Przydatność systemów e‑zdrowia w opinii pacjentów i pracowników ochrony zdrowia

• Authors: Duplaga Mariusz
• Languages of publication: PL

Keywords

PL

e‑zdrowie; telemedycyna; akceptacja użytkowników

• Publisher: Stowarzyszenie Przyjaciół Medycyny Rodzinnej i Lekarzy Rodzinnych
• Journal: Family Medicine & Primary Care Review
• Year: 2013
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 450-453

Contributors

author

Duplaga Mariusz

References

• Amenta F. The International Radio Medical Centre (C.I.R.M.): an organization providing free medical assistance to seafarers of any nationality world wide. Int Marit Health 2000; 51(1–4): 85–91.
• Gershon-Cohen J, Colley AG. Telediagnosis. Radiol 1950; 55: 582–587.
• Wittson C, Benschotter R. Two-Way Television: helping the medical center reach out. Am J Psych 1972; 129(5): 136–139.
• Bashshur RL, Shannon GW. Telemedicine comes of age. In: Bashshur RL, Shannon GW, eds. History of telemedicine. Evolution,context and transformation. New Rochelle NY: Mary Ann Lieber Inc; 2009: 185–238.
• Bashshur RL, Shannon GW. The pioneering period: 1955 to 1972. In: Bashshur RL, Shannon GW, eds. History of telemedicine.Evolution, context and transformation. New Rochelle NY: Mary Ann Lieber Inc; 2009: 155–181.
• Eysenbach G. What is e-health? J Med Internet Res 2001; 3(2): e20.
• Bashshur R, Shannon G, Krupiński E, et al. The taxonomy of telemedicine. Telemed J e-Health 2011; 17(6): 484–495.
• Centrum Systemów Informacyjnych w Ochronie Zdrowia. Kierunki informatyzacji „e-Zdrowie Polska” na lata 2011–2015.Warszawa 2009 [cyt. 15.02.2013] Dostępny na URL: http://www.mz.gov.pl/wwwfiles/ma_struktura/docs/kierunki_e_zdrowie_09022011.pdf.
• European Commission, eHealth Action Plan 2012–2020 – Innovative healthcare for the 21st century, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2012) 736 final, Brussels, 6.12.2013 [cyt. 15.02.2013] Dostępny na URL: [http://www.kowi.de/Portaldata/2/Resources/fp/2012-COM-eHealthActionPlan-2012-2020.pdf.
• Briggs JS, Adams C, Falahkhair S, et al. M-health review: joining up healthcare in a wireless world. Technical Report, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, 9th July 2012 [cyt. 15.02.2013] Dostępny na URL: http://eprints.port.ac.uk/8941/1/mhealth_review_revised.pdf.
• Black AD, Car J, Pagliari C, et al. The impact of ehealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview. PLoS Med 2011; 8(1): e1000387.
• 12. Sutcliffe A, Thew S, De Bruijn O, et al. User engagement by user-centred design in e-Health. Phil Trans R Soc A 2010;368(1926): 4209–4224.
• De Rouck S, Jacobs A, Leys M. A methodology for shifting the focus of e-health support design onto user needs: a case in the homecare field. Int J Med Informatics 2008; 77(9): 589–601.
• Or CKL, Karsh BT. A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16: 550–560.
• Wilson EV, Lankton NK. Modeling patients’ acceptance of provider-delivered e-health. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11:241–248.
• Beckjord EB, Rutten LJF, Squiers L, et al. Use of the internet to communicate with health care providers in the United States:estimates from the 2003 and 2005 Health Information National Trends Surveys (HINTS). J Med Internet Res 2007; 9(3): e20.
• Takahashi Y, Ohura T, Ishizaki T, et al. Internet use for health-related information via personal computers and cell phones in Japan: a cross-sectional population-based survey. J Med Internet Res 2011; 13(4): e110.
• Zajac IT, Flight IH, Wilson C, et al. Internet usage and openness to internet-delivered health information among Australian adults aged over 50 years. Australas Med J 2012; 5(5): 262–267.
• Renahy E, Parizot I, Chauvin P. Internet and health: lessons learned from the French national survey on households living conditions in 2005. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2008; 56(2): 117–125.
• Rice RE. Influences, usage, and outcomes of Internet health information searching: multivariate results from the Pew surveys.Int J Med Inform 2006; 75: 8–28.
• Siliquini R, Ceruti M, Lovato E, et al. Surfing the internet for health information: an Italian survey on use and population choices.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2011; 11: 21.
• Duplaga M. Acceptance of Internet-Based Health Care Services Among Households in Poland: Secondary analysis of a population-based survey. J Med Internet Res 2012; 14(6): e164.
• van de Poll-Franse LV, van Eenbergen MC. Internet use by cancer survivors: current use and future wishes. Supp Care Cancer 2008; 16: 1189–1195.
• Buntrock S, Hopfgarten T, Adolfsson J, et al. The Internet and prostate cancer patients. Searching and finding information.Scand J Urol Nephrol 2007; 41(5): 367–374.
• Cima RR, Anderson KJ, Larson DW, et al. Internet use by patients in an inflammatory bowel disease specialty clinic. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2007; 13(10): 1266–1270.
• van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CHC, Taal E, et al. Health-related Internet use by patients with somatic diseases: frequency of use and characteristics of users. Inform Health Soc Care 2009; 34(1): 18–29
• Duplaga M. The acceptance of e-health solutions among patients with chronic respiratory conditions. Telemedicine J e-Health J (w druku).
• Duplaga M, Andrychiewicz A, Danda J. The opinions about e-health among nurses employed in hospitals located in urban area in Poland. CIN-Comput Inform Nu (w druku).
• Richards H, King G, Reid M, et al. Remote working: survey of attitudes to e-Health of doctor and nurses in rural general practices in the United Kingdom. Fam Pract 2005; 22: 2–7.
• Eley R, Fallon T, Soar J, et al. Barriers to use of information and computer technology by Australia’s nurses: a national survey.J Clin Nurs 2008; 18: 1151–1158.
• Ragneskog H, Gerdnert L. Competence in nursing informatics among nursing students and staff at a nursing institute in Sweden.Health Info Libr J 2006; 23: 126–132.
• Edirippulige S, Beattie H, Davies E, et al. Pre-registration nurses: an investigation of knowledge, experience and comprehension of e-health. Aust J Adv Nurs 2007; 25: 78–83.
• Hassol A, Walker JM, Kidder D, et al. Patient experiences and attitudes about access to a patient electronic health care record and linked web messaging. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11(6): 505–513.
• Andresen H. Norwegian Health Care Professionals’ Attitudes towards eHealth. Scandinavian Health Informatics and Terminology Conference 2008, Proceedings. Högskolan i Kalmar, eHälsoinstitutet, 2008
• Dobrev A, Haesner M, Hüsing T, et al. Benchmarking ICT use among general practitioners in Europe. Final Report. European Commission Information Society and Media Directorate General, empirica Bonn, April 2008.
• Gund A, Lindecrantz K, Schaufelberger M, et al. Attitudes among healthcare professionals towards ICT and home follow-up in chronic heart failure care. BMC Med Inform Dec Making 2012; 12: 138.
• Dünnebeil S, Sunyaev A, Blohm I, et al. Determinants of physicians’ technology assistance for e-health in ambulatory care. Int J Med Informatics 2012; 81: 746–760.
• Moick M, Terlutter R. Physicians’ motives for professional Internet use and differences in attitudes toward the Internet-Informed Patient, Physician-Patient Communication, and Precribing Behavior. Med 2.0 2012; 192: e2.