Brutalities in Anti-Imperial Revolts. Commonalities and Differences in Distinct yet Overlapping Forms of Violence by Peripheral Ethnic-Indigenous Communities and Imperial Powers in Classical, Medieval and Modern (Industrial) Times

• Authors: ten Dam Caspar , Polanski Tomasz
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In order to understand and resolve internal armed conflicts one must comprehend why and how people revolt, and under what conditions they brutalise i.e. increasingly resort to terrorism, banditry, brigandry, “gangsterism” and other forms of violence that violate contemporary local and/or present‑day international norms that I believe are, in the final analysis, all based on the principles of conscience, empathy and honour. Contemporary “global” or regional norms distinct from those of the rebelling community, and the norms of the regime community and/or colonial power, are also considered. My pessimistically formulated and thereby quite testable brutalisation theory combines theorising elements of disciplines ranging from cultural anthropology to military psychology, so as to better explain rebellions or any armed conflicts and their morally corrosive effects. The theory’s main variables are: violence‑values (my composite term) on proper and improper violence; conflict‑inducing motivations, in particular grievances, avarices, interests and ideologies, that bring about i.e. cause or trigger the conflict; combat‑stresses like fear, fatigue and rage resulting from or leading to traumas (and hypothetically to brutalities as well); and conflict‑induced motivations, in particular grievances, avarices, interest and ideologies, that happen by, through and during the conflict. The present paper is an exploratory introduction to an ambitious research project, succinctly titled “Brutalisation in Anti‑Imperial Revolts”, with advice and support from Professor Tomasz Polanski. The paper addresses the project’s relevance and its epistemological and methodological challenges. The project seeks to explain rebellion, banditry and other forms of violence that may or may not be inherently brutal. It seeks to ascertain the causes and degrees of any brutalisations i.e. increasing violations of norms during rebellions by peripheral, marginalised ethnic (indigenous) communities against their overlords in classical, medieval and “modern” (industrial) times. It introduces seven selected cases of “peripheral‑ethnic revolts” by indigenous communities – as (semi‑) state actors, non‑state actors or both (yet possessing at least residual ruling capabilities) – against Imperial powers across the ages, with a special focus on banditry, “brigandry” (brigandage), guerrilla and other forms of irregular warfare. The first stage of the research will analyse and compare the causes i.e. motivations and involved norms, sorts of violence and degrees of brutalisation in these seven cases.

Keywords

EN

armed conflicts; violence; brutalization theory; anti‑imperial revolts

• Publisher: Księgarnia Akademicka
• Journal: Politeja : Pismo Wydziału Studiów Miedzynarodowych i Politycznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
• Year: 2015
• Issue: 1(31/2)
• Pages: 199-230

Contributors

author

ten Dam Caspar

• Leiden University

author

Polanski Tomasz

References

• Bell J.B., The Dynamics of the Armed Struggle, London–Portland (OR) 1998.
• Bell J.B., The Myth of the Guerrilla; Revolutionary Theory and Malpractice, New York 1971.
• Bell J.B., On Revolt. Strategies of National Liberation, Cambridge (Mass.) 1976.
• Bell J.B., A Time of Terror. How Democratic Societies Respond to Revolutionary Violence, New York 1978.
• Berkowitz L., Aggression. A Social Psychological Analysis, New York 1962 (McGraw‑Hill Series in Psychology).
• Berkowitz L., Roots of Aggression; a Re‑examination of the Frustration‑Aggression Hypothesis, New York 1969.
• Bourdieu P., Political Interventions. Social Science and Political Action, texts selected and introduced by F. Poupeau, T. Discepolo, trans. by D. Fernbach, London–New York 2008.
• Byford G., ‘The Wrong War’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 81, No. 4 (2002).
• Caldwell D.H., ‘Scottish Spearmen, 1298‑1314: An Answer to Cavalry’, War in History, Vol. 19, No. 3 (2012), at .
• Carey S.C., Poe S.C. (eds.), Understanding Human Rights Violations. New Systematic Studies, Aldershot–Burlington 2004 (Ethics and Global Politics).
• Caspersen N., ‘Separatism and Democracy in the Caucasus’, Survival, Vol. 50, No. 4 (2008), at .
• Collier P., Economic Causes of Civil Conflict and their Implications for Policy, World Bank, Washington D.C. 2000 (see archive at ).
• Collier P., ‘Rebellion as a Quasi‑Criminal Activity’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 44, No. 6 (2000), at .
• Collier P., Hoeffler A., Greed and Grievance in Civil War, World Bank, Washington D.C. 2001 (Policy Research Working Paper, 2355) (see at ). Also published by Centre for the Study of African Economies, Paper 160 Working Paper Series (Berkeley Electronic Press, at ).
• Collier P., Sambanis N., ‘Understanding Civil War: A New Agenda’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 46, No. 1 (2002), at .
• Cornell D., ‘A Kingdom Cleared of Castles: The Role of the Castle in the Campaigns of Robert Bruce’, Scottish Historical Review, Vol. 87, No. 2 (2008).
• Crawford N.C., ‘Just War Theory and the U.S. Counterterror War’, Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 1, No. 1 (2003) at .
• Dam C. ten, ‘How to Feud and Rebel: 1. Violence‑values among the Chechens and Albanians’, Iran and the Caucasus, Vol. 14, No. 2 (2010), at .
• Dam C. ten, ‘How to Feud and Rebel: 2. Histories, Cultures and Grievances of the Chechens and Albanians’ Iran and the Caucasus, Vol. 15, No. 1‑2 (2011), at .
• Dam C. ten, ‘How to Feud and Rebel: 3. Combat‑stress and Violence‑values among the Chechens and Albanians’, Iran and the Caucasus, Vol. 16, No. 2 (2012), at .
• Dam C. ten, ‘Let’s be Clear: A Call for Tripartite Action‑Actor‑Motivation Conceptualisations in Social‑Scientific Research’ (Editorial), Forum of EthnoGeoPolitics, Vol. 3, No. 1 (2015).
• Dam C. ten, ‘The Limitations of Military Psychology: Combat‑stress and Violence‑values among the Chechens and Albanians’ in U. Bläsing, V. Arakelova, M. Weinreich (eds.), Studies on Iran and the Caucasus. In Honour of Garnik Asatrian, Leiden 2015.
• Dam C. ten, ‘Looking at Conflict Patterns: Declining Frequencies yet Persistent Brutalities in both Ethnic and Non‑Ethnic Conflicts’, Forum of EthnoGeoPolitics, Vol. 3, No. 2 (2015) (incl. Critical Responses and authors’ reaction).
• Dam C. ten, ‘Patriotism and Brutality vis‑à‑vis Nationalism, Ethnicity and other Identity Formations’ (Editorial), Forum of EthnoGeoPolitics, Vol. 2, No. 2 (2014).
• Dollard J. et al., Frustration and Aggression, London 1944 (International Library of Sociology and Social Reconstruction) (first published New Haven 1939).
• Elshtain J.B. (ed.), Just War Theory, Oxford 1992 (Readings in Social and Political Theory, 1).
• Fearon J.D., Laitin D.D., ‘Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War’, American Political Science Review, Vol. 97, No. 1 (2003).
• Feyter K. de et al. (eds.), Out of the Ashes. Reparation for Victims of Gross and Systematic Human Rights Violations, Antwerpen 2005.
• Grossman H.I., ‘Kleptocracy and Revolutions’, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 51, No. 2 (1999), at .
• Gurr T.R., ‘Psychological Factors in Civil Violence’, World Politics, Vol. 20, No. 2 (1968).
• Gurr T.R., Why Men Rebel, Princeton 1970.
• Hechter M., ‘Explaining Nationalist Violence’, Nations and Nationalism, Vol. 1, No. 1 (1995), at .
• Herodotus, The Histories, trans. by A. De Sélincourt, Harmondsworth 1954 (Penguin Classics, L34).
• Hobsbawm E.J., Bandits, London 1969.
• Hobsbawm E.J., Primitive Rebels. Studies in Archaic Forms of Social Movement in the 19th and 20th Century, Manchester 1959.
• Horsley R.A., ‘Ancient Jewish Banditry and the Revolt against Rome, A.D. 66‑70’, The Catholic Biblical Quarterly, Vol. 43, No. 1 (1981).
• Horsley R.A., Jesus and the Spiral of Violence. Popular Jewish Resistance in Roman Palestine, San Francisco 1987.
• Horsley R.A., ‘Josephus and the Bandits’, Journal for the Study of Judaism, Vol. 10, No. 1 1979.
• Horsley R.A., Hanson J.S., Bandits, Prophets and Messiahs. Popular Movements in the Time of Jesus, Minneapolis 1985 (New Voices in Biblical Studies).
• Johnson J.T., Ideology, Reason, and Limitation of War. Religious and Secular Concepts 1200‑1740, Princeton 1975.
• Jongman A.J., Schmid A.P., World Conflict and Human Rights Map 2000, PIOOM, Leiden 2000.
• Josephus, The Jewish Antiquities (Antiquitates Judaicae), Vol. 6: Books 14‑15, trans. by R. Marcus, ed. A. Wikgren, Cambridge (Mass.) 1965 (Loeb Classical Library, 433).
• Josephus, The Jewish War (Bellum Judaicum), trans. by G.A. Williamson, rev. trans. E.M. Smallwood, Harmondsworth 1981 (Penguin Classics) (1st ed. 1959).
• Kaldor M., New and Old Wars. Organized Violence in a Global Era, Cambridge 1999.
• Kennedy R., ‘Is One Person’s Terrorist Another’s Freedom Fighter? Western and Islamic Ap proaches to “Just War” Compared’, Terrorism and Political Violence, Vol. 11, No. 1 (1999), at .
• Krippner S., McIntyre T.M. (eds.), The Psychological Impact of War Trauma on Civilians. An International Perspective, Westport 2003 (Psychological Dimensions to War and Peace).
• La Noue F. de, The Politicke and Militarie Discourses of the Lord de la Noue, trans. by E. Aggas, London 1587.
• Lindner E.G., ‘Humiliation and Human Rights: Mapping a Minefield’, Human Rights Review, Vol. 2, No. 2 (2001), at .
• Lindner E.G., ‘Humiliation as the Source of Terrorism: A New Paradigm’, Peace Research, Vol. 33, No. 2 (2001).
• Lindner E.G., Making Enemies. Humiliation and International Conflict, Westport 2006 (Contemporary Psychology).
• Locke J., Two Treatises of Government, rev. ed. by P. Laslett, Cambridge 1960 (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought) (1965 print Mentor; based on 1698 publication in London by Awnfham & John Churchill).
• Meernink J.D., King K.L., ‘Crimes and Punishments: How the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia Distinguishes Among Massive Human Rights Violations’ in S.C.
• Carey, S.C. Poe (eds.), Understanding Human Rights Violations. New Systematic Studies, Aldershot– Burlington 2004 (Ethics and Global Politics).
• Miller N.E. et al., ‘The Frustration‑Aggression Hypothesis’, Psychological Review, Vol. 48, No. 4 (1941), at .
• Paskins B., Dockrill M., The Ethics of War, Minneapolis 1979.
• Pinker S., The Better Angels of Our Nature. Why Violence has Declined, New York 2011.
• Pinker S., ‘Decline of Violence: Taming the Devil within Us’, Nature, Vol. 478, No. 7369 (2011), at .
• Polanski T., ‘Attalos III, King and Sculptor. An Appendix to Volkommer’s Künstlerlexicon’, Studies in Ancient Art and Civilization, Vol. 17 (2013), at .
• Polanski T., ‘Boukoloi Banditry: Greek Perspectives on Native Resistance’, Grazer Beiträge, Vol. 25 (2006).
• Polanski T., ‘The Destruction of Cultural Heritage in the Kingdoms of Pontus and Kommagene during the Roman Conquest’, Iran and the Caucasus, Vol. 17, No. 3 (2013), at .
• Polanski T., ‘Oriens Militans: Extreme Traditionalist Movements in the Provincial Populace of the Ptolemaic Egypt and their Ideology’ in K. Grant‑Skiba, Z. Lew‑Wojciechowski (eds.), Lux lucet in tenebris. Księga pamiątkowa z okazji nadania prof. Bernardowi Kozirógowi doktoratu honoris causa, Vol. 1, Podkowa Leśna 2010 (reprint from Studies in Ancient Art and Civilisation, Vol. 9 (1999)).
• Polybius, The Histories, trans. by B.C. MacGing, New York 2010 (Oxford Approaches to Classical Literature).
• Runciman W.G., Relative Deprivation and Social Justice – A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth‑century England, Harmondsworth 1972 (Pelican Books) (first published by University of California Press 1966 and Routledge & Kegan Paul 1966).
• Shelton D., ‘United Nations Principles and Guidelines on Reparations: Context and Contents’ in K. de Feyter et al. (eds.), Out of the Ashes. Reparation for Victims of Gross and Systematic Human Rights Violations, Antwerpen 2005.
• Stouffer SA et al., The American Soldier, Vol. 1: Adjustment during Army Life, Princeton 1949 / Manhattan (Kan.) 1977 (Studies in Social Psychology in World War II, 1).
• Suter K., An International Law of Guerrilla Warfare. The Global Politics of Law‑Making, New York 1984 (Global Politics).
• TenDam H., How People Make the World: The Ten Global Challenges – An essay on politics, civilization and humanity, Ommen 2010 (1st ed. 1991).
• Thompson E.A., ‘Peasant Revolts in Late Roman Gaul and Spain’, Past and Present, Vol. 2, No. 1 (1952), at .
• Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War, trans. by R. Warner, Harmondsworth 1954 (Penguin Classics, L39).
• Traven B., The Rebellion of the Hanged (La Rebelión de los Colgados), London 1984, 1997 (Esperanza López Mateos & Josef Wieder, 1952).
• Van Creveld M., ‘The Clausewitzian Universe and the Law of War’, Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 26, No. 3/4 (1991), at .
• Van Creveld M., Transformation of War, New York 1991.
• Vattel E. de, The Law of Nations; or Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, trans. by T. Nugent, London 1740.
• Walzer M., Just and Unjust Wars. A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, Harmondsworth 1980 (first published in the US by Basic Books 1977).
• Weber M., ‘The Meaning of “Ethical Neutrality” in Sociology and Economics (1917)’, part 1 in E.A. Shils, H.A. Finch (eds. and transl.), The Methodology of the Social Sciences, Glencoe 1949.
• Zegveld L., The Accountability of Armed Opposition Groups in International Law, Cambridge 2002 (Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law).

Identifiers

DOI

10.12797/Politeja.12.2015.31_2.13