Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2020 | 3 | 43-56

Article title

The expectations of primary, high school and university students towards ICT education

Selected contents from this journal

Title variants

PL
Oczekiwania uczniów szkół podstawowych, ponadpodstawowych i wyższych w stosunku do edukacji informatycznej

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
Selection of the curriculum content in information technology education is a difficult task, both due to the different range of skill levels in various groups of students and the rapid devaluation of some of the subjects. Curriculums, which usually contain generally defined content, giving the freedom of choice as to how to implement it, are developed by expert teams, not leaving much margin for the needs formulated by students. The paper attempts to discuss the process of creating information technology curricula for primary, secondary and humanities students. In the line of deliberations there is a question whether the opinion of students who articulate their expectations in this respect should be taken into account in the process of creating ICT curricula. This opinion is presented in the results of conducted research.
PL
Wybór treści programowych w edukacji informatycznej jest trudnym zadaniem, zarówno ze względu na zróżnicowany zakres poziomów umiejętności w różnych grupach uczniów, jak i szybką dewaluację niektórych zagadnień. Programy nauczania, które zazwyczaj zawierają ogólnie zdefiniowane treści, dające swobodę wyboru sposobu ich realizacji, opracowywane są przez zespoły ekspertów, nie pozostawiając dużego marginesu na formułowane przez studentów potrzeby. W artykule podjęto próbę omówienia procesu tworzenia programów nauczania informatyki dla uczniów szkół podstawowych, średnich i humanistycznych. W toku rozważań pojawia się pytanie, czy w procesie tworzenia programów nauczania ICT należy brać pod uwagę opinię uczniów, którzy wyrażają swoje oczekiwania w tym zakresie. Taka opinia znajduje odzwierciedlenie w wynikach przeprowadzonych badań.

References

  • Augustyniak J. (2017, nr 14). Expectations of young people towards modern school. School – Occupation – Work, p. 141–152.
  • Bochenek M., Tanaś M., Wrońska A., Lange R., Fila M., Loba B., V F. (2017). Report from the study Nastolatki 3.0. Warsaw: NASK – Research Institute.
  • Bureau of Labour Ststistics (2019, 06. 24). Table 1.2 Employment by detailed occupation, 2016 and projected 2026 (Numbers in thousands). Downloaded from Bureau of Labour Ststistics: https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/emp-by-detailed-occupation.htm
  • DIGITAL 2019: GLOBAL DIGITAL YEARBOOK. (2019, 31 01). Downloaded from DataReportal: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2019-global-digital-yearbook?utm_ source=Reports&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=Digital_2019&utm_content=Global_ Overview_Promo_Slide.
  • Global Agenda Council on the Future of Software & Society (2015). Deep Shift Technology Tipping Points and Societal Impact. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
  • Heitink M., Voogt J., Fisser P., Verplanken L., Van Braak J. (2017, 3). Eliciting teachers’ technological pedagogical knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, p. 96–110.
  • Katz I.R., Williamson D.M., Nadelman H.L., Kirsch I., Almond R.G., Cooper P.L., Redman M.L., Zapata D. (2004, 01). Assessing Information and Communications Technology Literacy for Higher Education. Downloaded from Rresearch Gate: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245507800_ Assessing_Information_and_Communications_Technology_Literacy_for_Higher_Education/ references.
  • Konarzewski K. (2012). The art of teaching: School. Warsaw: PWN.
  • Kuruliszwili S. (2016). Information technologies and andragogy – current educational challenges. Warsaw: Institute for the Development of Social Services Publishing House.
  • Moore M.G. (1997). Theory of transactional distance. In: K. D., Theoretical Principles of Distance Education (p. 22–38). New York: Routledge.
  • Office for National Statistrics. (2019, 03 4). Exploring the UK’s digital divide. Downloaded from Office for National Statistics: https://www.ons.gov.uk/releases/exploringtheuksdigitaldivide
  • Okoń W. (1998). New Pedagogical Dictionary. Warsaw: ŻAK.
  • Sijko K., Biedrzycki K., Jasiewicz J. et al. (2014). Computer and digital competences of young people in Poland. Report from the International Computer and Information Literacy Survey ICILS 2013. Warsaw: Educational Research Institute.
  • Sysło M.M. (2014). COMPUTATIONAL THINKING A new perspective on digital competence. Information technology in education, XI (p. 15–32). Toruń: UMK.
  • Sysło N. (2013). Expert proposal. In H.L.M., WHAT URGENT CHANGES DOES THE POLISH SCHOOL NEED? EXPERT PROPOSALS (p. 46). Warsaw: Hojnacki L., Polak M.
  • Thammasaeng P. Pupat P. Petchaboon S. (2016, Vol. 11 ISSUE 12). Needs Assessment of Information and Communication Technology Literacy (ICT Literacy) of Students in Secondary Educational Service Area. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, p. 9–14.
  • The Association of College and Research Libraries. (2000). Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Chicago: American Library Association.
  • Wing J.M. (2006, Vol. 49 No. 3). Computational Thinking. Downloaded from COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM: https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~15110-s13/Wing06-ct.pdf

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

ISSN
1507-6563

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-14b7af0b-012c-4061-92c1-ad469510ef28
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.