The Stylistic Category of Clarity (Σαφήνεια, Explanatio, Perspicuitas, Claritas) in the Eyes of Greek and Roman Writers

• Authors: Styka Jerzy
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The concept of clarity and the closely related idea of colour were of great importance not only for the formulation of classical ideas connected with the theory of beaux arts, but also for the creation of concepts related to the an­cient academic and philosophical discourse, mainly via the use of light/shadow/colour metaphors to express and envisage the problems discussed. These were of special importance for what is commonly referred to as ancient literary aesthet­ics, which is the product of ideas originating in classical philosophical literary theory, practice and critique. It is to this very area of aesthetic and literary mean­ings of clarity that I would like to devote the present paper. However, the bulk of preserved testimonies, both direct (i.e. directly and normatively formulated) and indirect (i.e. resulting from the immanent poetics of the work), as well as the fact that they are multi-layered, compel me to narrow my analysis to the concept of clarity (σαφήνεια, claritas) as a stylistic category in ancient rhetoric and poetics, based exclusively on concepts expressed by classical Greek and Latin authors.

Keywords

EN

clarity; perspicuity; stylistic category; literary aesthetics; ancient poetics; artistic style; stylistic decorum; ancient rhetoric

• Publisher: Księgarnia Akademicka
• Journal: Classica Cracoviensia
• Year: 2017
• Issue: 20
• Pages: 119-139

Contributors

author

Styka Jerzy

References

• Bell A., Swenson-Wright J., Tybjerg K. (ed.), 2008, Evidence, Cambridge Univer­sity Press.
• Boys-Stones G. R. (ed.), 2003, Metaphor, Allegory and the Classical Tradi­tion. Ancient Thought and Modern Revision, Oxford, [online:] http://dx.doi. org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199240050.001.0001.
• Calboli G., 2007, ‘The Metaphor after Aristotle’, [in:] Influences on Peripatetic Rhetoric: Essays in Honour of William W. Fortenbaugh, D. C. Mirhady (ed.), Leiden, pp. 123–150.
• Diels H., 1934, Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Vol. I, 5ed., Berlin.
• Fletcher A., 1970, Allegory. The Theory of the Symbolic Mode, Cornell University Press.
• Gorzkowski A., 2001, ‘‘Ut pictura verba’: zagadnienie unaocznienia w retoryce starożytnej i wczesnonowożytnej’, Pamiętnik Literacki 92/2, pp. 37–59.
• Lakoff G., Johnson M., 1988, Metafory w naszym życiu, transl. T. P. Krzeszowski, Warszawa.
• Lausberg H., 2002, Retoryka literacka. Podstawy wiedzy o literaturze, transl., ed. and introd. A. Gorzkowski, Bydgoszcz.
• O’Callaghan J., SJ, 1960, Las tres categorías estéticas de la cultura clásica. Armo­nía, claridad, grandeza, Madrid.
• Psaty B. M., 1978, ‘Cicero’s Literal Metaphor and Propriety’, [in:] Central States Speech Journal 29, pp. 107–117, [online:] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 10510977809367964.
• Silk M., 1969, Die aristotelische Theorie der Metapher; ein Versuch ihrer Rekon­struktion, München.
• Stroux J., 1912, De Theophrasti dicendi virtutibus, Leipzig.
• Styka J., 1997, Estetyka stosowności (decorum) w literaturze rzymskiej, Kraków.
• Styka J., 1998, ‘‘Convenientia partium’: Kategoria harmonii i symetrii w antycznej estetyce literackiej (‘Convenientia partium’: Harmony and Symmetry in An­cient Literary Aesthetics)’, [in:] Prace Komisji Filologii Klasycznej PAU 27, R. Turasiewicz (ed.), Kraków, pp. 29–53.
• Styka J., 2008, ‘Sydoniusz Apollinaris i kultura literacka w Galii V wieku’, Kraków.
• Tatarkiewicz W., 1976, Dzieje sześciu pojęć, Warszawa.
• Vatri A., 2017, Orality and Performance in Classical Attic Prose. A Linguistic Approach, Oxford University Press, [online:] http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ acprof:oso/9780198795902.001.0001.
• Webb R., 2009, Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical The­ory and Practice, Ashgate Publishing Company Farnham.
• Wood M. S., 2015, Aristotle and the Question of Metaphor, Ottawa, [online:] http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-4757.
• Zanker G., 1981, ‘Enargeia in the Ancient Criticism of Poetry’, Rheinisches Mu­seum für Philologie, Neue Folge 124/3/4, pp. 297–311.

Identifiers

DOI

https://doi.org/10.12797/CC.20.2017.20.07