„Podwójna gra”. O przydatności koncepcji NOMA w socjologii religii

• Authors: Maria Rogińska

Title variants

EN

„The double game”. On suitability of the NOMA concept in sociology of religion

• Languages of publication: PL EN

Abstracts

PL

Artykuł jest poświęcony poznawczej sytuacji wierzącego badacza religii, którego przynależność zarówno do świata nauki, jak i do świata wiary, Peter Berger nazywa podwójnym obywatelstwem, zaś Pierre Bourdieu podwójną grą. Autor zastanawia się, czy do sytuacji tej można zastosować koncepcję rozłącznych obszarów dociekań (ang. non-overlaping magisteria, NOMA), która powstała jako model współistnienia religii i nauk przyrodniczych.

EN

The objective of this paper is to analyze the situation of a believing sociologist of religion. It is her affiliation to the both scientific and religious world that Peter Berger calls “the dual citizenship” and Pierre Bourdieu – “the double game”. The author investigates whether the non-overlaping magisteria (NOMA) concept proposed by Stephen Gould as a model of coexistence of religion and natural sciences can be applied to the situation of the social researcher of religion.

Keywords

PL

religijność; nauka; socjologia religii; NOMA; metodologiczny ateizm

EN

religiosity; science; sociology of religion; NOMA; methodological atheism

• Publisher: Science Studies Committee, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 50
• Issue: 2(200)
• Pages: 89-103

Contributors

author

Maria Rogińska

• Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii, Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. KEN w Krakowie

References

• Adamski F. (red.), 1983, Socjologia religii. Wybór tekstów, Kraków: WAM.
• Benton J., 1977, Sociological Theory and Religious Truth, „Sociological Analysis” 38: 368–388.
• Berger P. L., 1997, Święty baldachim. Elementy socjologicznej teorii religii, tłum. W. Kurdziel, Kraków: NOMOS.
• Berger P. L., 2001, Reflections on the sociology of religion today, „Sociology of Religion”, 62: 443–445.
• Berger P. L., Kellener H., 1981, Sociology Reinterpreted: An Essay on Method and Vocation, New York: Anchor Books.
• Bhaskar R., 1997, A realist theory of science, London: Verso.
• Bhaskar R., 1998, The possibility of naturalism: a philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences, New York: Routledge.
• Bourdieu Pierre, 1971, Genèse et structure du champ religieux, „Revue française de sociologie” XII: 295–334.
• Bronk Andrzej, 1996, Nauka wobec religii. Teoretyczne podstawy nauk o religii, Lublin: KUL.
• Bruner J. S, 1986, Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Bruner J. S., 1990, Acts of Meaning, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Capps W. H., 1995, Religious Studies: The Making of a Discipline, Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
• Cavanaugh M. A., 1982, Pagan and Christian: Sociological Euhemerism Versus American Sociology of Religion. „Sociological Analysis” 43: 109–130.
• Dawkins R., 2007, Bóg urojony, tłum. P. J. Szwajcer, Warszawa: CiS.
• Ecklund E. H., 2010, Science vs. Religion. What Scientists Really Think, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Evans J. H., Evans M. S., 2008, Religion and Science: Beyond the Epistemological Conflict Narrative, „Annual Review of Sociology” 34: 87–105.
• Friedrichs R. W., 1974, Social Research and Theology: End of the Detente? „Review of Religious Research” 15: 113–127.
• Garrett W. R., 1974, Troublesome Transcendence: The Supernatural in the Scientific Study of Religion, „Sociological Analysis” 35: 167–180.
• Gates G., 2012, Letter to the editors and advisory editors of Social Science Research, „Social Science Research” 41: 1350–1351.
• Gould S. J., 1998, Non-overlapping magisteria. In Leonardo’s mountain of clams and the diet of worms, New York: Harmony Books.
• Gould S. J., 1999, Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life, New York: Ballantine Books.
• Gould S. J., 2002, Skały wieków. Nauka i religia w pełni życia, tłum. Jacek Bieroń, Poznań: Zysk i S-ka.
• Heddendorf R., 1977, Some Presuppositions of a Christian Sociology, „Sociological Analysis” 38: 368–388.
• Kennan W., 2002, Post-Secular Sociology: Effusions of Religion in Late Modern Settings, „European Journal of Social Theory” 5: 279–290.
• Lehman J., Shriver W., 1968, Academic discipline as predictive of faculty religiosity, „Social Forces” 47: 171–182.
• Leuba J. H., 1916, The Belief in God and Immortality: A Psychological, Anthropological and Statistical Study, Boston: Sherman, French & Co.
• Leuba J. H., 1934, Religious Beliefs of American Scientists, „Harper’s Magazine” 169: 291–300.
• Libiszowska- Żółtkowska M., 2000, Wiara uczonych, Kraków: NOMOS.
• Pigliucci M., 2000, Personal Gods, Deism, and the Limits of Skepticism, „Skeptic” 8: 41–42.
• Minois G., 1995, Kościół i nauka: dzieje pewnego niezrozumienia. Od Augustyna do Galileusza, tłum. A. Szymanowski, Warszawa: Volumen.
• Mixon S. L., Lyon L., Beaty M. D., 2002, Making Sense of a „Religious” University: Faculty Adaptations and Opinions at Brigham Young, Baylor, Notre Dame, and Boston College, „Review of Religious Research” 43: 326–348.
• Moore G. E., 1903, Principia Ethica, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Moritz J. M., 2009, Rendering unto Science and God: Is NOMA Enough? „Theology and Science” 7: 363–378.
• Peet C., 2005, Defining Religion: Strategies and Reflections on an Elusive Figure, „Journal of Psychology and Christianity” 24: 105–112.
• Piwowarski W., 1996, Socjologia religii, Lublin: KUL.
• Porpora D. V., 2006, Methodological Atheism, Methodological Agnosticism and Religious Experience, „Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour” 36: 57–75.
• Preus S., 1987, Explaining Religion: Criticism and Theory from Bodin to Freud, New Haven: Yale University Press.
• Regnerus M., 2012, How different are the adult children of parents who have same-sex relationships? Findings from the New Family Structures Study, „Social Science Research” 41: 752–770.
• Rey T., 2007, Bourdieu on Religion: Imposing Faith and Legitimacy, London: Equinox Publishing.
• Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences, 1999, wydanie 2., Washington: National Academies Press.
• Seiwert H., 2012, The Study of Religion as a Scientific Discipline: A Comment on Luther Martin and Donald Wiebe’s Paper, „Religio” XX: 27–38.
• Simmel G., 1989, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
• Smith C., 2003, Moral, Believing Animals: Human Personhood and Culture, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Smith C., 2011, „More Realism, Critically” – A Reply to James K.A. Smith’s „The (Re)Turn to the Person in Contemporary Theory”, „Christan Scholar’s Review”, 40, 205–216.
• Stark R., Iannaccone L., Finke R., 1998, Rationality and the „Religious Mind”, “Economic Inquiry” XXXVI: 373–389.
• Stark R., 1963, On the Incompatibility of Religion and Science: A Survey of American Graduate Students, „Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion” 3: 3–20.
• Swatos W. H., Kivisto P., 1991, Max Weber as „Christian Sociologist”, „Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion”, 30: 347–362.
• Taves A., 2011, 2010. Presidential Address: „Religion” in the Humanities and the Humanities in the University, „Journal of the American Academy of Religion” 79: 287–314.
• Teske J. A., 2010, Narrative and meaning in science and religion, „Zygon” 45: 91–104.
• Thalheimer F., Religiosity and Secularization in the Academic Professions, „Sociology of Education” 46: 183–202.
• Vandenberghe F., 2010, Immanent transcendence in Georg Simmel’s sociology of religion, „Journal of Classical Sociology February” 10: 5-32.
• Weber M., 1966, Sociology and Religion, London: Methuen.
• Wiebe D., Martin L. H., 2012, Religious Studies as a Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion, „Journal of the American Academy of Religion”, 80: 587–597.
• Wiebe D., 1984, Beyond the Sceptic and the Devotee: Reductionism in the Scientific Study of Religion, „Journal of the American Academy of Religion” 52: 157–165.
• Wuthnow R., 1989, The Struggle for America’s Soul: Evangelicals, Liberals and Secularism, Grand Rapids: W.B. Eerdmans.