CAPABILITY APPROACH JAKO PODEJŚCIE BADAWCZE W POLITYCE SPOŁECZNEJ

• Authors: Kurowska Anna

Title variants

CAPABILITY APPROACH IN SOCIAL POLICY ANALYSIS

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

Autorka prezentuje propozycję osadzenia badań polityki społecznej w podejściu zorientowanym na możliwości (Capability Approach). Ukazuje również w jaki sposób można zreinterpretować za pomocą CA jedną z kluczowych pespektyw badawczych we współczesnych badaniach porównawczych welfare state. Przedstawia ona również przykład empirycznego zastosowania swojej propozycji w badaniu porównawczym systemów urlopów rodzinnych w krajach nordyckich i bałtyckich. Artykuł ma na celu zainspirowanie czytelników do podejmowania dalszych rozważań prezentowanego zagadnienia a także szerszego zastosowania podejścia zorientowanego na realne możliwości w badaniach polityki społecznej w Polsce.

EN

The author aims at providing theoretical and methodological frames for the application of Capability Approach (CA) in social policy research/analysis. She also povides a reconceptualization of the mainstream analytical perspective in comparative social policy in CA ((de)familialization). Furthermore, she describes an example of the study in which she uses CA to systematically compare Nordic and Baltic parental leave systems showing the advantages of using CA in comparative studies.

Keywords

PL

podejście zorientowane na możliwości; polityka społeczna jako nauka; badania porównawcze; urlopy rodzicielskie

EN

Capabilities; policy analysis; comparative social policy; parental leaves

• Publisher: Institute of Labor and Social Studies, Warsaw
• Journal: Polityka Społeczna
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 44
• Issue: 5-6(518-519)
• Pages: 20–26

Contributors

author

Kurowska Anna

• Instytut Polityki Społecznej, Uniwersytet Warszawski

References

• Brugiavini A., Pasini G., Trevisan E. (2010), Maternity and labour market outcome: Short and long term effects, MEA discussion paper series 10222.
• Ciccia R., Verloo M. (2012), Parental Leave Regulations and the Persistence of the Male Breadwinner Model: Using Fuzzy-Set Ideal Type Analysis to Assess Gender Equality in an Enlarged Europe, „Journal of European Social Policy”, Vol. 22(5), p. 507–528.
• Comim F., Qizilbash M., Alkire S. (2008), The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Crosby F.J., Sabattini L., Aizawa M. (2013), Affirmative action and gender equality, w: M.K. Ryan, N.R. Branscombe, The SAGE Handbook of Gender and Psychology, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
• Eiffe F.F. (2008), A Capability Approach for the European Union, Working Papers 03/2008, Institut fur Sozialpolitik, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna, http://epub.wu.ac.at/1318/ [dostęp 15.03.2017].
• Esping-Andersen G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
• Esping-Andersen G. (1999), Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Europe 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Communication from teh Commission, Bruksela 3.3.2010, http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN: PDF [dostęp 15.03.2017].
• Fahlen E. (2013), Capabilities and childbearing intentions in Europe, „European Societies”, Vol. 15(5), p. 639–662.
• Fahlen S. (2012), Facets of Work-Life Balance across Europe. How the interplay of institutional contexts, work arrangements and individual resources affect capabilities for having a family and being involved in family life, Stockholm University, Stockholm.
• Gough (2014), Lists and Thresholds: comparing the Doyal-Gough theory of human need with Nussbaum’s capabilities approach, w: F. Comim, M.C. Nussbaum, Capabilities, Gender, Equality. Towards Fundamental Entitlements, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, s. 357–381.
• Hobson B. (2011), The Agency Gap in Work-Life Balance: Applying Sen’s Capabilities Framework Within European Contexts, „Social Politics”, Vol. 18(2), p. 147–167.
• Hobson B. (2014), Work-Life Balance, The Agency & Capabilities Gap, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Huerta M.C. et al. (2013), Father’s leave, father’s involvement and child development: Are they related? Evidence from four OECD countries, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 140.
• Javornik J., Kurowska A. (2017), Work and Care opportunities under different parental leave systems: gender and class inequalities in northern Europe, „Social Policy & Administration”, Vol. 51, Issue 4 (in press).
• Jenson J. (2009), Lost in translation: The social investment perspective and gender equality, „Social Politics”, Vol. 16(4), p. 446–483.
• Korpi W. (2000), Faces of Inequality: Gender, Class, and Patterns of Inequalities in Different Types of Welfare States, „Social Politics”, Vol. 7, Issue 2, p. 127–191.
• Korpi W., Ferrarini T., Englund S. (2013), Women’ s opportunities under different family policy constellations: Gender, class, and inequality tradeoffs inWestern Countries reexamined, „Social Politics”, Vol. 20, Issue 1, p. 1–40.
• Kuklys W. (2005), Amartya Sen’s capability approach: Theoretical Insights and Empirical Applications, Springer, Berlin.
• Kurowska A. (2016), (De)familialization and (De)genderization – Competing or Complementary perspectives in Comparative Policy Analysis?, „Social Policy & Administration”, online first, DOI: 10.1111/spol.12272.
• Lister R. (1994), She has other duties – women, citizenship and social security, w: S. Baldwin, J. Falkingham (eds.), Social Security and Social Change: New Challenges to the Beveridge Model, Harvester Wheatsheaf, London, p. 31–44.
• Morel N., Palier B., Palme J. (2012), Beyond the welfarestate we knew it?, w: Morel N., Palier B., Palme J. (eds.), Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and challenges, The Policy Press, Bristol, p. 1–32.
• Morel N., Palier B., Palme J., eds. (2012), Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Idas, Policies and challenges, The Policy Press, Bristol.
• Nussbaum M.C. (2001), Women and Human Development. The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Olędzki M. (1981), Wstęp do teorii polityki społecznej, PWE, Warszawa.
• Papadopoulos F., Tsakloglou P. (2005), Social Exclusion in the EU. A capabilitybased approach, European Institute Working Paper 2005/01, http://www.lse.ac.uk/europeanInstitute/LEQS%20Discussion%20Paper%20Series/EIWP2005-01.pdf [dostęp 15.03.2017].
• Pfau-Effinger B. (2012), Women’s Employment in the Institutional and Cultural­Context, „International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy”, Vol. 32(9), p. 530–543.
• Robeyns I. (2006), Capability Approach in Practice, „The Journal of Political Philosophy”, Vol. 14(3), p. 351–376.
• Ruhm C.J. (2000), Parental leave and child health, „Journal of Health Economics”, Vol. 19(6), p. 931–960.
• Saraceno C. (1997), Family change, family policies and the restructuring of welfare, w: Family, Market and Community: Equity and Efficiency in Social Policy, Organisationfor Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, p. 81–100.
• Saxonberg S. (2013), From defamilialization to degenderization: Toward a new welfare typology, „Social Policy & Administration”, Vol. 47(1), p. 26–49.
• Sen A. (1983), Choice, Welfare, and Measurement, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
• Sen A. (1985), Commodities and Capabilities, 1st ed., North-Holland Sole distributors for the U.S.A. New York, NY and Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Canada.
• Sen A. (1992), Inequality Reexamined, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Sen A. (1999a), Commodities and Capabilities, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Delhi, New York.
• Sen A. (1999b), Development as Freedom, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Sen A. (2009), The Idea of Justice, Allen Lane and Harvard University Press, New Delhi.
• Szarfenberg R. (2002), Recenzja książki: Amartya Sen. Nierówności. Dalsze Rozważania, „Problemy Polityki Społecznej, Studia i Dyskusje”, nr 4, s. 255–266.
• Szarfen­berg R. (2003a), Recenzja książki: Amartya Sen. Rozwój i Wolność, „Problemy Polityki Społecznej, Studia i Dyskusje”, nr 5, s. 189–200.
• Szarfenberg R. (2003b), Definicje polityki społecznej, zmodyfikowany fragment pracy doktorskiej, http://rszarf.ips.uw.edu.pl/pdf/definicjeps.pdf [dostęp 15.03.2017].
• Szarfenberg R. (2013), Perspektywy badawcze polityki społecznej – wprowadzenie, „Problemy Polityki Społecznej. Studia i Dyskusje”, nr 22(3), s. 11–22.
• Szarfenberg R., (2008), Krytyka i afirmacja polityki społecznej, Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN, Warszawa.
• Szczepański J. (1981), Konsumpcja a rozwój człowieka, PWE, Warszawa.
• Thaler R.H., Sunstein C.R (2008), Nudge. Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness, Yale University Press.
• Warren T. (2015), Worklife balance/imbalance: the dominance of the middle class and the neglect of the working class, „The British Journal of Sociology” Vol. 66(4), p. 691–717.
• Yerkes M.A., den Dulk L. (2015), Arbeidenzorgbeleid in de participatiesamenleving, „Tijdschrift Voor Arbeidsvraagstukken”, No. 31, p. 510–528.