Dyrektywa Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) 2016/681 w sprawie wykorzystywania danych dotyczących przelotu pasażera – adekwatny środek do walki z terroryzmem i poważnymi przestępstwami czy forma masowej inwigilacji?

• Authors: Wojnowska-Radzińska Julia

Title variants

EN

Directive (EU) 2016/681 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Use of Passenger Name Record (PNR) Data – An Adequate Mean to Fight with Terrorism and Serious Crime or a Mass Surveillance Tool?

• Languages of publication: PL EN

Abstracts

EN

On 28 April 2016 the Directive (EU) 2016/681 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the use of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime was adopted by the 28 Member States. Regulating this complex issue, European legislator has been obliged to strike a “fair balance” between the objective of combating terrorism and serious crime and the objective of protecting personal data and respecting the private life of the passengers. The aim of this paper is to analyse the provisions which apply to the processing of PNR data in the light of the principle of proportionality.

Keywords

EN

Fundamental Rights,; Principle of Proportionality,; Public Security; Law,; Eurropean Union.

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Centrum Europejskie
• Journal: Studia Europejskie-Studies in European Affairs
• Year: 2017
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 163-183

Contributors

author

Wojnowska-Radzińska Julia

• Uniwersytet im. A. Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

References

• Blasi Casagran C., The Future EU PNR System: Will Passenger Data be Protected?, “European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice”, No. 3/2015.
• De Hert P., Papakonstantinou V., Repeating the Mistakes of the Past Will Do Little Good for Air Passengers in the EU: The Comeback of the EU PNR Directive and a Lawyer’s Duty to Regulate Profi ling, “New Journal of European Criminal Law”, No. 2/2015.
• Granger M, Irion K., The Court of Justice and the Data Retention Directive in Digital Rights Ireland: Telling Off the EU Legislator and Teaching a Lesson in Privacy and Data Protection, “European Law Review”, No. 6/2014,
• Kaunert C., Leonard S., McKenzie A., The social construction of an EU interest in counter-terrorism: US influence and internal struggles in the cases of PNR and SWIFT, “European Security”, No. 4/2012.
• Lowe D., The European Union’s Passenger Name Record Data Directive 2016/681: Is it Fit for Purpose?, “International Criminal Law Review”, No. 1/2017.
• Rizer A., Dog Fight: Did The International Battle Over Airline Passenger Name Records Enable The Christmas-day Bomber?, “Catholic University Law Review”, No. 1/2010.
• Van Wasshnova M.R., Data Protection Confl icts Between the United States and the European Union in the War on Terror: Lessons Learned from the Existing System Of Financial Information Exchange, “Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law”, No. 3/2007.
• Vavoula V., ‘I Travel, therefore I Am a Suspect’: an overview of the EU PNR Directive, 26.10.2016 r., http://eumigrationlawblog.eu/i-travel-therefore-iam- a-suspect-an-overview-of-the-eu-pnr-directive/ (dostęp 6.06.2017).