PL EN


Journal
2014 | 22 | 2(86) | 73-96
Article title

Rozwiązanie problemu Butlera i wyjaśnienie efektu Knobe’a

Title variants
EN
A Solution to Butler’s Problem and an Explanation of the Knobe Effect
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
Butler’s and Knobe’s cases appear to show that our attributions of intentional actions are sensitive to moral considerations. The puzzles can be solved if (a) we reject the assumption that the puzzling attributions of intentionality are attributions of intentional actions, (b) we further reject the assumption that the concepts of intentional action and of intentional omission have a common genus, (c) we adopt certain (not unprecedented) assumptions about each concept, in particular about the relation to the notions of intention and of ability. The presented solution makes use of a reconstruction of the notion of what is within the agent’s power to do. I argue that the characteristic asymmetry in attributions of intentionality in Butler’s and Knobe’s cases is derivative from the asymmetry in intentional omissions. Since the intentional omissions in question are omissions to fulfill negative duties, they are easily mistaken for intentional actions.
Journal
Year
Volume
22
Issue
Pages
73-96
Physical description
Contributors
  • Zakład Epistemologii, Instytut Filozofii, Uniwersytet Warszawski, ul. Krakowskie Przedmieście 3, 00-927 Warszawa
References
  • Adams F., Steadman A. (2004a), Intentional Action in Ordinary Language. Core Concept or Pragmatic Understanding?, „Analysis” 64(2), 173-181.
  • Adams, F., Steadman A. (2004b), Intentional Action and Moral Considerations: Still Pragmatic, „Analysis” 64(3), 268-276.
  • Anscombe G. (1957), Intention, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Belnap N., Perloff M., Xu M. (2001), Facing the Future. Agents and Choices in Our Indeterminist World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bochyńska A. (2012), Efekt Knobe’a jako artefakt językowy? Studium z filozofii eksperymentalnej na gruncie języka polskiego, praca magisterska, Uniwersytet Warszawski.
  • Bratman M. (1984), Two Faces of Intention, „The Philosophical Review” 93(3), 375-405.
  • Bratman M. (1987), Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason, Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
  • Butler R. J. (1978), Report on Analysis “Problem” No. 16, „Analysis” 38(3), 113-114.
  • Davidson D. (1980), Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dębska A. (2013), Wnioskowanie na temat intencjonalności działania w ujęciu filozofii eksperymentalnej, „Filozofia Nauki” XXI.3(83), 143-155.
  • Feinberg J. (1984), Harm to Others. The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ginet C. (1990), On Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Goldman A. I. (1970), A Theory of Human Action, Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
  • Gorr M. (1979), Omissions [w:] Tulane Studies in Philosophy. Studies in Action Theory, t. 28, R. C. Whittemore (red.), New Orleans: Tulane University Press, 93-102.
  • Harman G. (1976), Practical Reasoning, „The Review of Metaphysics” 29(3), 431-463.
  • Hindriks F. (2008), Intentional Action and the Praise-Blame Asymmetry, „The Philosophical Quarterly” 58(233), 630-641.
  • Holton R. (2010), Norms and the Knobe Effect, „Analysis” 70(3), 417-424.
  • Kenny A. (1973), The History of Intention in Ethics [w:] The Anatomy of the Soul, A. Kenny (red.), New York (NY): Barnes and Noble, 129-146.
  • Knobe J. (2003), Intentional Action and Side Effects in Ordinary Language, „Analysis” 63(3), 190-194.
  • Knobe J. (2004), Intention, Intentional Action and Moral Considerations, „Analysis” 64(2), 181-187.
  • Knobe J. (2010), Person as Scientist, Person as Moralist, „Behavioral and Brain Sciences” 33(4), 315-329.
  • Knobe J., Burra A. (2006), The Folk Concept of Intention and Intentional Action. A Cross-Cultural Study, „Journal of Culture and Cognition” 6(1-2), 113-132.
  • Komorowska-Mach J. (2013), Negatywny program filozofii eksperymentalnej a odwołania do intuicji w argumentacji filozoficznej, „Filozofia Nauki” XXI.3(83), 156-165.
  • Kraemer E. R. (1978), Intentional Action, Chance and Control, „Analysis” 38(3), 116-117.
  • Levy Y. (2013), Intentional Action First, „Australasian Journal of Philosophy” 91(4), 705-718.
  • Lowe E. (1978), Neither Intentional nor Unintentional, „Analysis” 38(3), 117-118.
  • Lowe E. (1980), Peacocke and Kraemer on Butler’s Problem, „Analysis” 40(3), 113-118.
  • McCann H. (1986), Rationality and the Range of Intention, „Midwest Studies in Philosophy” 10(1), 191-211.
  • McCann H. J. (1991), Settled Objectives and Rational Constraints, „American Philosophical Quarterly” 28(1), 25-36.
  • Mele A., Sverdlik S. (1996), Intention, Intentional Action, and Moral Responsibility, „Philosophical Studies” 82(3), 265-287.
  • Mele A. R., Moser P. K. (1994), Intentional Action, „Nous” 28(1), 39-68.
  • Nadelhoffer T. (2004), The Butler Problem Revisited, „Analysis” 64(3), 277-284.
  • Paprzycka K. (1997), Social Anatomy of Action. Towards a Responsibility-Based Account of Action, PhD dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
  • Paprzycka K. (1999), Normative Expectations, Intentions, and Beliefs, „The Southern Journal of Philosophy” 37(4), 629-652.
  • Paprzycka K. (2003), Jak zaniechania mogą pomóc w zrozumieniu, czym są działania?, „Kognitywistyka i Media w Edukacji” 7, 274-284.
  • Paprzycka K. (2014a), The Omissions Account of the Knobe Effect and the Asymmetry Challenge, maszynopis.
  • Paprzycka K. (2014b), Intention, Knowledge, and Disregard for Norms: The Omissions Account and Holton’s Account of the Asymmetrical Intentionality Attributions, maszynopis.
  • Patryas W. (1993), Zaniechanie. Próba analizy metodologicznej, Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
  • Smith P. G. (1990), Contemplating Failure. The Importance of Unconscious Omissions, „Philosophical Studies” 59(2), 159-176.
  • von Wright G. (1963), Norm and Action, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Williams B. (1995), Acts and Omissions, Doing and Not Doing [w:] Making Sense of Humanity and Other Philosophical Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 56-64.
  • Wilson G. (1989), The Intentionality of Human Action, Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.
  • Wysocki T. (2011), Filozofia eksperymentalna jako metodologia filozoficzna, Wrocław: publikacja internetowa, http://www.xphi-europe.org.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-1d1c0b27-ff94-48c8-ab28-bdbf071a85a4
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.