Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2014 | 2 | 2 | 121-139

Article title

Minimizing redundancies and ways to deal with trade-offs in decision making within integrated management systems

Authors

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
Integrated Management Systems (IMS) are supposed to contribute to sustainable development. However, the moment a company only uses short term win-win situation to comply, the real contribution to sustainable development may be questionable. As trade-offs between sustainability aims and the company’s goals appear, companies may behave opportunistically, and externalize the elements which are difficult to fulfil in an IMS, e.g. by way of outsourcing. At such a moment, the IMS may function on paper, while the whole industry or logistic chain does not improve its contribution to sustainability. As a consequence, it may be necessary to assess the whole industry or logistic chain (logistic chain integration for IMS) regarding the impact of an IMS on sustainable development. After presenting the aims of the IMS and “the business case” for reducing redundancies and dealing with trade-offs, the issue of “externalizing” problems to parties outside the IMS is discussed. After a presentation of different solutions for dealing with this problem, some conclusions will be drawn.

Year

Volume

2

Issue

2

Pages

121-139

Physical description

Dates

online
2014-06-01

Contributors

author
  • Wrocław School of Banking

References

  • Akerlof G.A., Shiller R.J. (2009), Animal Spirits – how human psychology drives the economy, and why it mattersfor global capitalism, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Bernardo M., Casadesus M., Karapetovic S., Heras S. (2009), How Integrated are Environmental, Quality and other Standardized Management Systems? An empirical study, “Journal of Cleaner Production” vol. 17 no. 8, pp. 742-750.
  • Dansk Standard (2000), Quality Management Systems – requirements. DS/EN ISO 9001. 3 edition.
  • De Simone L., Popoff F. (1997), Eco-Efficiency: the business link to sustainable development, MIT Press, Cambridge.
  • Douglas A., Glen D. (2000), Integrated Management Systems in Small and Medium Enterprises, “Total Quality Management” vol. 11 no. 4-6, pp. 686-690.
  • Dyllick T., Hockerts K. (2002), Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability,” Business Strategy and the Environment” vol. 11 no. 2, pp. 130-141.
  • Ingale D., Levén C. (2012), Corporate Social Responsibility: a comparative case study of Schenker and DHL, Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
  • Jørgensen T. H. (2001), Miljøledelse – systemer, standarder og praksis [Environmental Management – Systems, Standards and Practice], “Skriftserie” 277, Aalborg University, Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg.
  • Jørgensen T. H., Simonsen G. (2002), Prospects of a Unified Management System, “Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management” vol. 9 no. 2, pp. 91-98.
  • Jørgensen T.H., Mellado M.D., Remmen A. (2004), Integrated Management Systems, “Working paper” 7, Aalborg University, Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg, vbn.aau.dk/files/16063045/workingpaper7.pdf, accessed [20.05.2013].
  • Molho I. (1997), The Economics of Information – lying and cheating in markets and organizations, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
  • Karapetrovic S. (2003), Musings on Integrated Management Systems, “Measuring Business Excellence” vol. 7 no. 1, pp. 4-13.
  • Mail Online (2010), There’s no Brakes… Hold on and Pray’: last words of man before he and his family died in Toyota Lexus crash, 3 February 2010, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1248177/Toyota-recall-Lastwords-father-family-died-Lexus-crash.html [19.05.2013].
  • Platje J. (2004), Institutional Change and Poland’s Economic Performance since the 1970s – incentives and transaction costs. CL Consulting i Logistyka, Wrocław.
  • Platje J. (2011), Institutional Capital – creating capacity and capabilities for sustainable development. Opole: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Opolskiego.
  • Schaltegger S., Hasenmüller P. (2005), Ergebnispapier zum Fachdialog des Bundesumweltministeriums (BMU) am 17. November 2005, Centre for Sustainability Management (CSM), Lüneburg, http://www.bmu.de/fileadmin/bmu-import/files/wirtschaft_und_umwelt/unternehmensverantwortung_csr/ nachhaltigkeitsmanagement/application/pdf/fachdialog_nachhaltiges_wirtschaften.pdf [20.05.2013].

Notes

EN

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

ISSN
2353 - 9119

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-139edac0-1f36-4e92-84df-44762ac4514d
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.