Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2018 | 11(17) | 29-52

Article title

Consumer Welfare in Financial Services: A View from EU Competition Law

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

The paper analyses to what extent financial consumer protection forms part of the competition law objective of consumer welfare that EU competition law nowadays adheres to. It argues that while EU consumer law more generally aims at protecting the final consumer, EU financial consumer protection instruments often protect a broader spectrum of customers. This wider notion of the consumer can also be found in EU competition law, where the consumer is usually likened to any customer. A notable difference between EU financial consumer protection and EU competition law, however, is that they place a different emphasis on structural goals and inherently individual components. In EU competition law, the structural protection of competition is thought to eventually protect consumers. By uniting individual and structural aspects of consumer welfare, as well as by combining reactive and proactive consumer protection, EU competition law and EU financial consumer protection law can together achieve a financial protection of consumers that naturally goes beyond what each area of the law could achieve alone. A stringent approach, however, would require the development of a comprehensive EU financial consumer law which includes both dimensions.
FR
L’article analyse dans quelle mesure la protection financière des consommateurs fait partie de l’objectif du bien-être des consommateurs en matière de droit de la concurrence, auquel le droit européen de la concurrence adhère actuellement. Il soutient que le droit de la consommation de l’UE vise généralement à protéger le consommateur final, mais les instruments de protection financière des consommateurs de l’UE protègent souvent un plus large éventail de clients. Cette notion plus large du consommateur se retrouve également dans le droit européen de la concurrence, où le consommateur est généralement assimilé à un client. Une différence notable entre la protection financière des consommateurs de l’UE et le droit de la concurrence de l’UE est l’accord d’une importance différente aux objectifs structurels et aux composantes intrinsèquement individuelles. Dans le droit de la concurrence de l’UE, la protection structurelle de la concurrence est considérée de protéger éventuellement des consommateurs. En unissant les aspects individuels et structurels du bien-être des consommateurs et en combinant une protection réactive et proactive des consommateurs, le droit de la concurrence de l’UE et le droit de la protection financière des consommateurs de l’UE peuvent ensemble assurer le niveau de la protection financière des consommateurs allant au-delà de ce que chaque domaine juridique pourrait atteindre toute seule. Une approche stricte nécessiterait toutefois l’élaboration de droit européenne de la consommation dans le secteur financière complète, qui engloberait les deux dimensions

Year

Volume

Pages

29-52

Physical description

Dates

published
2018-08-30

Contributors

  • , Institute of Corporate and International Commercial Law, University of Graz

References

  • Ahlborn, C. and Grave, C. (2006). Walter Eucken and Ordoliberalism: An Introduction from a Consumer Welfare Perspective. Competition Policy International, 2, 197–217.
  • Akman, P. (2009a). ‘Consumer Welfare’ and Article 82 EC: Practice and Rhetoric. World Competition: Law & Economics Review, 32, 71–90.
  • Akman, P. (2009b). Searching for the Long-Lost Soul of Article 82 EC. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 267–303.
  • Akman, P. (2010). ‘Consumer’ versus ‘Customer’: The Devil in the Detail. Journal of Law and Society, 37(2), 315–344.
  • Albors-Llorens, A. and Jones, A. (2016). The Images of the ‘Consumer’ in EU Competition Law. In D. Leczykiewicz and S. Weatherill (eds), The Images of the Consumer in EU Law: Legislation, Free Movement and Competition Law.Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.
  • Andriychuk, O. (2015). Rediscovering the Spirit of Competition: On the Normative Value of the Competitive Process. European Competition Journal, 6, 575–610.
  • Averitt, N.W. and Lande, R.H. (1997). Consumer Sovereignty: A Unified Theory of Antitrust and Consumer Protection Law. Antitrust Law Journal, 65, 713–756
  • Averitt, N.W. and Lande, R.H. (2007). Using the ‘Consumer Choice’ Approach to Antitrust Law. Antitrust Law Journal, 74, 175–264.
  • Banasevic, N., Ryan, S. and Wezenbeek, R. (2014). Financial Services. In J. Faull and A.Nikpay (eds), The EU Law of Competition(3rd edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Blair, R.D. and Sokol D.D. (2013). Welfare Standards in U.S. and E.U. Antitrust Enforcement. Fordham Law Review, 81, 2497–2541.
  • Bork, R.H. (1978). The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself.New York: Basic Books.
  • Buttigieg, E. (2009). Competition Law: Safeguarding the Consumer Interest. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
  • Colaert, V. and van Dyck, T. (2010). Financial Services. In H.-W. Micklitz, J. Stuyck and E. Terryn (eds), Cases, Materials and Text on Consumer Law.Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  • Cseres, K.J. (2005). Competition Law and Consumer Protection.Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
  • Daskalova, V. (2015). Consumer Welfare in EU Competition Law: What Is It (Not) About? Competition Law Review,11, 133–162.
  • Decker, C. (2017). Concepts of the Consumer in Competition, Regulatory, and Consumer Protection Policies. Journal of Competition Law & Economics,13, 151–184.
  • European Commission (n.d.). Regulating Credit Rating Agencies, https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/banking-and-finance/financial-supervision-and-risk-management/managing-risks-banks-and-financial-institutions/regulating-credit-rating-agencies_en (accessed 1 June 2018).
  • European Commission (2012a). Financial Services – Cases, http://ec.europa.eu/competition/sectors/financial_services/cases.html (accessed 1 June 2018).
  • European Commission (2012b). Sector Inquiries, http://ec.europa.eu/competition/sectors/financial_services/inquiries/index.html (accessed 1 June 2018).
  • European Commission (2016). Financial Services – Overview, http://ec.europa.eu/competition/sectors/financial_services/overview_en.html (accessed 1 June 2018).
  • European Commission (2018). Merger Statistics(30 April 2018). Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/statistics.pdf (accessed 1 June 2018).
  • Evans, P. (2007). Assessing Consumer Detriment. European Competition Law Review, 28, 26–35.
  • Faull, J. and others (2014). Article 101. In J. Faull and A. Nikpay (eds), The EU Law of Competition(3rd edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • First, H. (2009). No Single Monopoly Profit, No Single Policy Prescription? Competition Policy International, 5, 199–207.
  • Gerber, D.J. (1994). Constitutionalizing the Economy: German Neo-liberalism, Competition Law and the New Europe. American Journal of Comparative Law, 42, 25–84.
  • Gerber, D.J. (2001). Law and Competition in Twentieth-Century Europe: Protecting Prometheus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ioannidou, M. (2015). Consumer Involvement in Private EU Competition Law Enforcement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kroes, N. (2005). European Competition Policy – Delivering Better Markets and Better Choices (London, 15 September 2005), SPEECH/05/512, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-05-512_en.htm (accessed 1 June 2018).
  • Lista, A. (2013). EU Competition Law and the Financial Services Sector. Abingdon: Informa Law.
  • Loos, M.B.M. (2008). Review of the European Consumer Acquis.Munich: Sellier.
  • OECD (2008). The Interface between Competition and Consumer Policies. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/40898016.pdf (accessed 1 June 2018).
  • OECD (2011). G20 High-level Principles on Financial Consumer Protection. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/g20/topics/financial-sector-reform/48892010.pdf (accessed 1 June 2018).
  • OECD (2014). Role of Competition in Financial Consumer Protection. DAF/COMP(2014)6. Retrieved from: https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP(2014)6/en/pdf (accessed 1 June 2018).
  • Orbach, B.Y. (2011). The Antitrust Consumer Welfare Paradox. Journal of Competition Law and Economics 7, 133–164.
  • Reich, N. and Micklitz, H.-W. (2014). Economic Law, Consumer Interests, and EU Integration. In N. Reich and others (eds), European Consumer Law (2nd edn). Cambridge: Intersentia.
  • Robertson, V.H.S.E. (forthcoming). Market Definition between Law and Economics: Spectrum or Prism.
  • UNCTAD (n.d.). Financial Consumer Protection in the Banking Sector: A Comparative and Empirical Approach, http://unctad.org/en/Pages/DITC/CompetitionLaw/ResearchPartnership/Financial-Consumer-Protection.aspx (accessed 1 June 2018).
  • Van Miert. K. (1993). A Pragmatic Approach to Europe’s Competition Policy. Frontier-Free Europe 5.
  • Vestager, M. (2016). Statement by Commissioner Vestager on Decision to Fine Crédit Agricole, HSBC and JPMorgan Chase € 485 Million for Euro Interest Rate Derivatives Cartel (7 December 2016), STATEMENT/16/4307, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_STATEMENT-16-4307_en.htm (accessed 1 June 2018).
  • Vestager, M. (2017). Making Globalisation Work for Europeans (Leuven, 23 November 2017), https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2014-2019/vestager/announcements/making-globalisation-work-europeans_en (accessed 1 June 2018).
  • Weitbrecht, A. (2008). From Freiburg to Chicago and Beyond – the First 50 Years of European Competition Law. European Competition Law Review, 29, 81–88.
  • Whish, R. and Bailey, D. (2018). Competition Law (9th edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Wright, J.D. (2012). The Antitrust/Consumer Protection Paradox: Two Policies at War with Each Other. Yale Law Journal, 121, 2216–2268

Document Type

Publication order reference

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-1333c543-9ff2-4b31-809d-11a0a1b3dbd4
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.