PL EN


2015 | 11 | 51-59
Article title

Political Parties’ Electoral Strategies in the Context of Political Uncertainty

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Taking part in an election, political parties implement their planned strategic activities, which involve making choices regarding competitive goals and maximizing the usefulness of the resources they have. A significant context of party strategies is political uncertainty. The paper discusses the importance of political uncertainty in three areas. First, political uncertainty is an instrument affecting the character of political competition. In the second area, the article presents its role as a factor of competition in the process of campaigning for votes. It also points out that political uncertainty may be a mechanism of institutionalizing new political parties. Some of the implemented party strategies, influencing the level of political uncertainty, assume possible electoral manipulations.
Contributors
  • University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
References
  • Colomer J.M. (2004), The Strategy and History of Electoral System Choice, [in:] J.M. Colomer (ed.), Handbook of Electoral System Choice, Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
  • Fowler J.H., Smirnov O. (2007), Mandates, Parties, and Voters: how Elections Shape the Future, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Heilpern S. (1998), Dynamika i niepewność w modelowaniu ekonomicznym, Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej im. Oskara Langego.
  • Laver M, Policy and the Dynamics of Political Competition, “American Political Science Review” Vol. 99(2)/ 2005, pp. 267–274.
  • Newman B. (1994), The Marketing of the President: Political Marketing as Campaign Strategy, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Schedler A. (2013), The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Schmitter P. (2001), Parties Are Not What They Once Were, [in:] L. Diamond, R. Gunther (ed.), Political Parties and Democracy, Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press.
  • Skrzypiński D (2002), Strategie partii politycznych,[in:] A. W. Jabłoński, L. Sobkowiak (red.), Marketing polityczny w teorii i praktyce, Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
  • Turska-Kawa A. (2013), Reactive political leadership, “Political Preferences”, 4/2013.
  • Turska-Kawa A. (2015), Determinanty chwiejności wyborczej, Katowice; Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
  • Westholm A. (1997), Distance versus Direction: The Illusory Defeat of the Proximity Theory of Electoral Choice, „American Political Science Review” Vol. 91/ 1997.
  • Wiszniowski R. (2000), Marketing wyborczy. Studium kampanii wyborczych w systemach prezydenckich i semiprezydenckich (Finlandia, Francja, Polska, Stany Zjednoczone), Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Wiszniowski R. (2008), Europejska przestrzeń polityczna: zachowania elektoratu w wyborach do Parlamentu Europejskiego, Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
  • Wojtasik W. (2015), Electoral manipulations, „Roczniki Nauk Społecznych” 9(45)/2015.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-0f5f6ba1-c670-436a-bba7-0492f7162ca7
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.