2018 | 27 | 3 | 375-413
Article title

Normative Consistency: An Xstit Account

Title variants
Languages of publication
In this paper we take inspiration from a couple of authors on how to think about normative (in)consistency, and then show how to conceive of normative inconsistency in an xstit framework. One view on normative inconsistency is from von Wright, and the other from Hamblin. These two accounts share a conception of normative inconsistency, but their formal frameworks are very different. We propose a way to get the best of both views on normative inconsistency by using an xstit framework, mixed with a version of Anderson’s reduction of deontic logic to alethic modal logic. We consider variations on those ideas and relate it to a work of Ruth Barcan Marcus.
Physical description
  • Department of Philosophy University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada
  • Abdou, J., and H. Keiding, Effectivity Functions in Social Choice, volume 8 of “Theory and Decision Lbrary. Series C, Game Theory, Mathematical Programmlng, and Ooperat1ons Research”, Springer, Dordrecht,1991. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-3448-4
  • Ågotnes, T., W. van der Hoek, J.A. Rodríguez-Aguilar, C. Sierra, and M. Wooldridge, “On the logic of normative systems”, in G. Boella, L.W.N. van der Torre, and H. Verhagen (eds.), Normative Multiagent Systems, volume 07122 of Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Internationales Begegnungs- und Forschungszentrum für Informatik (IBFI),Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany, 2007.
  • Alchourrón, C.E., “Conflicts of norms and the revision of normative systems”, Law and Philosophy 10 (1991): 413–25. DOI: 10.2307/3504843
  • Anderson, A.R., “A reduction of deontic logic to alethic modal logic”, Mind, 67, 265 (1958): 100–103. DOI: 10.1093/mind/LXVII.265.100
  • Belnap, N., and M. Perloff, “The way of the agent”, Studia Logica 51, 3–4 (1992): 463–484. DOI: 10.1007/BF01028971
  • Braybrooke, D., B. Brown, and P. Schotch, Logic on the Track of Social Change, Clarendon Library of Logic and Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198235309.001.0001
  • Broersen, J., “On the reconciliation of logics of agency and logics of event types”, chapter 3, pages 41–60, in R. Trypuz (ed.), Krister Segerberg on the Logic of Actions, volume 1 of “Outstanding Contributions to Logic”, Springer, Dordrecht, 2014. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7046-1_3
  • Broersen, J., and J.-J.C. Meyer, “Action, failure and free will choice in stit logic”, chapter 8, pages 141–168, in F. Lihoreau and M. Rebuschi (eds.), Epistemology, Context and Formalism, Synthese Library, Springer, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-02943-6_9
  • Chellas, B.F., Modal Logic: An introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1980. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511621192
  • Czelakowski, J., Freedom and Enforcement in Action: Elements of Formal Action Theory, volume 42 of “Trends in Logic”, Springer, Dordrecht, 2015. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-9855-6
  • Grossi, D., “Desgining invisible handcuffs”, PhD thesis, University of Utrecht, September 2007, SIKS Dissertation Series no. 2007-16.
  • Grossi, D., “Norms as ascriptions of violations: An analysis in modal logic”, Journal of Applied Logic 9, 2 (2011): 95–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.jal.2010.03.002
  • Hamblin, C.L., “Quandries and the logic of rules”, Journal of Philosophical Logic 1, 1 (1972): 74–85.
  • Hohfeld, W.N., Fundamentals of Legal Concepts, Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn, 1920. Reprinted 1964.
  • Jones, A.J.I., and M. Sergot, “A formal characterization of institutionalized power”, Logic Jnl IGPL 4, 3 (1996): 427–443.
  • Makinson, D., “On the formal representation of rights relations”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 15, 4 (1986): 403–425. DOI: 10.1007/BF00243391
  • Marcus, R.B., “Moral dilemmas and consistency”, The Journal of Philosophy 77, 3 (1980): 121–136. DOI: 10.2307/2025665
  • Pauly, M., “Logics for social software”, PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 2001, Dissertation Series DS-2001-10.
  • Searle, J., The Construction of Social Reality, The Free Press, 1995.
  • Searle, J., Making the Social World, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2010. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195396171.001.0001
  • Stolpe, A., Norms and Norm-System Dynamics, Department of Philosophy, University of Bergen, Norway, 2008.
  • van Hees, M., “Some general results on responsibility for outcomes”, chapter 7, pages 99–109, in A. van Deeman and A. Rusinowska (eds.), Collective Decision Making, “Theory and Decision Library. Series C”, Springer, Heidelberg, 2010. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02865-6_7
  • von Wright, G.H., “Is there a logic of norms?”, Ratio Juris 4, 3 (1991): 265–283. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9337.1991.tb00099.x
  • Weinberger, O., “The expressive conception of norms: An impasse for the logic of norms”, Law and Philosophy 4, 2 (1985): 165–198. DOI: 10.2307/3504669
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.