Creativity as a travelling concept: from Alexander Gerard to Richard Florida

• Authors: Kukołowicz Tomasz

Title variants

PL

Kreatywność jako wędrujące pojęcie: od Alexandra Gerarda do Richarda Florid

• Languages of publication: PL EN

Abstracts

EN

Artykuł opisuje kreatywność jako wędrujące pojęcie. Napisany jest z perspektywy interdyscyplinarnej i historycznej. Za punkt wyjścia służy XVIII wiek, w którym Alexander Gerard i William Duff, dwóch szkockich myślicieli, położyło fundamenty pod nowoczesne rozumienie kreatywności. Następnym celem jest druga połowa XIX wieku, w której Francis Galton opublikował ważną książkę na temat geniuszu, która znacząco wpłynęła na teorię inteligencji z początku XX wieku. Później omówiona została propozycja Joya P. Guilforda z 1950 roku, żeby badać kreatywność jako osobne zagadnienie. W ostatniej części artykułu opisano najnowsze ujęcia kreatywności, między innymi codziennej twórczości oraz przemysłów kreatywnych.

Keywords

PL

kreatywność; wyobraźnia; inteligencja; wędrujące pojęcie; Alexander Gerard

EN

creativity; imagination; intelligence; travelling concept; Alexander Gerard

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych
• Journal: Problemy Zarządzania
• Year: 2014
• Issue: 4/2014 (49) t.2
• Pages: 11 – 28

Dates

published

2014-12-15

Contributors

author

Kukołowicz Tomasz

• Institute of Philosophy and Sociology PAN, National Centre for Culture

References

• Addison, J. (1712). Pleasures of Imagination. The Spectator, June 21–July 3, 411–421.
• Aristotle. (1996). Works of Aristotle. Vol. II. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica.
• Bal, M. (2002). Travelling Concepts in the Humanities: A Rough Guide. Toronto, Buffalo, London: University of Toronto Press.
• Binet, A. and Simon, T. (1916). The Development of Intelligence in Children (The Binet- Simon Scale). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
• Carlyle, T. (1861). On heroes, hero-worship, & the heroic in history: six lectures. New York: John Wiley.
• Cassirer, E. (1951). The Philosophy of the Enlightenment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Cattell, J.M. (1903). A statistical study of eminent men. Popular Science Monthly, 62, 359–377.
• Caves, R. (2000). Creative Industries: Contracts between Art and Commerce. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Cocking, J.M. (1991). Imagination: A Study in the history of ideas. Penelope Murray (Ed.). London: Routledge.
• Craft, A. (2000). Creativity Across the Primary Curriculum. London and New York: Routledge.
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper & Row.
• Department for Culture, Media & Sport. (1998). Creative Industries Mapping Documents 1998. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/creative-industriesmapping- documents-1998 (26.09.2013).
• Department for Culture, Media & Sport. (2001). Creative Industries Mapping Documents 2001. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/creative-industriesmapping-documents-2001 (26.09.2013).
• Department of Communications and the Arts. (1994). Creative nation: Commonwealth cultural policy. Retrieved from: http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/21336/20031011-0000/
• www.nla.gov.au/creative.nation/contents.html (26.09.2013).
• Duff, W. (1767). An essay on original genius; and its various modes of exertion in philosophy and the fine arts, particularly in poetry. London: E. and C. Dilly.
• Ellis, H. (1904). A study of British genius. London: Hurst and Blackett. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Online edition (2013). Retrieved from: http://www.britannica.com/ (24.09.2013).
• Engell, J. (1981). The Creative Imagination. Enlightenment to Romanticism. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
• Ericsson, D. (2001). Caught in the Iron Cage of Creativity – The Ten Commandments of the Creative Field, Paper to The Second International Critical Management Studies Conference 2001. Retrieved from: http://www.mngt.waikato.ac.nz/ejrot/cmsconference/2001/Papers/Creativity/cmsironcage.pdf (24.09.2013).
• Eysenck, H.J. (1995). Genius: The Natural History of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
• Galton, F. (1865). Hereditary talent and character. Macmillan’s Magazine, 12, 157–166 and 318–327.
• Galton, F. (1892). Hereditary Genius. An Inquiry into Its Laws and Consequences, 2nd ed. London and New York: McMillan.
• Gerard, A. (1759). An Essay on Taste, with Three Dissertations on the same Subject, by Mr. De Voltaire, Mr. D’Alembert, F.R.S., and Mr. DeMontesquieu. London: A. Millar and Edinburgh: A. Kincaid and J. Bell.
• Gerard, A. (1774). An Essay on Genius. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell, and Edinburgh: W. Creech.
• Glaeser, E.L. (2005). Review of Richard Florida’s The Rise of the Creative Class. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35, 593–596.
• Goddard, H.H. (1916). Introduction. In: A. Binet and T. Simon, The Development of Intelligence in Children (The Binet-Simon Scale). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
• Guilford, J.P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454.
• Guilford, J.P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Guyer, P. (2011). Gerard and Kant: Influence and Opposition. The Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 9(1), 59–93.
• Howkins, J. (2001). The Creative Economy: How People Make Money From Ideas. London and New York: Penguin.
• Hoyman, M. and Faricy, C. (2009). It Takes a Village: A Test of the Creative Class, Social Capital and Human Capital Theories. Urban Affairs Review, 44(3), 311–333.
• Kant, I. (1950). The Critique of Judgement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• KEA. (2006). Economy of Culture in Europe. European Commission. Retrieved from: http://www.keanet.eu/ecoculture/studynew.pdf (26.09.2013).
• Kukołowicz, T. (2012). Ponowoczesność oczami geografa. Studia Socjologiczne, 3(206), 163–169.
• Lombroso, C. (1891). The man of genius. London: W. Scott and New York: C. Scribner’s sons.
• Markusen, A. (2006). Urban development and the politics of the creative class: Evidence from the study of artists. Environment and Planning A, 38(1), 1921–1940.
• Murray, P. (Ed.). (1989). Genius. The History of an Idea. Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell.
• OED Online. June 2014. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from: http://www.oed.com/ (30.01.2014).
• Peck, J. (2007). The creativity fix. Fronesis, 24. Retrieved from: http://www.eurozine.com/ articles/2007-06-28-peck-en.html (26.09.2012).
• Plato. (1925). Ion. In: Plato. Plato in Twelve Volumes (Vol. 9). Cambridge, MA: Harvard
• University Press and London: William Heinemann Ltd.
• Reckwitz, A. (2012). Die Erfindung der Kreativität. Zum Prozess gesellschaftlicher Ästhetisierung. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
• Richards, R. (2007b). Everyday Creativity and the Arts. World Futures: The Journal of Global Education, 63(7), 500–525.
• Richards, R. (2010). Everyday Creativity: Process and Way of Life – Four Key Issues. In: J. C. Kaufman and R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Richards, R. (Ed.) (2007a). Everyday Creativity and New Views of Human Nature. Psychological, Social and Spiritual Perspectives. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
• Richards, R., Kinney, D.K., Benet, M. and Merzel, A.P.C. (1988). Assessing Everyday Creativity: Characteristics of the Lifetime Creativity Scales and Validation With Three Large Samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 476–485.
• Rubenson, D.L. and Runco, M.A. (1992). The psychoeconomic approach to creativity. New Ideas in Psychology, 10, 131–147.
• Runco, M.A. (1996). Personal creativity: Definition and developmental issues. New Directions for Child Development, 72, 3–30.
• Runco, M.A. (2004). Everyone has creative potential. In: R.J. Sternberg, E.L. Grigorenko and J.L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 21–30). Baltimore: American Psychological Association.
• Runco, M.A. and Albert, R.S. (2010). Creativity Research: A Historical View. In: J.C. Kaufman and R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Runco, M.A. and Jaeger, G.J. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96.
• Runco, M.A. and Richards R. (Eds.). (1998). Eminent Creativity, Everyday Creativity, and Health: New Work on the Creativity/Health Interface. Greenwich and London: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
• Silva, P.J., and Kaufman J.C. (2010). Creativity and Mental Illness. In: J.C. Kaufman and R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Simonton, D.K. (1999). Origins of Genius: Darwinian Perspectives on Creativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Simonton, D.K. (2009). Genius 101. New York: Springer.
• Thiel, J. (2005). Ambivalences of Creative Class Policies: Targeting Reflexive Labour in Creative Industries. AESOP 2005 Vienna, best congress paper. Retrieved from: http:// aesop2005.scix.net/cgi-bin/papers/Show?617 (26.09.2013).
• Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Throsby, D. (2010). The Economics of Cultural Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Towse, R. (2010). A Textbook of Cultural Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• UNCTAD. (2008). Creative Economy. Report 2008. New York: United Nations.
• UNCTAD. (2010). Creative Economy. Report 2010. New York: United Nations.
• Weekley, E. (1921). An Etymological Dictionary of Modern English. London: J. Murray.
• Weiner, R. (2000). Creativity & Beyond. Cultures, Values, and Change. New York: State University of New York Press.
• Wróbel, S. (2012). The Concept of Linguistic Intelligence and Beyond. In: M. Pawlak (Ed.), New Perspectives on Individual Differences in Language Learning and Teaching
• Second Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 115–126). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.

Identifiers

ISSN

10.7172/1644-9584.49.1

DOI

1644-9584