2015 | 15 | 2 | 81-93
Article title


Title variants
Languages of publication
This paper reports on a one-year longitudinal study that adopted a blended teaching approach based on designing and implementing an online EFL course to be used by Greek students aged 13-14 years old along their more traditional face-to-face lessons. The reason for creating a more dynamic learning environment aligned with the rest of the curriculum was to increase EFL learners’ engagement and motivation through their exposure to authentic online material and participation in a variety of reading, writing, speaking and listening tasks. Data analysis of pre- and post-achievement tests on English language reading comprehension performance along with students’ Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) attitude questionnaire showed that participants generally had a positive attitude toward CALL. At the same time, open online access technologies gave them the opportunity to further develop their EFL reading comprehension skills. The paper concludes by highlighting the fact that online class components were not designed to fit the online tools into a task-based EFL lesson, but rather served the learning objectives of the actual lesson based on a blended teaching approach.
Physical description
  • Greek Ministry of Education
  • Almahboub, S. (2000). Attitudes toward Computer Use and Gender Differences among Kuwaiti Sixth-Grade Students. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Denton: University of North Texas.
  • Archambault, L., & Crippen, K. (2009). K-12 distance educators at work: Who's teaching online across the United States. Journal of Research on Technology and Education, 41(4), 366-387.
  • Atkins, R. (1991). Distance Education: New Technologies and Opportunities for Developing Distance Education in New South Wales. New South Wales Education Department.
  • Ayres, R. (2002). Learner attitudes toward the use of CALL. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 15(3), 241-249.
  • Bahman, G., Seyyed, M., Kamal, K., Parviz, A., & Alireza, H. (2011). The impact of asynchronous computer-assisted language learning approaches on English as a foreign language high and low achievers' vocabulary retention and recall. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 24(5), 383-391.
  • Bax, S. (2003). CALL - past, present and future. System, 31(1), 13-28.
  • Bulut, D., & AbuSeileek, A. F. (2006). Learner attitude toward CALL and level of achievement in basic language kills. Journal of Institute of Social Sciences of Erciyes University, 23(2), 112-129.
  • Chapelle, C. (2001). Computer Applications in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Compton, L. (2009). Preparing language teachers to teach language online: a look at skills, roles and responsibilities. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), 73-99.
  • Felix, U. (2003). An orchestrated vision of language learning online. In U. Felix (Ed.), Language Learning Online: Towards Best Practice (pp. 7-20). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
  • Furstenberg, G. (1997). Teaching with technology: What is at stake? ADFL Bulletin, 28 (3), 21-25.
  • Gillespie, J., & McKee, J. (1999). Does it fit and does it make any difference? Integrating CALL into the curriculum. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 12(5), 441-455.
  • Golonka, E., Bowles, A., Frank, V., Richardson, D., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 2(1), 70-105.
  • Greenfield, R. (2003). Collaborative e-mail exchange for teaching secondary ESL: A case study in Hong Kong. Language Learning & Technology, 7(1), 46-70.
  • Gregor, S., & Cuskelly, E. (1994). Computer mediated communication in distance education. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 10 (3), 168-181.
  • Kelm, O. (1998). The use of electronic mail in foreign language classes. In J. Swaffar, S. Romano, P. Markley, & K. Arens (Eds.) Language Learning Online: Theory and Practice in the ESL and L2 Computer Classroom (pp. 141-153). Austin, TX: Labyrinth Publications.
  • Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. (2003). Students’ evaluation of CALL software programs. Educational Media International, 40(3-4), 293-304.
  • Levinsen, K. (2006). Collaborative on-Line teaching: The inevitable path to deep learning and knowledge sharing? The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 4(1), 41-48.
  • McIntyre, S., Mirriahi, N., & Watson, K. (2014). Why is online teaching important? Learning to Teach Online Course Material. Australia: University of New South Wales.
  • Parker, P., Maor, D., & Herrington, J. (2013). Authentic online learning: Aligning learner needs, pedagogy and technology. Issues in Educational Research, 23(2), 227-241.
  • Simsek-Sagin, C. (2008). Students’ attitudes towards integration of ICTS in a reading course: A case in Turkey. Computers & Education, 51(1), 200-211.
  • Stephenson, J. (2001). Teaching & Learning Online: Pedagogies for New Technologies. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge Publications.
  • Stickler, U., & Hauck, M. (2006). What does it take to teach online? Towards a pedagogy for online language teaching and learning. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 463-475.
  • Tuncok, B. (2010). A Case Study: Students’ Attitudes towards Computer Assisted Learning, Computer Assisted Language Learning and Foreign Language Learning. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Ankara: Middle East Technical University.
  • Walther, J. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52-90.
  • Walther, J. (1995). Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organizational Science, 6(2), 186-203.
  • Walther, J. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43.
  • Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31, 57-71.
  • White, C. (2003). Language Learning in Distance Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Yang, S. (2009). Using blogs to enhance critical reflection and community of practice. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 11-21.
  • Yu-Fen, Y. (2011). Engaging students in an online situated language learning environment. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 24(2), 181-198.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.