Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2014 | 3(33) | 102-113

Article title

Sources of knowledge conflicts in cognitive agent’s architecture in DSS

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
This paper presents the problem of knowledge conflicts identification in the architecture of cognitive agents. The agents operate at the decision support systems. The types and the sample of cognitive agents architecture was characterized in the first part of article. Next, the customer relationship management agent was described and the causes of knowledge conflicts were indicated. The final part of article contains the analysis of sources of knowledge conflicts and their examples related to decision-making process.

Year

Issue

Pages

102-113

Physical description

Contributors

References

  • Bytniewski A., Hernes M., 2013, Wykorzystanie agentów kognitywnych w budowie zintegrowanego systemu informatycznego zarządzania, [in:] Porębska-Miąc T., Sroka H. (eds.), Systemy wspomagania organizacji, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, Katowice.
  • Cognitive Computing Research Group, http://ccrg.cs.memphis.edu/ (29.01.2014).
  • Dastani M., Governatori G., Rotolo A., Van Der Torre L., 2005, Programming cognitive agents in defeasible logic, LPAR, Springer, pp. 621–636.
  • Dastani M., Van der Torre L., 2002, A classification of cognitive agents, [in:] Gray W.D., Schun C.D. (eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Cognitive Science Society, Mahwah.
  • De Long D., Seemann P., 2000, Confronting Conceptual Confusion and Conflict in Knowledge Management, Organizational Dynamics, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 33–44.
  • Duch W., 2010, Architektury kognitywne, czyli jak zbudować sztuczny umysł, [in:] Tadeusiewicz R. (ed.), Neurocybernetyka teoretyczna, Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa.
  • Franklin S., Patterson F. G., 2006, The LIDA architecture: Adding new modes of learning to an intelligent, autonomous, software agent, [in:] Proceedings of the International Conference on Integrated Design and Process Technology, Society for Design and Process Science. San Diego, CA.
  • Hawkins J., Blakeslee S., 2004, On Intelligence: How a New Understanding of the Brain Will Lead to the Creation of Truly Intelligent Machines, Times Books, New York.
  • Hecht-Nielsen R., 2007, Confabulation Theory: The Mechanism of Thought, Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Hensinger R., Thome M., Wright T., 2004, Cougaar: A Scalable, Distributed Multi-Agent Architecture, IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 2, pp.1910–1917, doi: 10.1109/ICSMC.2004.1399959.
  • Hernes M., Nguyen N.T., 2007, Deriving consensus for hierarchical incomplete ordered partitions and coverings, Journal of Universal Computer Science, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 317–328.
  • Hernes M., Sobieska-Karpińska J., 2013, A comparative analysis of conflicts resolving methods in multiagent decision support systems, [in:] Pańkowska M., Sroka H., Stanek S. (eds.), Cognition and Creativity Support Systems, Studia Ekonomiczne, Zeszyty Naukowe Wydziałowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, Katowice, pp. 23–32.
  • Khalil K.M., Abdel-Aziz M., Nazmy T.T., Salem A.M., 2013, Intelligent techniques for resolving conflicts of knowledge in multi-agent decision support systems, [in:] Sixth International Conference on Intelligence Computing and Information Systems, Cairo, Egypt, eprint arXiv:1401.4381 -.
  • Korczak J., Hernes M., Bac M., 2013, Risk avoiding strategy in multi-agent trading system, [in:] Ganzha M., Maciaszek L., Paprzycki M. (eds.), Proceedings of Federated Conference Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), Kraków, pp. 1131–1138.
  • Lorkiewicz W., 2006, An approach to resolving semantic conflicts of temporally-vague observations in artificial cognitive agent, [in:] Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, part III, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 1004–1011.
  • Mianowska B., Nguyen N.T., 2011, Using knowledge integration techniques for user profile adaptation method in document retrieval systems, Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence V, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • Nguyen NT., Katarzyniak R., 2006, Multi-agent systems, ontologies and conflict resolution, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 17, no. 3 (Special issue), pp. 189–190.
  • Sobieska-Karpińska J., Hernes M., 2012, Consensus determining algorithm in multiagent decision support system with taking into consideration improving agent’s knowledge, [in:] Ganzha M., Maciaszek L., Paprzycki M. (eds.), Proceedings of Federated Conference Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), Wrocław, pp. 1035–1040.
  • Sobieska-Karpińska J., Hernes M., 2013, The postulates of consensus determining in financial decision support systems, [in:] Ganzha M., Maciaszek L., Paprzycki M.(eds.), Proceedings of Federated Conference Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), Kraków, pp. 1165–1168.
  • Sobieska-Karpińska J., Hernes M., 2014, Identification of the knowledge conflict’s sources in the architecture of cognitive agents supporting decision support process, [in:] Ganzha M., Maciaszek L., Paprzycki M. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2014 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems. Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, vol. 2, Polskie Towarzystwo Informatyczne, Warsaw, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York City, pp. 1157–1162.
  • Tadeusiewicz R., 2013, Systemy kognitywne – nowy wymiar informatyki ekonomicznej, http://ryszardtadeusiewicz.natemat.pl/75001,systemy-kognitywne-nowy-wymiar-informatyki-ekonomicznej (29.12.2013).
  • Yager R., 2000, Approximate Reasoning and Conflict Resolution, Machine Intelligence Institute, Iona College, New Rochelle, NY.
  • Żytniewski M., Kowal R., Sołtysik A., 2013, The outcomes of the research in areas of application and impact of software agents societies to organizations so far. Examples of implementation in Polish companies, [in:] Ganzha M., Maciaszek L., Paprzycki M. (eds.), Proceedings of Federated Conference Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), Kraków, pp. 1165–1168.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-0f02e5f5-8929-45ce-88fc-e2e67e3c0d09
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.