PL EN


2014 | 4 | 1 | 172-178
Article title

Learning styles and Locus of control in undergraduate medical, nursing and physiotherapy students: a comparative study

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
Introduction: Locus of control is a personality variable which influences expectancies that people have in relation to everyday outcomes. The orientation on the Locus of control can be internal or external. People with internal orientation on locus of control attribute outcomes to their own control whereas those with external orientation tend to blame others for what happens to them. Internal orientation on locus of control has been found to correlate with attainment and general student satisfaction. Locus of control has been explored in health care related disciplines as well as in relation to learning characteristics, education in general and academic performance in particular. Purpose: To explore potential relationship between learning styles and Locus of control. To examine possible differences, in the learning styles and Locus of control orientation between Medical, Nursing and Physiotherapy undergraduate students. Materials and methods: A cross – sectional survey of undergraduate medical, physiotherapy and nursing students was conducted, at an English London university. The Learning Styles Inventory and Locus of Control Internal External Scale were administered to a purposive sample of students in their first year of study (n = 379). Results: The BSc Nursing students had the highest Locus of Control score (mean = 12.43, SD 4.164) and medical students the lowest (mean = 10.32, SD 4.034). Students who were carers had a lower mean Locus of Control score of 10.65, SD 3.713 as compared with students who were not carers, Locus of Control = 12.39, SD 4.108. Linear regressions showed statistical significance of different Kolb’s learning styles on the Locus of Control. KOLB-Abstract Conceptualisation (AC) had a statistically significant impact on Locus of Control (p=0.022). The dominant learning style of the nursing students in this study was assimilating (35%) and accommodating (26%). Conclusions: The findings from this study demonstrate that perhaps learning styles are not necessarily profession specific and that maybe the nursing students in this sample used more balancing styles which were influenced by the teaching methods and their curriculum. The implications for future research and educators are also discussed.
Year
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
172-178
Physical description
Contributors
author
author
author
References
  • Kolb DA. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall, Inc., New Jersey, 1984
  • Rotter JB. Generalized Expectancies for Internal versus External Control of Reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied. 2005; 80(1): 1-28.
  • Manolis C, Burns DJ, Assudani R, Chinta R. Assessing experiential learning styles: A methodological reconstruction and validation of the Kolb Learning Style Inventory. Learn Individ Differ. 2013 Feb;23:44-52.
  • Coker CA, Pedersen SJ. Context and test-retest reliability of Kolb's Learning Style Inventory. Psychol Rep. 2004 Aug;95(1):180-2.
  • Gray RL. Dissertations Abstracts International Section A; Humanities and Social Sciences. 2003; 64(3-A),822.
  • D'Amore A, James S, Mitchell EK. Learning styles of first-year undergraduate nursing and midwifery students: a cross-sectional survey utilising the Kolb Learning Style Inventory. Nurse Educ Today. 2012 Jul;32(5):506-15.
  • El-Gilani AH, Abusaad FES. Self–directed learning readiness and learning styles among Saudi undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Sep;33(9):1040-4.
  • Robles J, Cox CD, Seifert CF. The impact of preceptor and student learning styles on experiential performance measures. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Sep;10;76(7):128.
  • Armstrong E, Parsa-Parsi R. How can physicians' learning styles drive educational planning? Acad Med. 2005 Jul;80(7):680-4.
  • Coffield F, Moseley D, Hall E, Ecclestone K. Learning styles and pedagogy in post 16 learning: A systematic and critical review. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre. 2004.
  • Kolb DA. Learning Style Inventory. Hay Group Holdings, Inc., Boston, 1993.
  • Sutphin ARH. Learning styles, epistemological beliefs, and information resource use by first year medical students in a problem based learning curriculum Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences. 2004; (65)1-A, 91.
  • Smits PBA, Verbeek JHM, Nauta MCE, Cate TJT, Metz JCM, Van Dijk FJH. Factors predictive of successful learning in postgraduate medical education. Med Educ. 2004 Jul;38(7): 758-66.
  • Rennie G. An investigation of the learning styles of undergraduate physical therapy students and practicing Physical therapists Dissertation abstracts International section A: Humanities and Social services. 2004;64(7-a): 2384.
  • Cavenhagh SJ, Hogan K. Ramgopal T. The assessment of student nurse learning styles using the Kolb learning style inventory Nurse Educ Today. 1995 Jun;15(3):177-83.
  • Olivieri J. An exploration of the relationship between diagnostic reasoning ability and learning style in undergraduate nursing students. Classification of nursing diagnosis: proceedings of 9th International conference held in Orlando. Carroll-Johnson R.M; J.B. Lippincott, 1991; pp.285-6.
  • Marra SE. An exploration of critical thinking, learning style, locus of control, and environmental perception in baccalaureate nursing students West Virginia University ED. D; 1997.
  • Tulbure C. Learning styles, teaching strategies and academic achievement in higher education: A cross-sectional investigation. Social Behav Sci. 2012; 33:398-402
  • Lefcourt HM.(ed) Research with the Locus of Control Construct: Vol. 2. Developments and Social Problems. San Diego, CA, Academic Press, 1983.
  • Lefcourt HM. Locus of Control. In Robinson, JP, Shaver PR, Wrightsman LS. (eds) (1991) Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, Vol.1, San Diego, CA, Academic Press, 1991.
  • Lefcourt HM. Durability and Impact of the Locus of Control Construct. Psychol Bull. 1992; 112(3): 411-4.
  • Spector PE. Behaviour in Organisations as a Function of Employee's Locus of Control. Psychol Bull. 1982; 91(3):482-97.
  • Ponto MT. Relationship between students’ locus of control and satisfaction. Br J Nurs. Feb 11-24;8(3):176-81.
  • McGhan WF, Draugalis J, Bootman Jl, Pelter MA, Adamcik B, Martinoff J. Identification of Factors Associated with Student Satisfaction and Commitment to Pharmacy Practice. Am J Pharm Educ. 1985; 49: 124-9. .
  • Linares AZ. A comparative study of learning characteristics of RN and generic students. J Nurs Educ. 1989 Oct;28(8):354-60.
  • Millar R, Irving P. Academic Locus of Control in British Undergraduate Students. Br J Educ Psychol. 1995; 65:331-40.
  • Ibrahim AM. A Cross-Cultural Validation of Trice’s Academic Locus of Control Scale for College Students in an Omani Sample. Percept Motor Skill. 1996; 83:823-9.
  • Wang Q, Bowling NA, Eschleman KJ. A Meta-Analytic Examination of Work and General Locus of Control. J Appl Psychol. 1999;95(4): 761-8
  • Ponto MT. Locus of control: an exploration of nursing students’ views on control, autonomy and satisfaction. Unpublished PhD Thesis, South Bank London University; 2004.
  • Peterson C, Stunkard AJ. Personal Control and Health Promotion. Soc Sci Med. 1989;28(8): 819-28.
  • Hay Group Learning styles Inventory Hay Publications; 2005.
  • Bandura A. Human agency: The rhetoric and the reality. Am Psychol. 1991;46(2): 157-62.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-080a67a5-604b-4f45-ac3e-684509f57e58
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.