Solar Energy Conversion Methods

• Authors: SOBCZYK WIKTORIA , NAGORNIUK OKSANA , RIABUSHENKO OLGA , WLIZŁO JAKUB
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This article presents the characteristics of three basic methods of solar energy conversion: thermal energy – photothermal conversion, electrical energy – photovoltaic conversion, energy related to chemical processes – photochemical conversion. The paper addresses some aspects of the primary goals of EU climate and energy policy, as well as the benefits of passive building constructions.

Keywords

EN

solar energy conversion; energy policy; education

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Rzeszowski
• Journal: Edukacja-Technika-Informatyka
• Year: 2018
• Volume: 9
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 73-76

Contributors

author

SOBCZYK WIKTORIA

• Professor of the AGH University of Science & Technology, Faculty of Mining & Geoengineering, Krakow, Poland

author

NAGORNIUK OKSANA

• Doctor of the Department of Environment, Natural and Mathematical Sciences, Municipal Higher Educational Institution “Vinnitsa academy of continuous education”, Ukraine

author

RIABUSHENKO OLGA

• PhD student, Institute of Agroecology and Natural Resources of NAAS, Ukraine

author

WLIZŁO JAKUB

• M.Sc. ing., BESTA Przedsiębiorstwo Budowlane sp. z o.o. Rzeszów, Poland

References

• Bogoliubov, V.M., Nagorniuk, O.M., Sobczyk, W. (2016). Providing Environmental Training in the Context of Ukraine’s Transition to Sustainable Development. Annals of Agrarian Science, Ecological Agricultural and Nature Conservation, 14 (4), 292–294.
• http://www.passivesolarenergy.info (27.12.2017).
• Ostrowska, A., Sobczyk, W., Pawul, M. (2013). Evaluation of Economic and Ecological Effects of Solar Energy on the Example of a Single-family House. Annual Set The Environment Protec-tion, 15, 2697–2710.
• Sobczyk, W., Pelc, P., Kowal, B., Ranosz, R. (2017). Ecological and Economical Aspects of Solar Energy Use. E3S Web of Conferences, 14, 01011, 1–8.
• Wielewska, I., Sobczyk, W., Gliniak, M. (2017). Energia z OZE jako dobrobyt społeczny w opinii polskich rolników. Folia Pomer. Univ. Technol. Stetin., Oeconomica, 333 (86) 1, 91–100.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15584/eti.2018.1.8