Language in Interaction: The Role of Conscious Processes in Conversation

• Authors: Chiera Alessandra
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Consistent with the well-established tradition of cognitive pragmatics, this work hinges on the idea that human communication has to be considered inferential in nature. Starting from the empirically-based insights of Relevance Theory, I will focus on the role of pragmatic inference processes in real language use, specifically in conversation. In order to address this question, I pursue a twofold goal. On the one hand, I intend to characterize the nature of conversational exchanges, by identifying the main features that underlie their elaboration. On the other hand, my goal is to provide some indications about the cognitive underpinnings of such conversational properties. Relevance account states that language in context can be described as a matter of expressing and recognizing intentions and that this procedure is driven by the expectations of relevance automatically processed. In accordance with the claim that the core of conversations lies in conveying and catching each other’s intentions, I will take into account the strategies employed by interlocutors and the cognitive mechanisms involved in this kind of process. Although Relevance theorists account for some important features of language in use, my hypothesis is that they falter in explaining some non-marginal aspects of real-time conversation because of two problematic issues: a) the propensity to emphasize the comprehension process omitting to account for the production process; b) the idea that it all comes down to processing relevance by means of a modular automatic device. Against these claims, I will argue that: a) conversation is a joint activity performed in coordination and requires complex abilities as on the side of the hearer as on the side of the speaker; b) automatic mechanisms cannot underlie some essential aspects inherent in conversation which are better explained by the role of conscious processes. Although the relation between language and consciousness has been traditionally neglected, the idea of putting consciousness back into the reflection on language in context has important theoretical and empirical implications.

Keywords

EN

pragmatic inference; communicative intentions; conversation; miscommunication; consciousness

• Publisher: Komisja Nauk Filologicznych Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Oddział we Wrocławiu
• Journal: Academic Journal of Modern Philology
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 3
• Pages: 7-16

Dates

published

2014

Contributors

author

Chiera Alessandra

• Doctoral School in Cognitive Science, Messina, Italy

References

• Baars, Bernard J. (2002) “The Conscious Access Hypothesis: Origins and Recent Evidence.” [In:] Trends in Cognitive Science 6; 47–52.
• Bara, Bruno G. (2011) “Cognitive Pragmatics: The Mental Processes of Communication.” [In:] Intercultural Pragmatics 8–3; 443–485.
• Berkum, Jos J. A. van, Danielle van den Brink, Cathelijne M. J. Y. Tesink, Miriam Kos, Peter Hagoort (2008) “The Neural Integration of Speaker and Message.” [In:] Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20 (4); 580–591.
• Bianchi, Claudia (2004) “Semantics and Pragmatics: The Distinction Reloaded.” [In:] Claudia Bianchi (ed.) The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. Stanford: CSLI; 1–11.
• Bianchi, Claudia (2013) “Implicating.” [In:] Marina Sbisà, Ken Turner (eds.) Pragmatics of Speech Actions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter; 83–118 (Handbooks of Pragmatics. Vol. 2).
• Bosco, Francesca, Monica Bucciarelli, Bruno G. Bara (2006) “Recognition and Repair of Communicative Failures: A Developmental Perspective.” [In:] Journal of Pragmatics 38 (9); 1398–1429.
• Brennan, Susan E., Herbert H. Clark (1996) “Conceptual Pacts and Lexical Choice in Conversation.” [In:] Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22; 1482–1493.
• Carston, Robin (ed.) (2002) “Linguistic Meaning, Communicated Meaning and Cognitive Pragmatics.” [In:] Mind and Language: Special Issue on Pragmatics and Cognitive Science 17 (1); 127–148.
• Chomsky, Noam (1988) Language and Problems of Knowledge. The Managua Lectures. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
• Coates, Jennifer (1990) “Modal Meaning: The Semantic-Pragmatic Interface.” [In:] Journal of Semantics 7; 53–64.
• Cosentino, Erica, Ines Adornetti, Francesco Ferretti (2013) “Processing Narrative Coherence: Towards a Top-Down Model of Discourse.” [In:] Open Access Series in Informatics (OASICS) 32. Special Issue 2013 Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative; 61–75.
• Dijk, Teun van (1977) Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London: Longman.
• Ferreira, Fernanda (2004) “Production-Comprehension Asymmetries.” [In:] Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2); 196.
• Ferretti, Francesco, Ines Adornetti (2012) Dalla comunicazione al linguaggio. Scimmie, ominidi e umani in una prospettiva darwiniana. Milano: Mondadori Università.
• Fodor, Jerry A. (1983) The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology. Cambridge, MA, London: The MIT Press.
• Giora, Rachel (1997) “Discourse Coherence and Theory of Relevance: Stumbling Blocks in Search of a Unified Theory.” [In:] Journal of Pragmatics 27; 17–34.
• Grice, Paul (1957) “Meaning.” [In:] The Philosophical Review 66; 377–388.
• Horton, William S., Boaz Keysar (1996) “When Do Speakers Take into Account Common Ground?” [In:] Cognition 59; 91–117.
• Jaszczolt, Katarzyna (2010) “Semantics-Pragmatics Interface.” [In:] Louise Cummings (ed.) The Routledge Pragmatics Encyclopedia. London: Routledge; 458–462.
• Knudsen, Eric I. (2007) “Fundamental Components of Attention.” [In:] Annual Review of Neuroscience 30; 57–78.
• Krauss, Robert M., Susan R. Fussell (1991) “Perspective-Taking in Communication: Representations of Others’ Knowledge in Reference.” [In:] Social Cognition 9; 2–24.
• Levelt, Willem J. M. (1989) Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
• Levinson, Stephen C. (1995) “Interaction Biases in Human Thinking.” [In:] Esther N. Goody (ed.) Social Intelligence and Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 221–260.
• Levinson, Stephen C. (2000) Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA, London: The MIT Press.
• Mazzone, Marco (2013) “Attention to the Speaker. The Conscious Assessment of Utterance Interpretations in Working Memory.” [In:] Language & Communication 33; 106–114.
• Nadig, Aparna, Julie Sedivy (2002) “Evidence of Perspective-Taking Constraints in Children’s On-Line Reference Resolution.” [In:] Psychological Science 13 (4); 329–336.
• Newman-Norlund, Sarah, Matthijs L. Noordzij, Roger Newman-Norlund, Inge Volman, Jan P. de Ruiter, Peter Hagoort, Ivan Toni (2009) “Recipient Design in Tacit Communication.” [In:] Cognition 111; 46–54.
• Noordzij, Matthijs L., Sarah Newman-Norlund, Jan P. de Ruiter, Peter Hagoort, Stephen C. Levinson, Ivan Toni (2010) “Brain Mechanisms Underlying Human Communication.” [In:] Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 3 (14); 14–27.
• Pacherie, Elisabeth, Patrick Haggard (2010) “What Are Intentions?” [In:] Lynn Nadel, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (eds.) Conscious Will and Responsibility. A Tribute to Benjamin Libet. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 70–84.
• Pickering, Martin J., Simon Garrod (2004) “Toward a Mechanistic Psychology of Dialogue.” [In:] Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2); 169–226.
• Récanati, Francois (1993) Direct Reference: From Language to Thought. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Ruiter, Jan P. de, Matthijs L. Noordzij, Sarah Newman-Norlund, Roger Newman-Norlund, Peter Hagoort, Stephen C. Levinson, Ivan Toni (2010) “Exploring the Cognitive Infrastructure of Communication.” [In:] Interaction Studies 11; 51–77.
• Shintel, Hadas, Howard C. Nusbaum (2004) “Dialogue Processing: Automatic Alignment or Controlled Understanding?” [In:] Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2); 210–211.
• Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi, Deirdre Wilson (2010) “Epistemic Vigilance.” [In:] Mind & Language 25 (4); 359–393.
• Sperber, Dan, Deirdre Wilson ([1986] 1995) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Sperber, Dan, Deirdre Wilson (2002) “Pragmatics, Modularity and Mind-Reading.” [In:] Mind and Language 17; 3–23.
• Tomasello, Michael (1999) The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Harvard University Press.
• Willems, Roel M., Miriam De Boer, Jan P. de Ruiter, Matthijs L. Noordzij, Peter Hagoort, Ivan Toni (2010) “A Dissociation between Linguistic and Communicative Abilities in the Human Brain.” [In:] Psychological Science 21 (1); 8–14.
• Wilson, Deirdre (1998) “Discourse, Coherence and Relevance: A Reply.” [In:] Journal of Pragmatics 29 (1); 57–74.
• Wilson, Deirdre, Dan Sperber (2004) “Relevance Theory.” [In:] Laurence Horn, Gergory Ward (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell; 607–632.
• Zlatev, Jordan (2008) “The Dependence of Language on Consciousness.” [In:] Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (6); 34–62.