historical Phonology

Authors
Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
As there are serious questions about whether short diphthongs are possible phonemes, the question arises as to what the prehistory of Old English would be without short diphthongs. The most important question is what breaking was, and the answer given is that breaking was a conditioned change of /xʲ to /xˠ/ in noble dialect, in reaction against /xʲ/ in peasant dialect, itself motivated by the phonology of Brittonic. Such a scenario involves violating some of the foundational assumptions of the field, and the violations in question are noted. Examination reveals other cases of Brittonic influence, which apply not only to Old English but to Anglo-Frisian generally, supporting the idea that the Frisians originated as Angles who were driven back the continent. Fundamentally, the idea is to show that a prehistory of Old English without short diphthongs is possible.
Contributors
  • University of Texas at Austin
References
  • Bazelmans, Jos. 2009. “The Early Medieval Use of Ethnic Names from Classical Antiquity: the Case of the Frisians.” Ethnic Constructs in Antiquity: The Role of Power and Tradition. Ed. Ton Derks, and Nico Roymans. Amsterdam: Amsterdam UP. 321–338.
  • Bremmer, Rolf. 2009. An Introduction to Old Frisian: History, Grammar, Reader, Glossary. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Company.
  • Daunt, Marjorie. 1939. “Old English Sound Changes Reconsidered in Relation to Scribal Tradition and Practice.” Transactions of the Philological Society 38:108–137.
  • Hockett, Charles. 1959. “The Stressed Syllabics of Old English.” Language 33:575–597.
  • Hogg, Richard. 1992. A Grammar of Old English. Volume 1: Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell. Jackson, Kenneth. 1953. Language and History in Early Britain. Dublin: Four Courts Press.
  • Ladefoged, P., and I. Maddieson. 1996. The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Oppenheimer, Stephen. 2006. The Origins of the British. New York: Caroll & Graf.
  • Preusler, Walther. 1938. “Keltischer Einfluss im Englischen. ” Indogermanische Forschungen 56: 178–191.
  • Schrijver, Peter. 1995. Studies in British Celtic Phonology. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
  • Stenton, Frank. [1971] 1989. Anglo-Saxon England. 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford UP.
  • Tristram, Hildegard. 1995. “Linguistic Contacts Across the English Channel: The Case History of the Retroflex <r>.” Linguistic Change under Contact Conditions. Ed. Jacek Fisiak. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 291–313.
  • White, David L. 2004. “Why We Should not Believe in Short Diphthongs.” Studies in the History of the English Language II: Unfolding Conversations. Ed. A. Curzan, and K. Emmons. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 57–84
  • White, David L. 2006. “On the Areal Pattern of “Brittonicity” in English and Its Implications.” Celtic Englishes IV: The Interface Between Celtic and English. Ed. Hildegard Tristram. Potsdam: Universität Potsdam. 306–335.
  • White, David L. 2015. “Old English Without Short Diphthongs: The Outlines of a New Interpretation.” Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies 24/2: 5–26.
  • Wright, Joseph, and Elizabeth Mary Wright. 1928. An Elementary Middle English Grammar. 2nd edition. London: Oxford UP.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-044b53fd-bef7-41cd-80f8-9e96438ae3d0
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.