Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2017 | No. 2 | 213-230

Article title

The premise of the effect on trade among EU member states in projects concerning culture and heritage conservation within the framework of the implementation of the projects from EU funds – recommendations for judicial decisions

Content

Title variants

Conference

Judicial review of the decision of the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
Public aid can be involved even in such peculiar public activity sector as culture and heritage conservation. Hence, the EU projects implemented in this area may be subject to legal restrictions on state aid. In this respect, particular legal doubts concerning state aid arise in the context of “impact on trade” premise. This situation is a consequence of both lack of clear definition thereof and the peculiar nature of culture projects. The present paper is aimed at identifying particular issues that ought to be taken into account when determining the possible impact on trade (recommendations for judicature). These issues aren’t actually defined in law, but only in few judgments and literature. Hence, there is a necessity to make further researches.

Year

Issue

Pages

213-230

Physical description

Dates

online
2017-06-30

Contributors

References

  • Barcz J. (ed.) (2006), European Union Law. Systemic issues. Material law and the policies, The Law and the Business Practice, Warszawa.
  • Dudzik S. (2002), State aid for public enterprises in the European Community Law. Between neutrality and commitment, Zakamycze, Kraków.
  • Fourth survey from the Commission on state aid in the European Union in the manufacturing and certain other sectors.
  • COM (95) 365 final, July 26, 1995, http://aei.pitt.edu/3097/ [7.11.2015].
  • Kowalik-Bańczyk K. (2008), Pojęcie „wpływu na handel” jako kryterium stosowania przez sądy krajowe wspólnotowego prawa konkurencji (Concept ‘Impact on Trade’ as a criterion of applying by national courts of the Community Law of Competition), Przegląd Ustawodawstwa Gospodarczego, no. 2, pp. 24ff.
  • Lasok D. (1998), Overview of the European Union Law. Part 2. Business Law, Scientific Society of the Organisation and Leadership „House of the Organiser”, Toruń.
  • Marquardt P. (2007), Public Aid for small and medium traders, Lexis Nexis, Warszawa.
  • Nykiel-Mateo A. (2009), Public Aid and general measures of intervention in the European Community Law, House Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa.
  • The Guide (2008): Public Aid in the operational programmes 2007–2013. The Guide for public administration with commentaries to regulations of the Minister of Regional Development concerning provide public aid in the regional operational programmes, Ministry of Regional Development, Warszawa.
  • Postuła I., Werner A. (2006), Public Aid, Nexis Nexis, Warszawa.
  • Skowron M. (2007), Regulacja pomocy publicznej w Polsce po akcesji do Unii Europejskiej (Regulation of public aid in Poland after the accession to EU), Przegląd Ustawodawstwa Gospodarczego, no. 6, pp. 2ff.
  • Sobczak K. (ed.) (2002), European Business Law in an activity of enterprises, Difin, Warszawa.
  • Szczegółowy Opis Priorytetów Regionalnego Programu Operacyjnego dla Województwa Dolnośląskiego na lata 2007–2013 (Detailed Description of Priorities of Regional Operational Programme for Lower Silesia Province in 2007–2013), http://old.rpo.dolnyslask.pl/pliki/opis_priorytetow/URPO_19_12_07_czyste.pdf [7.11.2015].
  • Szydło M. (2006), Pomoc państwa na ratowanie i restrukturyzację przedsiębiorstw zagrożonych w prawie wspólnotowym (Public aid on saving and restructuring threatened enterprises in the Community Law), Przegląd Ustawodawstwa Gospodarczego, no. 2, pp. 2ff.
  • Wróbel A. (ed.) (2008), Treaty establishing the European Community. Commentary, Vol. I, Wolters Kluwer Polska, Warszawa.
  • Rozporządzenie Ministra Rozwoju Regionalnego z dnia 7 grudnia 2009 r. w sprawie udzielania pomocy na inwestycje w zakresie: energetyki, infrastruktury telekomunikacyjnej, infrastruktury sfery badawczo-rozwojowej, lecznictwa uzdrowiskowego w ramach regionalnych programów operacyjnych, Dz.U. nr 214, poz. 1661 (Regulation of the
  • Minister of Regional Development of December 7, 2009 on granting regional investment assistance as regards: power generation, telecommunication infrastructure, R&D infrastructure, and health-resort treatment under regional operational programmes (Dz.U. [Journal of Laws] No. 214, item 1661).
  • Rozporządzenie Ministra Rozwoju Regionalnego z dnia 15 grudnia 2010 r. w sprawie udzielania regionalnej pomocy inwestycyjnej w ramach regionalnych programów operacyjnych, Dz.U. nr 239, poz. 1599 (Regulation of the Minister of Regional Development of December 15, 2010 on granting regional investment assistance under regional operational programmes, Dz.U. [Journal of Laws] No. 239, item 1599).
  • Rozporządzenie Ministra Infrastruktury i Rozwoju z dnia 19 marca 2015 r. w sprawie udzielania pomocy de minimis w ramach regionalnych programów operacyjnych na lata 2014–2020, Dz.U. z 2015 r., poz. 488 (Regulation of the Minister of Infrastructure and Development dated 19th March 2015 on extending de minimis aid under 2014–2020 regional operational programmes, Dz.U. [Journal of Laws] of 2015, item 488).
  • Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, O.J. EU 2012 C 326, p. 1.
  • Ustawa z dnia 30 kwietnia 2004 r. o postępowaniu w sprawach dotyczących pomocy publicznej, t.j. Dz.U. z 2007 r., nr 59, poz. 404 z późn. zm. (Act of April 30, 2004 on Procedures to be Followed in Matters Concerning Public Aid (consolidated text: Dz.U. [Journal of Laws] of 2007, item 404, as amended).
  • Ustawa z dnia 16 lutego 2007 r. o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów, Dz.U. nr 50, poz. 331 z późn. zm. (Act of February 16, 2007 on Competition and Consumer Protection, Dz.U. [Journal of Laws] No. 59, item 404, as amended).
  • Commission Decision of October 13, 1999 in the case no. N 530/99 – Restoration of Santa Maria de Retuerta Monastery.
  • Commission Decision of December 21, 2000, in the case no. N 258/2000 concerning the aid for Leisure Pool Dorsten – Germany.
  • Commission Decision of January 21, 2003, in the case no. NN 136/A/2002 concerning the funds for l’Ecomusée d’Alsace – France.
  • Commission Decision of April 20, 2005, in the case no. N 106/2005 concerning aid for Hala Ludowa (Centennial Hall) in Wrocław.
  • Commission Decision of November 28, 2007, in the case no. N 377/2007 concerning aid for Bataviawerf – the Netherlands.
  • Commission Decision of April 30, 2008, in the case no. N 704/2007 concerning aid programme for a theatre production in the Basque Country.
  • Commission Decision of October 10, 2007, in the case no. NN 50/2007 concerning the Austria Indemnity Scheme for Federal Museums.
  • Judgement of the Regional Administration Court (WSA) in Bydgoszcz, dated June 15, 2011, case no. II SA/Bd 492/11.
  • Judgement of Regional Administration Court (WSA) in Wrocław, dated May 18, 2010, case no. III SA/Wr 40/10.
  • Judgement of Regional Administration Court (WSA) in Wrocław, dated October 13, 2011, case no. III SA/Wr 404/11.
  • Judgement of Regional Administration Court (WSA) in Wrocław, dated October 13, 2011, case no. III SA/Wr 701/10.
  • Judgement of Regional Administration Court (WSA) in Wrocław, dated October 21, 2010, case no. III SA/Wr 466/10.
  • Judgement of Regional Administrative Court (WSA) in Wrocław, dated February 2, 2011, case no. II SA/Bd 492/11.
  • Judgement of Regional Administration Court (WSA) in Wrocław, dated February 2, 2011, case no. III SA/Wr 664/10.
  • Judgment of ECJ of July 2, 1974 in the case 173/73 Italy v. Commission [1974] ECR 709.
  • Judgement of ECJ of September 17, 1980 in the case 730/79 Philip Morris, [1980] ECR p. 2671.
  • Judgement of ECJ of February 24, 1987 in the case No. 310/85 Deufil v. Commission, [1987] ECR p. 901.
  • Judgement of ECJ of July 13, 1988 in the case 102/87 France v. Commission, [1988] ECR p. 4067.
  • Judgement of the ECJ of July 11, 1996 in the case C-39/94 Syndicat français de l’Express international (SFEI) et autres v. La Poste at autres, [1996] ECR p. I-3547.
  • Judgement of ECJ of April 29, 1999 in the case C-342/96 Spain v. Commission, [1999] p. I-2459.
  • Judgement of TPICE of September 1, 1995 in the case T–471/93 Tierce Ladbroke SA v. Commission, [1995] ECR p. II-2537.
  • Opinion of A.G. Capotorti on the case no. 82/77, Openbar Ministerie v. Jacobus Philippus Van Tiggelle, [1978] ECR.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

ISSN
2353 - 9119

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-0eb875bd-bfa0-41b5-a76c-3ac8cca7bd76
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.