Des Linguisten Einführung zu menschlicher Fehlbarkeit und kognitiven Verzerrungen: deren Evolution, kognitiver Stellenwert und Einfluss auf die Entscheidungsfindung

• Authors: Breyl Michael

Title variants

EN

The Linguist’s Guide to Human Fallibility and Biases: their Evolution, Cognitive Significance and Impact in Decision Making

• Languages of publication: DE

Abstracts

EN

Most people, including many scientists, readily assume that human perception depicts reality truthfully, that human thought processes are essentially rational, and that episodic memory aptly stores and recalls factual information about personal experiences. However, these notions are only partially true. Of course, evolutionary pressures have culminated in an overall quite powerful cognitive system that allows humans to adequately cope with the circumstances present within their ecological niche(s), but nevertheless, perception of the outside world is subject to the brain’s “motivated” interpretation out of imperfect input, thinking is guided by heuristic shortcuts as well as a plethora of unconscious biases, and memory shows itself to be imperfect as well as malleable to a variety of influences. As a result, intuitive judgments on reality are, in principle, to a certain degree unreliable. Cognitive shortcomings constitute an intrinsic condition of human nature and profoundly impact how people interpret the world and interact with their material and social surroundings. This paper is motivated by the fact that many scholars within linguistics, as well as most students of the field, have little to no awareness of the pertinent literature, even though these biases may directly or indirectly influence their work. The following therefore aims to present a concise introduction to the topic, from the evolutionary background to practical implications within linguistic research.

Keywords

EN

perception; cognitive biases; linguistic theory; linguistic methodology

• Publisher: Oficyna Wydawnicza ATUT – Wrocławskie Wydawnictwo Oświatowe
• Journal: Linguistische Treffen in Wrocław
• Year: 2023
• Issue: 23
• Pages: 17-37

Dates

published

2023-07-09

Contributors

author

Breyl Michael

• Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg

References

• Ambridge, Ben and Elena V. M. Lieven. Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Print.
• Arbib, Michael A. How the brain got language: The mirror system hypothesis. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012. Print.
• Arkes, Hal R. “Costs and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debiasing”. Psychological Bulletin 110 (1991): 486–498. Print.
• Bompas, Aline, Grace Kendall and Petroc Sumner. “Spotting fruit versus picking fruit as the selective advantage of human color vision”. i-Perception 4 (2013): 84–94. Print.
• Breyl, Michael. “Reconsidering linguistic nativism from an interdisciplinary, emergentist perspective”. Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 5 (2023). In print.
• Breyl, Michael. Forschungsfeld Sprachevolution: Methodik, Theorie und Empirie der modernen Sprachursprungsforschung. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter, 2021. Print.
• Breyl, Michael. “Triangulating Neanderthal cognition: A tale of not seeing the forest for the tress”. WIRES Cognitive Science 12 (2021): Article e1545. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1545. 27.1.2023.
• Bunford, Nóra, Raúl Hernández-Pérez, Eszter Borbála Farkas, Laura V. Cuaya, Dóra Szabó, Ádám György Szabo, Márta Gácsi, Ádám Miclósi and Attila Andics. “Comparative brain imaging reveals analogous and divergent patterns of species- and face-sensitivity in humans and dogs”. Journal of Neuroscience 40 (2020): 8396–8408. Print.
• Castel, Alan D., Michael Vendetti and Keith J. Holyoak. “Fire drill: Inattentional blindness and amnesia for the location of fire extinguishers”. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 74 (2012): 1391–1396. Print.
• Čavojová, Vladimíra, Jakub Šrol and Marek Jurkovič. “Why should we try to think like scientists? Scientific reasoning and susceptibility to epistemically suspect beliefs and cognitive biases”. Applied Cognitive Psychology 34 (2020): 85–95. Print.
• Cowan, Nelson. “The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41 (2001): 87–114. Print.
• Drew, Trafton, Melissa L.-H. Võ and Jeremy M. Wolfe. “The invisible gorilla strikes again: Sustained inattentional blindness in expert observers”. Psychological Science 24 (2013): 1848–1853. Print.
• Dunbar, Robin. Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996. Print.
• Emerson, Gwendolyn B., Winston J. Warme, Frederick M. Wolf, James D. Heckman, Richard A. Brand and Seth S. Leopold. “Testing for the presence of positive-outcome bias in peer review. A randomized controlled trial”. Archives of Internal Medicine 170 (2010): 1934–1939. Print.
• Gigerenzer, Gerd and Daniel G. Goldstein. “Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality”. Psychological Review 103 (1996): 650–669. Print.
• Gigerenzer, Gerd and Henry Brighton. “Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences”. Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (2009): 1756–8757. Print.
• Goto, Hiromu. “Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds ‚l῾ and ‚r῾”. Neuropsychologia 9 (1971): 317–323. Print.
• Haselton, Martie G., Daniel Nettle and Paul W. Andrews. “The evolution of cognitive bias”. The handbook of evolutionary psychology. Ed. David M. Buss. New York: John Wiley, 2005, 724–746. Print.
• Hoffman, Daniel D., Manish Singh and Chetan Prakash. “The interface theory of perception”. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 22 (2015): 1480–1506. Print.
• Johnson, Dominic D. P., Daniel T. Blumstein, James H. Fowler and Martie G. Haselton. “The evolution of error: Error management, cognitive constraints, and adaptive decision-making biases”. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28 (2013): 474–481. Print.
• Kahneman, Daniel, Alan B. Krueger, David Schkade, Norbert Schwarz and Arthur A. Stone. “Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion”. Science 312 (2006): 1908–1910. Print.
• Kanwisher, Nancy and Galit Yovel. “The fusiform face area: A cortical region specialized for the perception of faces”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 361 (2006): 2109–2128. Print.
• Kuhl, Patricia K. “Is speech learning ‘gates’ by the social brain?”. Developmental Science 10 (2007): 110–120. Print.
• Kuhl, Patricia K., Barbara T. Conboy, Sharon Coffey-Corina, Denise Padden, Maritza RiveraGaxiola and Tobey Nelson. “Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: New data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e)”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363 (2008): 979–1000. Print.
• Leiss, Elisabeth. “Categorical versus thetic sentences in the Universal Grammar of Realism”. Thetics and categoricals. Ed. Werner Abraham, Elisabeth Leiss and Yasuhiro Fujinawa. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2020, 13–29. Print.
• Letrud, Kåre and Sigbjørn Hernes. “Affirmative citation bias in scientific myth debunking: A three-in-one case study”. PLOS ONE 14 (2019): Article e0222213. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0222213. 27.1.2023.
• Levine, Linda J., Vincent Prohaska, Stewart L. Burgess, John A. Rice and Tracy M. Laulhere. “Remembering past emotions: The role of current appraisals”. Cognition and Emotion 15 (2001): 393–417. Print.
• Loftus, Elizabeth F. and Jacqueline E. Pickrell. “The formation of false memories”. Psychiatric Annals 25 (1995): 720–725. Print.
• Lord, Charles G., Lee Ross and Mark R. Lepper. “Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effect of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (1979): 2098–2109. Print.
• Ma, Wei Ji, Masud Husain and Paul M. Bays. “Changing concepts of working memory”. Nature Neuroscience 17 (2014): 347–356. Print.
• Mahoney, Michael J. and Bobby G. DeMonbreun. “Psychology of the scientist: An analysis of problem-solving bias”. Cognitive Therapy and Research 1 (1977): 229–238. Print.
• McGurk, Harry and John MacDonald. “Hearing lips and seeing voices”. Nature 264 (2009): 746–748. Print.
• McKay, Ryan T. and Daniel C. Dennett. “The evolution of misbelief ”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2009): 493–561. Print.
• Miller, George A. “The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information”. Psychological Review 63 (1956): 81–97. Print.
• Mynatt, Clifford R., Michael E. Doherty and Ryan D. Tweney. “Consequences of confirmation and disconfirmation in a simulated research environment”. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 30 (1978): 395–406. Print.
• Sanitioso, Rasyid, Ziva Kunda and Geoffrey T. Fong. “Motivated recruitment of autobiographical memories”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 (1990): 229–241. Print.
• Schkade, David A. and Daniel Kahneman. “Does living in California make people happy? A focusing illusion in judgments of life satisfaction”. Psychological Science 9 (1998): 340–346. Print.
• Shaw, Julia and Stephen Porter. “Constructing rich false memories of committing crime”. Psychological Science 26 (2015): 291–301. Print.
• Sherif, Muzafer, Daniel Taub and Carl I. Hovland. “Assimilation and contrast effects of anchoring stimuli on judgments”. Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (1958): 150–155. Print.
• Simons, Daniel J. and Daniel T. Levin. “Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction”. Psychological Bulletin & Review 5 (1998): 644–649. Print.
• Snyder, Mark and Nancy Cantor. “Testing hypotheses about other people: The use of historical knowledge”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 15 (1979): 330–342. Print.
• Snyder, Mark and William B. Swann. “Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36 (1978): 1202–1212. Print.
• Sönning, Lukas and Valentin Werner. “The Replication crisis, scientific revolutions, and linguistics”. Linguistics 59 (2021): 1179–1206. Print.
• Stanovich, Keith E., Richard F. West and Maggie E. Toplak. “Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence”. Current Directions in Psychological Science 22 (2013): 259–264. Print.
• Strack, Fritz, Leonhard L. Martin and Norbert Schwarz. “Priming and communication: Social determinants of information use in judgments of life satisfaction”. European Journal of Social Psychology 18 (1988): 429–442. Print.
• Taber, Charles S. and Milton Lodge. “Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs”. American Journal of Political Science 50 (2006): 755–769. Print.
• Tomasello, Michael. The origins of human communication. Cambridge & London: The MIT Press, 2008. Print.
• Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman. “Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases”. Science 185 (1974): 1124–1131. Print.
• Webster, Michael A. “Evolving concepts of sensory adaptation”. F1000 Biology Reports 4 (2012): Article 21. https://doi.org/10.3410/B4–21. 27.1.2023.
• Westen, Drew, Pavel S. Blagov, Keith Harenski, Clint Kilts and Stephan Hamann. “Neural bases of motivated reasoning: An fMRI study of emotional constraints on partisan political judgment in the 2004 U.S. presidential election”. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 (2006): 1947–1958. Print.
• Wilson, Timothy D., Christopher E. Houston, Kathryn M. Etling and Nancy Brekke. “A new look at the anchoring effects: Basic anchoring and its antecedents”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 125 (1996): 387–402. Print.
• Young, S. Stanley and Alan Karr. “Deming, data and observation studies. A process out of control and needing fixing“. Significance 8 (2011): 116–120. Print.
• Zaidi, Qasim, Andrea Li, Carson Wong, Elias H. Cohen a d Xin Meng. “Hard-wired and plastic mechanisms in 3-D shape perception”. Shape perception in human and computer vision. Advances in computer vision and pattern recognition. Ed. Sven J. Dickinson and Zygmunt Pizlo. London: Springer, 2013, 311–338. Print.

Identifiers

DOI

10.23817/lingtreff.23-1