DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS OF THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN ECONOMIES

• Authors: Oziewicz Ewa
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Southeast Asian economies have already gone a long way of development. Firstly, they have survived a period of economic miracle, which de facto was not a miracle, but based on good macroeconomic policy and strong foundations, such as high interest rate and macroeconomic stability. Secondly, the economies have experienced deep crisis, which has proven that good policies are not sufficient condition for development. Apart of them economy needs good, mature institutions and management. Reforming those institutions as well as political reforms is especially important, if countries open politically as well as their economies. Reforms with parallel process of transforming countries towards democracy, and sometimes still decentralization is a great challenge for them. Thirdly, dynamic development of the Chinese and Indian economies has constrained other countries and those being members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) as well, to certain adjustments. ASEAN countries represent different development levels, what significantly determines their future aims and policies as well as their advances in the world and region’s society. The article answers three important questions connected with further development of the ASEAN countries: 1. Are the ASEAN countries able to avoid internal disintegration while growing intolerance for deepening disparities in the societies of individual countries, increase in pollution and corruption? 2. Are the ASEAN countries going to profit on the success of China and India, or, maybe opposite, is it going to be additional competitive struggle in international markets? 3. Will the regional integration help in raising the economic effectiveness, or is it to cause external shocks in individual economies?

Keywords

EN

Southeast Asia; Economic Development; Regional Integration

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Gdański
• Journal: International Journal of Emerging and Transition Economies (IJETE)
• Year: 2010
• Volume: 3
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 1-11

Contributors

author

Oziewicz Ewa

References

• Akamatsu, K. (1962). A Historical Pattern of Economic Growth in Developing Countries. Journal of Developing Economies, 1(1), 3-25.
• ASEAN Statistics (2009). Retrieved September 24, 2009 from the World Wide Web: http://www.aseansec.org.
• ASEAN Trade and Investment Profile (2009). ASEAN Affairs. The Voice of Southeast Asia. Retrieved September 24, 2009 from the World Wide Web: http://www.aseanaffairs.com.
• Crispin, S.W. (2008, October 26). Companions in Crisis. Asia Times Online. Retrieved November 12, 2008 from the World Wide Web: http://www.atimes.com.
• Gill, I. & Kharas, H. (2006). An East Asian Renaissance: Ideas for Growth. Washington D.C.: World Bank.
• Khalid, N. (2008, April 9-10). Trade with the Neighbors. Growth and Trade Prospects for South East Asia, Singapore: Translog Asia 2008.
• Murphy, K. & Hessel, M. (2003). Stealing the State, and Everything Else. A Survey of Corruption in the Postcommunist World, Project Syndicate. Retrieved October 3, 2006 from the World Wide Web: http://www.project-syndicate.org.
• Sally, R. & Sen, R. (2005a). Revisiting Trade Policies in Southeast Asia.
• ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 22(1), 92-115.
• Sally, R. & Sen, R. (2005b). Whither Trade Policies in Southeast Asia? The
• Wider Asian and Global Context. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 22(1), 92– 115.
• Srivastava, S. & Rajan, R. (2004). What Does the Economic Rise of China Imply for ASEAN and India: Focus on Trade and Investment Flows. In:
• H. Kehal (Ed.), Foreign Investment in Developing Countries, Palgrave Macmillan.
• TI 2008 Corruption Perception Index. Transparency International (2008). Retrieved October 17, 2008 from the World Wide Web: www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2008.
• Trade and Development Report 2005 (2005). New York and Geneva: UNCTAD.
• World Investment Report 2009 (2009). NewYork & Geneva: UNCTAD.
• World Trade Report 2005 (2006). Geneva: WTO.
• World Trade Report 2007 (2008). Geneva: WTO.