‘I Don’t Want This Town to Change’: Resistance, Bifocality and the Infra-Politics of Social Remittances

• Authors: Garapich Michał P.
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The process of social remitting is complex and multilayered, and involves numerous social actors that at each stage face several choices. By definition, the process of socially remitting ideas, codes of behaviour and practices starts with the migrants themselves and their social context in the destination country. This paper focuses on the as yet unexplored issue of resistance performed and articulated by migrants confronted with potential change influenced by social remittances and the generalised process of diffusion. Faithful to the understanding of social remittances as ultimately a process where individual agency is the crucial determinant, the article follows the ideas, practices and values travelling across the transnational social field between Britain and various localities in Poland. Resistance to change and new ways of doing things is a continuous dialogical process within one culture’s power field, which is understood here in anthropological terms as a porous, open-ended field of competing meanings and discourses. Notions of bifocality, infra-politics of power relations and resistance are an important aspect of remittances and their reinterpretations, and resistance to social remittances by migrants, both in their destinations and in their communities of origin, is a crucial component of the whole process without which our understanding of remittances is incomplete.

Keywords

EN

social remittances; resistance; Polish migration; agency; change

• Publisher: Ośrodek Badań nad Migracjami Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego oraz Polska Akademia Nauk
• Journal: Central and Eastern European Migration Review
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 5
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 155-166

Contributors

author

Garapich Michał P.

References

• Anderson B. (2013). Us and Them? The Dangerous Politics of Immigration Controls. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Basch L., Glick Schiller N., Szanton Blanc C. (1994). Nations Unbound: Transnational Projects, Postcolonial Predicaments, and Deterritorialized Nation-States. Langhorne, PA: Gordon & Breach.
• Boccagni P., Decimo F. (2013). Mapping Social Remittances. Editorial. Migration Letters 10(1): 1–10.
• Castles S., Davidson A. (2000). Citizenship and Migration: Globalisation and the Politics of Belonging. London: Routledge.
• Cohen A. P. (1994). Self Consciousness. An Alternative Anthropology of Identity. London: Routledge.
• de Certeau M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Foucault M. (1978). The History of Sexuality. New York: Random House.
• Gallo E. (2015). The Irony of Kinship Migration and the Control of Emotions Among Malayalis. Emotion, Space and Society 16: 108–115.
• Gardner K. (1993). Desh–Bidesh: Sylheti Images of Home and Away. Man 28(1): 1–15.
• Gill N. (2010). Pathologies of Migrant Place-Making: The Case of Polish Migrants to the UK. Environment and Planning A 42(5): 1157–1173.
• Glick Schiller N., Çağlar A., Guldbrandsen T. C. (2006). Beyond the Ethnic Lens: Locality, Globality, and Born-Again Incorporation. American Ethnologist 33(4): 612–633.
• Golbert R. (2001). Transnational Orientations from Home: Constructions of Israel and Transnational Space Among Ukrainian Jewish Youth. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 27(4): 713–731.
• Guarnizo L. E. (1997). The Emergence of a Transnational Social Formation and the Mirage of Return Migration Among Dominican Transmigrants. Identities 4(2): 281–322.
• Gupta A., Ferguson J. (1997). Culture, Power, Place. Ethnography at the End of an Era, in: A. Gupta, J. Ferguson (eds), Culture, Power, Place, Explorations in Critical Anthropology, pp. 1–29. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
• Ireland P. (1994). The Policy Challenge of Ethnic Diversity. Immigrant Politics in France and Switzerland. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
• Levitt P. (1998). Social Remitances: Migration-Driven Local-Level Forms of Cultural Diffusion. International Migration Review 32(4): 926–948.
• Levitt P., Lamba-Nieves D. (2011). Social Remittance Revisited. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 32(1): 1–22.
• Miller D. (2008). The Comfort of Things. Cambridge: Polity.
• Scott J. C. (1990). Domination and the Art of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Heaven, London: Yale University Press.
• Smith M. P. (1994). Can You Imagine? Transnational Migration and the Globalization of Grassroots Politics. Social Text 39(1): 15–33.
• Smith M. P. (2001). Transnational Urbanism: Locating Globalization. Oxford, UK, Malden, MA: Blackwell.
• Turner V. (1980). Social Dramas and Stories About Them. Critical Inquiry 7(1): 141–168.
• Vertovec S. (2004). Migrant Transnationalism and Modes of Transformation. International Migration Review 38(3): 970–1001.
• Vertovec S. (2007). New Complexities of Cohesion in Britain: Superdiversity, Transnationalism and Civil-Integration. Oxford: University of Oxford, COMPAS.
• Weber D. (1995). From Limen to Border: A Meditation on the Legacy of Victor Turner for American Cultural Studies. American Quarterly 47(3): 525–536.
• White A. (2011). The Mobility of Polish Families in the West of England. Translocalism and Attitudes to Return. Studia Migracyjne – Przegląd Polonijny 37(1): 11–32.
• Zubrzycki G. (2006). The Crosses of Auschwitz: Nationalism and Religion in Post-Communist Poland. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.