Which authority is competent to decide when a power company is abusing monopolistic power: the President of the UOKiK or the President of the URE? Case comment to the judgement of the Supreme Court of April 2, 2009 – ENION S.A. (Ref. No III SK 36/08). - Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies - Volume 4(4) (2011) - CEJSH - Yadda

Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Article details

Journal

Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies

2011 | 4(4) | 225-229

Article title

Which authority is competent to decide when a power company is abusing monopolistic power: the President of the UOKiK or the President of the URE? Case comment to the judgement of the Supreme Court of April 2, 2009 – ENION S.A. (Ref. No III SK 36/08).

Authors

Aleksander Maziarz

Content

Full texts:

glosa

Download

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN

Keywords

Publisher

Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania

Journal

Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies

Year

2011

Volume

4(4)

Pages

225-229

Physical description

Dates

published

2011-06-01

Contributors

author

Aleksander Maziarz

College of Law, Leon Kozmiński Academy

References

Czarnecka M., Ogłódek T., Prawo energetyczne. Komentarz [Energy Law. Commentary], Warszawa 2009.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-1405575e-eabf-4c70-b387-d324ea65d525

JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.