Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Journal

2018 | 5 (77) | 4-12

Article title

University Social Responsibility Strategies

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
As the social responsibility notion developed, it caught the interest of not only businesses but also other organizations, including universities. The project described in the article aimed at researching how higher education institutions develop their social responsibility strategies. The desk research carried out covered the analysis of GRI database entries where the universities’ social responsibility and sustainable development reports are stored as well as the analysis of selected reports and universities’ websites. The two main findings of that research are: the growing social responsibility of the universities has been proved, and a vast diversity of the strategies applied was observed. As a result, seven models of creating the university strategy have been identified and described in the paper. In conclusion, we must stress that there are no universal standards regarding the placement of the strategy in the university general development plans, neither its scope, the process of creation nor the way it is communicated.

Journal

Year

Issue

Pages

4-12

Physical description

Contributors

  • SGH Warsaw School of Economics
  • SGH Warsaw School of Economics
  • SGH Warsaw School of Economics
  • SGH Warsaw School of Economics

References

  • Aalto University (2017). Sustainable Campus Charter Report of Aalto University 2016. Retrieved from http://database.globalreporting.org/reports/51315/
  • Bowen, H. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper.
  • Caltech (2017). Annual Sustainability Update 2016. Retrieved from https://www.sustainability.caltech.edu/AnnualReport
  • Carroll, A.B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance, Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505. DOI: 10.2307/257850
  • Carroll, A.B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders, Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48. DOI: 10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
  • Clarkson, M.B.E. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance, Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117. DOI: 10.2307/258888
  • Dagiliene, L., Mykolaitiene, V. (2015). Disclosure of Social Responsibility in Annual Performance Reports of Universities, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 586-592. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.454
  • Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities, Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 312-322. DOI: 10.5465/255331
  • Davis, M. (1999). Ethics and the University, New York and London: Routledge.
  • Deakin University (2016). 2015 Sustainability Report. Retrieved from http://database.globalreporting.org/reports/38833/
  • Drucker, P.F. (1984). Converting Social Problems into Business Opportunities: The New Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility, California Management Review, 26 (2), 53-63. DOI: 10.2307/41165066
  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st-Century Business. Oxford: Capstone.
  • ESADE Business School (2016). Annual Report 2014-2015. Retrieved from http://database.globalreporting.org/reports/36826/
  • Esfijani, A., Hussain, F., Chang, E. (2013). University social responsibility ontology, International Journal of Engineering Intelligent Systems, 21(4), 271-281.
  • ETH Zürich (2017). Sustainability Report 2015-2016. Retrieved from http://database.globalreporting.org/reports/52352/
  • Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix: University-industry-government innovation in action. New York and London: Routledge.
  • Frederick, W.C. (1960). The Growing Concern over Business Responsibility, California Management Review, 2(4), 54-61. DOI: 10.2307/41165405
  • Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
  • Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits, New York Times Magazine, 32-33. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14
  • Gazzola, P., Colombo G. (2014). CSR integration into the corporate strategy, Cross-Cultural Management Journal, 16(2), 331-338.
  • Geryk, M. (2010). Społeczna odpowiedzialność uczelni w percepcji jej interesariuszy. Raport z badań, Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza Szkoły Głównej Handlowej.
  • Gesteland, R.R. (2000). Różnice kulturowe a zachowania w biznesie. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Ghent University (2016). Sustainability report Ghent University 2016. Retrieved from http://database.globalreporting.org/reports/42800/
  • Hill, R.P. (2004). The Socially-Responsible University: Talking the Talk while Walking the Walk in the College of Business, Journal of Academic Ethics, 2(1), 89-100. DOI: 10.1023/B:JAET.0000039009.48115.3d
  • http://www.cauxroundtable.org/index.cfm?menuid=8 (Retrieved October 13, 2018).
  • https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principles (Retrieved October 13, 2018).
  • https://www.globalreporting.org/Pages/default.aspx (Retrieved April 20, 2018).
  • http://www.oecd.org/corporate/mne/oecdguidelinesformultinationalenterprises.htm (Retrieved October 13, 2018).
  • https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/world-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats (Retrieved April 20, 2018).
  • http://www.unprme.org/about-prme/the-six-principles.php (Retrieved October 13, 2018).
  • http://ulsf.org/talloires-declaration/ (Retrieved October 13, 2018).
  • Johnson, H.L. (1971). Business in Contemporary Society: Framework and Issues. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.
  • Jones, T.M. (1995). Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics, The Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404-437. DOI: 10.2307/258852
  • Karwowska, E., Leja, K. (2017). Tworzenie sieci współpracy uczelni z otoczeniem przy wykorzystaniu zamówień przedkomercyjnych na przykładzie projektu e-Pionier, e-mentor, 2(69), 4-13.
  • Karwowska, E., Leja, K. (2018). Czy społeczna odpowiedzialność uniwersytetu może być bardziej odpowiedzialna. Szanse wynikające z koopetycji uczelni. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326786089_Czy_spoleczna_odpowiedzialnosc_uniwersytetu_moze_byc_bardziej_odpowiedzialna_Szanse_wynikajace_z_koopetycji_uczelni
  • Leja, K. (red., 2008). Społeczna odpowiedzialność uczelni. Gdańsk: Wydział Zarządzania i Ekonomii Politechniki Gdańskiej i Instytut Społeczeństwa Wiedzy.
  • Levitt, T. (1958). The Dangers of Social Responsibility, Harvard Business Review, 36(5), 41-50.
  • Maignan, I., Ferrell, O.C. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), 3-19. DOI: 10.1177/0092070303258971
  • McGuire, J.W. (1963). Business and Society. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Metha, S.R. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Universities: Towards an Integrative Approach. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity. 1(4), 300-304. DOI: 10.7763/IJSSH.2011.V1.55
  • Nanyang Technological University (2016). NTU Sustainability Report FY15. Retrieved from http://database.globalreporting.org/reports/54190/
  • Nejati, M., Shafaei, A., Salamzadeh, Y., Daraei, M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and universities: a study of top 10 world universities' websites, African Journal of Business Management, 5(2), 440-447. DOI: 10.5897/AJBM10.554
  • PKN (2012). Norma PN-ISO 26000. Wytyczne dotyczące społecznej odpowiedzialności, Warszawa.
  • Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R. (2006). Strategy and Society: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility, Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.
  • Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R. (2011). Creating Shared Value. How to reinvent capitalism - and unleash a wave of innovation and growth, Harvard Business Review, 89(1-2), 62-77.
  • Prahalad, C.K. (2004). Fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. New York: Prentice Hall.
  • Puukka, J. (2008), Mobilising higher education for sustainable development - lessons learnt from the OECD study, Proceedings of the 4th International Barcelona Conference on Higher Education, Vol. 7. Higher education for sustainable development. GUNI, http://www.guni-rmies.net
  • Teneta-Skwiercz, D. (2017). Społecznie odpowiedzialna uczelnia - nowy paradygmat w instytucjach szkolnictwa wyższego, Marketing i Rynek, 11 (CD), 609-619.
  • Tetrevova, L., Sabolova, V. (2010). University Stakeholder Management and University Social Responsibility, WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, 7(7), 224-233.
  • The Erfurt Declaration on University Autonomy (1996), Retrieved October 13, 2018 from http://www.pef.uni-lj.si/ceps/knjiznica/doc/erfurt-declaration.pdf
  • The University of Melbourne (2016). Sustainability Report 2015 - The University of Melbourne. Retrieved from http://database.globalreporting.org/reports/45467/
  • University of Plymouth (2016). Sustainability Report 2016. Retrieved from http://database.globalreporting.org/reports/37431/
  • Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach (2014). Raport społeczny 2012-2014. Retrieved from http://database.globalreporting.org/reports/24813/
  • Vasilescu, R., Barna, C., Epure, M., Baicu, C. (2010). Developing university social responsibility: A model for the challenges of the new civil society, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2). 4177-4182. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.660

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-198e9266-f5cd-40cf-9cfb-547eef18f243
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.